Jump to content

Chambers

Legend
  • Posts

    2,104
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    24

Everything posted by Chambers

  1. @Tahunova613 Do you have anything to say about Andrews reply?
  2. @Sinister @Dragon believe this might one of you guys if you could chime in.
  3. Battle stations get rotated every 2 weeks @Gadget not getting a special battle station my guy sorry
  4. Why is this a server suggestion lol just ask Rancor to trade
  5. Well, this is an oof if I ever saw one. 1st. guidelines weren't followed regarding punishments for this sort of thing that's an oof 2nd. We have said time and time again to speak to people before banning and gauge if they are actually trying to be malicious. Richard, as a general rule, is a good idea to not have binds that affect other people unless it's for RP purposes. You have already served 4 hours and your ban will be changed for an additional 2 hours. so you will serve a total of 6 hours for your ban This ban appeal has been accepted @BigBurner Don't be afraid to voice your opinion just because of forum rep that dumb // Moved to Accepted Appeals //
  6. Okay, so I will explain exactly what happened. I was checking the discords to see if anyone had @ me so I could answer questions. I see a ping from 327th Discord I read the conversation and I reply but then I scroll down and I see this. "Actually I do have something to talk about Tucker made his name Zim in Teamspeak Poked me saying “Bly isn’t doing his job, and I need to talk to both of you” " -Tristan "I didn't agree Cyclops wasn't doing his job, I was actually about go on a roasting session with Zim, but it wasn't him I almost messaged tucker, disguised as Zim. What me and cyclops have been talking about over the past couple days future plans shit like that" - Tristan I saw the video of it and it showed it plain as day what happened This is the perfect example of why exactly you CANNOT IMPERSONATE OTHER PEOPLE doesn't matter it was the owner ANY impersonation is unacceptable. It just made it worse that he did it as Zim. I am well aware of Tristan's relationship with you @RvBTUCKER6669 as you can recall I intervened in a situation between you and Tristan and ruled in your favor on it, and I told you to not speak with him and if you had problems to go talk to BCMD>REG>Marshal. This was obviously a malicious act that was supposed to piss off Tristan and using Zim's name could have resulted in a confrontation between Zim and Tristan where Zim wouldn't have even known what had happened. This concludes what there is actual evidence for. There was a separate situation without proof (Unless Galle wants to come forward)of this message being sent. "Someone impersonated you as well ask Galle He got a message from someone with your exact TS name saying he was gonna get removed " -Tristan to Cyclops Regardless of the fact that some people think it is a meme it was an intentional act to cause issues and Tucker needs to take responsibility and punishment for his actions.
  7. I reviewed the evidence and you are under impression that "Semi-Serious" means "Let's blast Alabama N*** out my mic because that's still semi-serious" There are areas to goof off on the ship but you choose not to utilize them. Racism is absolutely not tolerated on the server at all. For the final nail in the coffin, you commented on your application to flame as well. This appeal has been DENIED you will be serving out the full ten days. //Moved to Denied Appeals//
  8. So it seems you have some genuine remorse for your actions, however. You should not have come bothered me about your appeal TWICE asking me about the status of it when it was only up for 2-3 days when others have been waiting far more patiently and longer about their appeals. This appeal has been ACCEPTED, BUT you will remain banned for an additional 2 weeks. You will be unbanned 11/5/2018 //Moved to Accepted Appeals//
  9. So we have cut down a lot of the crap in the reports/appeals sections. Please take a look at the new rules. If people leave dumb ass reasons for +1/-1s we just ignore them but they still have the right to express that. We are not making a section for each HA as they can't even do the ban appeals that is the Directors/Founders discretion. Reports with basically zero evidence other than witnesses (that can't keep stories straight) and "anonymous" testimonies are usually just thrown out. Concrete evidence is needed for anything to actually be done. Take a look at the new rules for each section. /Accepted (We changed the rules but most of this we won't be implementing)//
  10. Chambers

    LOOC

    I actually like this idea because there are times where I just want to give someone a little nudge or someone needs to ask me an OOC question without broadcasting it to the whole server.
  11. Chambers

    LOOC

    @MercyXD Wrong format my guy
  12. @Arroyo Still open for feedback
  13. Okay, the user will be unbanned as it has been resolved by an admin sit. /moved to accepted appeals/
  14. @Snadvich Did you actually resolve this?
  15. Let me just say that there are some parts we could implement and parts I would not implement in a million years, I will talk to Square as Directors handle all ban appeals/reports (unless the report is on a Director+) //Pending//
  16. @Scribbles were you the one that banned him?
  17. You didn't talk to any of the SOBDE members when all suggestions for battalions must be approved by a CMD+ (Or XO/Squad Lead for SOBDE) didn't even talk to the Reg. Plus they have brand new custom models and these look like shit compared to them DENIED @Esitt cucked
  18. The report has been voided by the poster. Moved to completed reports
  19. This report is locked until such a time I can speak to Sock as I have already spoken to Acroc and Patrick.
  20. I think SOBDE as a whole is underpowered considering how tough they were in lore (tv show/games)
  21. If you are caught meta-gaming it falls under failrp and can result in punishment by staff.
  22. Uh, there's literally nothing we can do about this since it's part of the map and not an addition we made, that would be up to the map author (Who made it like this in the first place)
  23. This map crashed anyone that went near the Jedi temple, I didn't experience a crash until an hour into building but eventually the majority of people had crashed once and Jedis consistently. (From what I can tell it started happening at 60+ players) @Tyzen Can tell you more about that end. It's a good map but if it has the risk of crashing people consistently we ain't touching it with a 10 foot pole
  24. The whole HC structure will be shuffling more as we are also removing senior commander and ranks will be changing more. We do not have to have our decisions approved by Jedi council it is a courtesy that we offer when we can This suggestion is DENIED
  25. So after speaking to Black I am going to unban @TurtleSpitz Black was warned and told again how to properly talk to someone before banning as the ban time was excessive too @Keo (old Pheonix) is building an OOC area that you can do these sort of things Appeal accepted
×
×
  • Create New...