Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/02/2021 in Posts

  1. So 1, what is the point of this do you want this in the cc room or what? 2. if you dont want it in the cc room this is something that most people already do? Its standard practice with DU idk about DS. 3. Any suggestions regarding shields has to consult DU as we have the final say on anything shields on the server. I was not approached at all about this. 4. If this is something you want in the cc room its kind of dumb and not needed it just happens normally. -1
    3 points
  2. This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED
    2 points
  3. Hi. I just wanted to say that when I was setting up the ATC Program about a year ago as both Chief Flight Officer & ACE Lead myself and the Admiral of the Navy at the time were more than willing to allow Jedi to be trained for LAATs and the only reason that the ARC-170 & V-19 remained "Clone-Exclusive" was due to a general disinterest on behalf of Jedi Leadership to share the ETA-2 in return (I had some ideas for an Elite-Clone-Pilots program that would utilize the Eta-2 since it was the best vehicle by far at the time). It was generally agreed upon at the time that there were Clone Ships and Jedi Ships with the exception of the LAAT, but that was more of a Jedi-driven mindset as opposed to a Naval or High Command mindset. I don't believe you'd have many issues getting Jedi the right to fly the ARC-170 or V-19 or whatever if they wish, so long as Naval is included in the process so trainings can be updated and moderated accordingly. I'd argue that from a gameplay perspective the reason that Jedi are discouraged from flying compared to Clone Pilots is that a single Jedi on the ground acting as a support unit using Force Heal & deflecting blaster bolts can make a big difference in a fight and that's really what most Jedi should be focusing on, but that's just me.
    1 point
  4. I agree with this just Tp there if needed.
    1 point
  5. Not that this couldn't be cool, but just from what I'm thinking about logistically. We havn't fixed the floating tree issue, or the floor glitching through in places. Or anything with the map. Would something like this even get done? Are the founder team even interested in spending the resources on our current map to improve it? Because if we havn't gotten even very small immersion breaking bugs fixed my hope isn't high for completely new additions to the map. Which just sucks that I have to say it like that honestly. I can kind of understand if its coming from a place of "we don't want to spend resources on this map before S&box map better", but if thats the case I'd really wish the community could be informed and not left in the dark about such an important thing.
    1 point
  6. Name: Guac | RC-3222 RP Rank: CPT Suggestion: Add a party system to the server which allows multiple options which could be customized to their server's liking such as a x-ray outline, disabling friendly fire, seeing squad health, etc - this would allow for better organization for groups of troopers, Jedi, Bounty hunters, and would be a good feature especially for new players. Full integration with C menu Up to 12 members in your squad Voice chat for your SQUAD Private chat for your SQUAD Ability to send weapons and money to your team Ability to watch their screen An awesome minimap to see where they are NPC or key binding or widgets, you decide how to open it Implementation: the following links are examples how implementation could be handled. https://www.gmodstore.com/market/view/squads-reborn https://www.gmodstore.com/market/view/4188 https://www.gmodstore.com/market/view/2109 Lore: N/A Workshop content if applicable: N/A (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Other: This is practically a direct copy and paste that @Nade Jonesused last year. While said to be pending founders, it was denied without any reason. I truly love these addon's and really feel as though this could be an AMAZING add to the server.
    1 point
  7. Ok, I have an issue with this line of thought. Currently if you think about it, Jedi have really only 1 vehicle they can use, the ETA. All other vehicles are used by, almost always, exclusively clones. There would be no reason for a Jedi to be driving a LAAT to a destination when there are able bodied pilots able to do the job. This meaning, that when flying, Jedi get 1 thing... the ETA. TL;DR: Considering every other republic vehicle is a clone "exclusive", I believe it isn't much to ask for another vehicle for Jedi. As far as Even Peill goes, I get it. I will not argue with people MUCH more knowledgeable than me about lag and server impact.
    0 points
  8. Name: Legacy/Warlord RP Rank: PO3 Suggestion: Sword and shield formation Implementation: we have a strategy in combat that usually goes down like so: Blaster wielders shoot at us, Jedi get in front, the DU and DS get the shields out: bingo bango bongo we go in and get out. What if that became a standard battle formation? We use it constantly but don't have a name for it, why not create a new formation called Sword and Shield? Basically it would consist of DU and DS holding their shields out in a shield wall, then the gaps that are unfilled can get filled in by jedi deflecting the bolts. All other troops can gather behind in a large line to return fire safely behind a wall of mobile cover. heres a demonstration using - as the shield | as the sword and V as the troopers |--|--|--| VVVVVV Lore: Who wouldnt sit behind jedi and shield users in combat Workshop content if applicable: N/A (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") EDIT: The points made in the comments are true and fair, the suggestion is now NULL.
    0 points
  9. -1 You're a Junior in college with the mind of a 4 year old. You just want to call people a HOE, so funny If you dumb me you have a small penis
    -1 points
  10. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
    -1 points
  11. Bruh, if you had of given us some time to finish going over everything, I would have added onto most of the posts :( Delta-7 This was denied as we already have a large amount of LFS vehicles on the server at the current time and we already have the ETA fighters that are strictly Jedi use only and adding another Jedi only vehicle set isn't something that we're exactly content with at the current time, this was discussed and unanimously agreed upon by all four Founders and Maxwells that this wasn't needed at this time. Even Peill Even Peill was denied due to the fact that his model is broken, in that I mean, when he died, his ragdoll doesn't behave normally and could cause issues on the server if it interacts negatively with parts of the map and could cause unwanted crashing of the server. On top of this, a decision was made by the founders, again unanimously, Jedi model changes require a Jedi model to be removed, and we have decided that a Jedi that is to be removed cannot be one that was on the council. This decision was made based off of past trends that when a member of the council is removed from the server, they are inevitably resuggested and require to be readded to the server and thus would cause backwards development. The suggestion requested for Adi Gallia to be removed and she was a member of the council.
    -2 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...