Let me start this by asking the question, why should the jedi high command matter in terms of equivalence to the normal high command. I've seen from the only negative reply so far that the argument against the jedi is that the role in question does not hold the difficulty of aquisition, (applying) and therefore isn't deserving of the high command authority. I'll address this from two points of lore standing and one point of basic server functionality.
Lore wise, clones could and never did outrank a master of the order, with the jedi being the defacto leaders on the ground. The only cases of them being equals to jedi were that of jedi commanders, (padawans.) This is unrealistic, but what was in place worked, and the change was unneeded.
On top of this, there shouldn't be any high command as is set up in this server. Commanders were commanders, essentially Marshal commanders led battalions, not all clones. If the change should stay, the high command should be removed to reflect the change. Jedi authority > Clone authority. Lore wise that is.
Server wise, the equalization of the ranks reflected the idea of cooperation. Jedi held a rank of power to ensure jedi behaved with clones as high command did vice versa. With the change, lines will be crossed somewhere down the line, all because someone pulls rank. It happens to the best of people, and the change made to the hierarchy only enables these incidents.
+1