Leaderboard

Really sorry to be clapping on all your guys' suggestions tonight, but sometimes you just gotta do it to em. First, Draa was not an ARF trooper. He was just a regular trooper that used a rocket launcher. As seen here: straight off the Wiki. NOWHERE does it say anything about a sniper. gamer is just a neighbor with a rocket launcher -1

-1 I believe that this would take away from the "scout and recon" aspect of GC and what makes them special. There is already ARF for this reason in the EC. If anything, doing this would only split the number of people that would be ARF and end up creating another dead branch. Also specialization tryouts are bad so please take that out back and delete it before anyone gets hurt.

-1 A $50 system shouldn't be utilized for just two players. This should not have been made for just bad batch and instead for everyone. The only people who can dictate this are the Founders. I agree also with Zensras, he's right about how much WiltOS takes up performance wise on the server.

-1 A $50 system shouldn't be utilized for just two players. This should not have been made for just bad batch and instead for everyone. Basically this would be my reasoning so -1

Personally, I think the better option would be to remove GC ARF all together. Before freaking about about some retard coming in and dunking on the suggestion, here are my reasons: 1. encourages people to want to stay in EC because that is where the ARF class is. 2. SS is dead because arf is just the superior class in every way. (better weapons) 3. GC is supposed to be the recon subunit of the battalion and regiment since it is under mechanized and keeping ARF exclusive to EC makes a bit more sense to me because as I stated in reason 1, it gives EC something special especially as the vehicle class of the battalion. 4. Bring back the previous specialization of 41st GC Support trooper because scouts are superior to ARFs. Scouts are essentially phase 2 ARFs. -1 for at least an amendment of this suggestion