EOD Battalion

[Neins]

Name: Neins

Suggestion: Add EOD as a replacement for 91st or 327th

Implatation: add battalion and all the bells and wistles

Lore:( giving links cause im on my phone) http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Clone_ordnance_specialist/Legends

http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Clone_ordnance_specialist

Work Shop Content:

https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=905405211 

[Jayarr]

38th were removed for lack of numbers and lack of use, I can see the same here. EOD is hardly used in itself, so that's why it's battalion restricted.

-1

[Jax]

-1 we've learned for the most part battalions shouldn't be created for one specific role.

[Firat/Abi]

-1 We already got Senate Commando's and are probs gonna get an ARF battalion 

[Chambers]

-1

Doesn't GM already handle EOD training? it's a passive RP job so it doesn't need its own battalion.......

[Scribbles]

Ab-so-lout-ly NOT -1

[Fours]

+1-ing to fuck with the minus rep.

[J.Jefferson]

-1 GM is basically the EOD battalion.

[Cabrera]

-1 This would be deader than 38th

[Thexan]

-1

[Banjans]

-1 Reasons stated above.

[Core]

-1

[Guest]

-1

Tester: It was heavily stated in the meeting about removing 91st and 327th that just because those got remove doesn't mean there is now more room for other battalions. We had too many battalions when we had 327th and 91st.

Personal: I don't think we should add anymore battalions, especially battalions that specialize in 1 certain thing.

Edited March 11, 2018 by Dargon

[Rolenth]

Personal Opinion: "We will not be adding in a new battalion until the current ones are stable."

Tester Opinion:

Pros: I don't really see a point of this, we already have bEOD and a lot of people have gone through it so....yes.

Cons: It'd be better as a squad but even then, i'd still say no.

[Buzz]

-1 Yes, it adds RP but here comes the kicker. Didn't we just remove battalions so there aren't that many on ship? (Yes I know I was one of them) When adding a new battalion you have to look at how many people would actually be interested, which means more than 4 a day. Because if people see that there is only 1 person that gets on more than the others people will assume the battalion is dead (Only way to call a battalion dead if all of the members are dead or removed...kek) or the battalion has no interest in others.

[Mr.Acorn]

-1 I don't want to type out the reasons why I opose this because they're long but Ima give this a big -1 - Acorn/Rex

 

[Andrews]

-1 As previously stated, in the meeting where 91st & 327th were removed there are no battalions replacing them. We have enough of them on the ship already. Plus, the Galatic Marines are basically the EOD Battalion as they are the ones that train other individuals for Basic EOD & Advance EOD. 

[Duck]

-1, There is no need for this as GM essentially run EOD, with RC and Null being able to do EOD as well. Meaning that a batt for it is just not needed.

[Deadly]

-1 there is no need for a battalion for EOD. Also, 91st and 327th weren't removed just to make another battalion, so you don't need to try and create more, the server is good where it is when it comes to battalions imo.

[Esitt]

-1, would be a good idea later, but now it's not needed.

[Zim]

ɪ ᴛʜɪɴᴋ ᴛʜᴇ ғᴇᴇᴅʙᴀᴄᴋ sᴘᴇᴀᴋs ғᴏʀ ɪᴛsᴇʟғ.

ᴅᴇɴɪᴇᴅ.