Comics
-
Posts
1,441 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
61
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Comics
-
-
-1, you have a lot of ideas which is cool I guess but they all seem extremely half baked and just sort of not very good at all. A lot of the ideas presented are actually already apart of Navy such as "tasks" which navy can do by themselves it's just not a system HC ever made us of and "event leads" which is another system later Navy HC made very little use of but very much already existed.
On 11/20/2022 at 3:19 PM, Drone said:[Naval-HC]
The Ranks Under This Tag Would Be A Small Term Based System, If CO Are Wanting To Go For Of The Listed Ranks In This Section They Would Need To Make A Application Which Is Open To All Of Naval To Comment And Vote On (This Being The Only Vote On It No Shady Shit). If The Vote Is Passed They Would Hold The Position For 1 Month Or Until Someone Wanted To Run Against Them In Which Case They Would Need To Re-Run For It Against The New Applicant.
People Within This Section Would Be Required To Have No Arrests/Kicks/Bans On RecordThis section is the most blatantly just very bad. You need to re run for any admiral rank every month or until someone challenges you which could be literally an hour after you got it. Why would anyone ever willingly run through this awful voting system when they can basically have all the exact same privileges but as a lower rank. Refusing to pick your own HC and letting your battalion decide through monthly terms people must willingly run for limits your HC significantly. The only reason people would run for it right now is because there are no members of navy to vote against them.
ALso the hang over of no kicks/arrests/bans at all means you are basically going to be the only person who could ever hold these positions. Arrests, kicks, bans: none of them matter as long as the person isn't banned right now and hasn't done something absolutely henious in the last few weeks. Who gives a ashit if the best person in navy sat on a railing, why would you have such an unobtainable standard for a completely unrelated position, I guess it sounds impressive but you just will never have anyone ever hold it.
On 11/20/2022 at 9:24 PM, Drone said:So In Regards To The First Point Here, I Am Also Fairly Confused As To Why Its A RCMD.
it's an RCMD for the same reason Yoda is, factions are lead by RCMDs because their needs are very specific and so need their own HC representation. this should be something you know since you're running for the position, understanding it's roles is a bit important?
On 11/20/2022 at 3:19 PM, Drone said:I Think I Would Be Suitable For The Position Of Admiral Due To The Fact I Have A Reasonable Amount Of Experience With Documentation And Making Small Projects/Docs To Incentivise And Help With Out Of Event RP. An Example Of This Would Be “The Book Of Flesh” Given Some Of The Jedi Order Which Contains Snippets Of Lore They Sometimes Do Research Base Of, Also Making Use Of Its Knowledge In Events. Other Document Based Skills I Have Primarily Reside With Google Sheets, Including Some Examples Here Being The Dupe Indexes Many Versions (One Of Which Being A Website).
I Also Am One Of The More Active Naval At This Time (However This Is Not Saying Much As The Max I Have Seen Is 3 With 1 AFK), This Would Be Something I Would Also Be Aiming To Change.
your top, and only, reason for being a good admiral is document making. This is a cool skill but far from essential, you need actual leadership skills and ability to play out ideas, being able to listen to people but know when you need to stick to your guns. A lot of your replies lack confidence and you concede tonnes of stuff about your document which makes it seem like you slapped all the ideas you knew into a doc and hoped people would see it as you being full of good ideas.
Navy needs an admiral yularen and your document just screams intel director.
-
4
-
-
19 minutes ago, Cronis said:
In the case of the 104th, I believe leadership is necessary for more growth. Granted we have capable leaders both in the officer core and enlisted. But there is a need for something more and I believe I can stir this group into the right direction. My experience as a counselor (IRL) and my prior positions can speak for the possibilities for the future of this battalion.
your reason for you deserving BCMD being about 5% the size of your exprience where you basically say nothing just shows how much you don't care
You also copied most of this application from your last few apps, you have changed I think about a paragraph from those ones.
-1, maybe put in some effort? like pretend to care and not that you just want one of the many open BCMD positions
-
1
-
-
-
Just now, Conrad said:
I know the number of people this effects is low, but are the remaining few people just removed from the batt?
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, Conrad said:
Time to get the treadmill out i guess.
Also wtf does hard lock mean vs soft lock. You say it, but don't define it. @MarvelOnly you can save the Doom's Unit, we need you conrad, you're our only hope! (except maybe only bro)
-
1
-
-
The long play worked. Waiting till he was director then remove DU
Just now, Jayarr said:i think the delete button on the keyboard was made for this reason
Ermm I think this just won the internet!
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, KillJoy said:
So you rather get rid of a battalion that is actually rebuilding for the better for a battalion that looks cooler. I know I’m not on as much in the middle of the week but between different time zones and work i barley get to do anything. If you want more people to actually get back on the server. Think about what got you on the server in the first place. Everyone talks about the good old days but back then we had less stuff, but we had more creative for rp. People would interact with Bh or Sith. You don’t need GMs or staff to do everything. The server was player driven.
We've had this talk. DU is rhe most out if place, loreless, pointless battalion.
There is nothing special about them except their heavy rules and shield. There's nothing to use rhen for, that's why they're the only ones with fanon vecauee their lore is that terrible.
The reason this post is terrible is because it asks for 91st or 327th back lol 2 equally useless battalions who have been removed I think 3 times each.
We need to remove battalions and then leave it like that. DU takes up room and its room we don't have at all, it needs to be rid now and without a replacement
-
3
-
-
19 hours ago, Finn said:
Do you understand that if you go inactive that you will be removed from your position?: Yes
I don't really understand what you do as a sector commander because your notes on everything are pretty lacklustre. You seem to have a observer mindset so what do you do that's better than having the position just be unoccupied?
-
1
-
2
-
-
Stealing jokes from the poor once again
-
1
-
-
+1, you're not the Step-GM... you're the GM who stepped up!
-
2 hours ago, Venom/TJ said:
I want the Order to be striving with activity, roleplay, and other aspects. I want new Jedi to feel welcomed when they arrive making sure they aren't afraid to ask questions to help themselves and others. Other than that I think the Order is in a good state overall. I want battalions giving their input on their battalion Jedi more often as it helps get their Jedi noticed even more in the Order. Looking at the previous apps of Yoda I want to bring lore classes to create more RP and give knowledge to the jedi, Weekly Jedi meetings for the Order as whole to bring up issues, concerns, commendations, anything they want to bring up.
"I want to do good!"
-1, I know they're begging for applicants but this is smth else. You could've left the app blank and we would've known just as much about you or your plans
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, Maddoxx said:
nor is it a way that leadership sees as acceptable.
but you still did it anyway? What's the point of thinking it's unacceptable in the first place?
-
1
-
-
9 hours ago, Marvel said:
Yeah so all this really is is like giving the Senate a representative in High Command which before this was Palpatine
Ahhh so instead of 1 unrepresentative leader we have a different one who doesn't even oversee us at all!!! I guess directors making bad choices is a curse of the position
If you're banking it all off future plans maybe tell us rhem? Because this happens every time a unpopular thing goes through we get a classic case of 1 step in a process. But we never learn that process and suddenly the process stops without anyone knowing and we're stuck with the dogshit transitional stage
-
1
-
1
-
-
There was nothing selfish you did. Most failings were out of your hands tbh
You would've been great on a 2019 sized server
-
1
-
-
@Marvelour long time plan worked
-
gears, not everyone has the spare unemployed levels of time like you? maybe be appreciative of what we have!
love you xxx
-
1
-
2
-
-
You're a funny guy and one with integrity. You did what you could and didn't break from your stance.
This resignation is a truth bomb!
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Square said:
The thought that I personally don't care deeply offends me as I have spent a great deal of my life dedicated to the overall success of the community
Then why is tour first response to criticms always to make bad jokes as if there's no issue at all. You dismiss everything to start then post rambles about how you're actually great and nothing is ever wrong.
Even in this post you managed to blame us for the server failing.
10 minutes ago, Square said:YOU GUYS as players came together and made a day out of the server to do an imperial event, it was some of the best RP/time for all of you. Why is that only limited to that 1 day?
Like we aren't here to run your server. We aren't here to make it perfect, that's literally your only job. You cry about how we don't understand anything and your the only person who knows what's really going on. So why isnt it your fault that everything is failing?
If you're really running the show why is everything falling apart? Who are you leading, what are you doing. You lie deceive and manipulate because its easier to pretend everyone else is wrong. We know nothing because we are told nothing. Then nothing happens and we call it out and we're told off for being ignorant. Your server is dying and it doesn't matter what mechanism is causing it and whether we can see it. We see 4 men who have all the power to change and do better but we're told we can't understand and should stay quiet.
You can't host community meetings if there isn't a community. Who are you going to lie to then?
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Square said:
Ok
Another classic "who even are you" moment from one of our 4 founders responding to genuine criticism.
This is why you let jad do all the talking because he's at least good at pretending to care about the community. It's like a big funny joke to you because you don't lose anything since you aren't even a member. Do you respect anything about thi community, time and time again they complain about you doing nothing and you remain completely silent or crack some pathetic joke. Do you even read anything that people say? Your directors aren't happy, you have borderline unpaid devs doing all your work, and who knows how happy management is. You know you lose that $200 if no one actually plays on your server?
There isn't team here, no one wants to be on your side because you're killing the one thing they actually care about. Lip service isn't going to keep synergy afloat. You can't live in a delusional forever and pretend things will work out this way. You can't be both incharge of the server but not responsible for its failings when rivals are hitting peak easily
-
8
-
-
+1, we needed to separate GM from staff when TR stopped being an option
-
13 minutes ago, Zensras said:
Okay let's be real for one second:
Say new founders come in, then what is your plan? I'm seeing a lot of seething and less answers here.
If nothing changes, Are you gonna sit there and complain about Forseen and the rest?
Will say this at least: Jad is one of the more active founders of them all. He gives a shit.What has jad done exactly? Being a good pr guy doesn't make you a good founder? If current leaders do nothing and we have perfect replacements that already do everything what exactly are they there for?
No one is able to give every solution but maybe we should by making sure our leaders actually do something for the server? What should we do? Watch as the server rots and just don't blame the actual leaders because they're cool?
Maybe we want to play synergy in a year because sitting around feeling bad isn't exactly gonna make that happen
-
There's only so much you can sweep under the rug in 3am meetings. Apologies and excuses don't work if you never follow then up with change. So if real life gets in the way of ever runningservers maybe you shouldn't run them? You definitely shouldn't scrape the earnings from your volunteers who do all your job for you
-
5
-
-
My vote goes to Quality and Assurance
-
1
-
1
-
-
19 hours ago, Mystic said:
This sounds like something @Comicswould say
yeah maybe if it wasn't blatantly untrue LMAO. Please don't implicate me in something I haven't said for a few months.
No the battalion has absolutely no reverted, it was looking shaky when a lot of old members came back and started making interesting suggestions but Lyonaxis seems to have completely repelled this wave. GM has absolutely not fallen back despite what previously looked like it might, and this seemingly can be mostly attributed to lyonaxis just not slipping back upon old members. He's stayed firm whether being present or not that GM will not revert to old habits.
please do not implicate me in others uninformed statements
+1, see no reason for you not to get it
-
1
-
1
-
-
Who's Online 3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 131 Guests (See full list)
.thumb.png.d839fde7b373f3f4e08cb4b9d209f42c.png)
Return Special Operations
in Denied
Posted
You need 1 officer and 1 commander job, both cannot be commander job (this is how all subunits in the server are set out I believe)
I won't vote but I will say this is just never going to pass:
- you are not getting more models
- you just got DD models (they're not wasting their own money like that)
- Founders want SO as a separate batt not a sub unit
- some founders don't want regular clones having cloaks at all