Leaderboard

You boys wanted the lore, well HERE YA GO 😉

-1, Just because you have a LAAT doesn’t mean you should get a pilot job. I mean like... Some of y’all are pilot trained so why not just go off that. Plus almost every battalion agreed to remove their pilot jobs for a reason.

-1 First you guys ask for an LAAT to be added just because it has your markings/colors or whatnot. Now you want a job specifically to fly it. On top of the whole argument that previously happened over piltos, it's clear you're not over it as you stated you were and still seeking to remedy it. CG goes into the LAAT and secures the person inside, you don't need an actual CG pilot (or to make it where only CG can fly). I haven't even seen a CG Pilot in lore because they would just get clone pilots instead because they're trained for flying. On the opposing side, if the entire purpose of the CG Pilot is to fly the CG LAAT, this means he would be useless during events or deployment because other Pilots can fly the regular LAATs since he's restricted, or specifically brought in, for the CG LAAT. Of course that's an extreme view but why would it not be a thing since you'll make it where only CG Pilot can fly the CG LAAT, may as well make it just that.

If the job is 5 slot I +1 it. That's pretty much it, makes them a one-man army. Can unload an entire minigun then shoot a rocket to get behind cover to heal themselves. They won't need to depend on anyone for anything.

id like to just point out a little episode from season 1 where stone a CG along with some senators fly on a ship. its REGULAR PILOTS flying it no special marking nothin. -1 just use a snow suit or something

This is basically background on the situation and my feelings towards shakes about this. So I am little salty about this. There was one incident with one of my pilots and yall trying to transport a trooper. So I go to you like a man and we talk about this like men. We agree that a pilot in the front has nothing to do with the CG securing a prisoner in the back. We also agree that as a solution to prevent further conflict when CG has someone to transport they would check to see if any pilot jobs are on (if so call them to the laat to fly and the pilot follows the orders of the CG commander in the back) If no pilot jobs are on then it defers to a trained CG pilot. We also agreed that after that discussion the issue would be dropped. Yet here you are bringing this up again in your second server suggestion. Its nice to know you cant stand by your word. Lastly what I really don't appreciate (on top of you going back on your word) is during my conversation with you and the conversation chop had with you is threatening us with going to the Directors or Zim to get this rule changed because you quote "Don't like it". SO HERE ARE MY RESPONSES: This was literally the purpose of the discussion I had with Shakes but that was thrown out the window, also your correct there isnt a single pilot seen. Were assuming that the pilots that are in the laats are cg because everyone else is. As i've previously stated an indecent happened and we resolved it, apparently that wasn't enough. As well as Zyner is correct here CG's job is to secure the prisoner not fly them. There isn't a correlation between that and flying. Almost every battalion did at one point, and everyone chose at some point or another not to have them or to remove them for other things. Yes they should be able to fly anytime there is something to fly, ITS THEIR ONLY JOB. While it may only be 10 seconds or what ever that's their 10 seconds that's being taken from them. The server has strict rules about flying vehicles so their opportunity's are limited. Your correct you battalion is very lore heavy, so why make a suggestion that has no lore to back it up. While simultaneously ditching the agreement we made. This is literally an attempt to circumvent the current rules about pilot jobs. Because named pilots have the priority and y'all didn't like that or the AGREEMENT I made with shakes this suggestion was created. Lastly -1 for everything stated above.

CG can barely shoot straight, why expect them to fly straight? -1 Don’t even need a pilot job.

-1 Firstly you provide no lore or evidence that they're was indeed a CG Pilot, for all we know 99 could of been flying those LAAT's Secondly it isn't needed. Just get another battalion pilot to fly it and if they're not on, yes you can get a CG who is Pilot trained. Thirdly, you stated yourself when I talked to you, "CG are in charge of extracting prisoners" meaning that doesn't require CG to have any pilots but instead be in the same LAAT as the prisoner. The fact is this, I was told you had said to Spartan that you would drop the issue and let 104th continue to have their prioritisation over pilots, yet you continue to break your word. CG never had a pilot job in lore so why should there be one.

Here I'll make this an easy -1 you already got your new models and we aren't going to pay for another one just because you want a pilot. When you say "possible for gideon to make one" you better be spending your own money.

No battalion has Priority to fly. The people who “should” be able to be picked to fly first are people who are on the actual pilot job.

OMG faded love you LOL NO HOMO

Someone get this man a medal XD XD

-1 you already get your own LAAT and you can set up a PLT program for CG theres not even a pilot in the video lol

Yeah, I'll push this to Gideon or Kyle, one of them is already aware of the broken hitboxes on a few other jobs as well. Moving to acknowledged reports. //Locked

Let's just take the necroposters, and push them somewhere else. -1 Wait we get a plus one on our rep for supporting you? Oh ok +1

lol all of these arguments are stupid af, I think every battalion should have pilots honestly. but +1