-
Posts
172 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Satan
-
-
From start to finish:
A Ticket was called asking for a staff member. Once there I was asked to look for which TG was killing the Binks family. It was found to be Guardsman V which I was let known is deathtiger. From this point i get all the kills from him. There are 4 binks and 1 501st member that were killed during that event. Looking at the logs it was seen that the members deathtiger killed were non combatant during this point as they do not have any kills associated with their name. I did not take this at face value. instead I went Kaiser and asked about his event. I specifically asked what each of them were doing at the time in which he pulled two of his event jobs that were still in the TS. After talking to each one they were both non combatant at the time of death and were told not to be hostile during that time.
One stated that while in the temple he hear "slit their throats" which can not be confirmed if it was deathtiger who said this. All that logs show is that he was killed by deathtiger.
From also investigating it was found that one of the binks was killed while in detainment.
At this point hearing the stories and seeing the kill logs I came to the conclusion that it was MRDM
There was no sit done as deathtiger was not on the server nor TS when looked through.-
2
-
-
+1 Lots of good interactions and always willing to learn more. Would love to have you apart of the team.
-
1
-
-
HUGE!!!!!!!! -1. Biggest powerplay of the century here. 3 days in the battalion and applied for Rex.
I just don't think that you personally after 3 days as a Officer understand the dynamic of 501st.-
3
-
1
-
-
9 minutes ago, Keegan said:
The document was put out publicly April 9th, meaning anything up to that point was the actual finishing touches for the document to be put out officially. Hanz completed it and sent it out, he is the blue one in the pic.
Trying to call the BH-permits some system that is an accomplishment to do on an application is disingenuous when all it entailed was getting a server leadership to re-link the channels. It takes all of 5 minutes to actually complete. When I talk of the old system, I refer to how it was done simply by just messaging or pinging a Guild LT to tell them to approve a contract with a document. Making a new channel for it really isn't some major accomplishment or something really "new".
While those were issues with former people as well, I see similar coming from Rohan as I already and have some examples which are not proper to be placing here and I can provide to High Command if questioned.
I'm sorry we disagree, but for a High Command position overseeing our faction, and with a bad record of it representing us well, it's fair if we have concerns that someone doesn't communicate with us before trying to get it and making a bunch of uninformed statements that miss a lot of context for how we currently operate.
Do you really think people will be caught often enough for this to be used, and even then caught a second time to reference their prior offenses? What if they're using an alias? This is simply not going to function well and is just going to make people want to run away even more than presently if they get caught by someone, rather than try to do any RP with it. Any punishment that would result of this would just be putting them in a jail cell for X time, which is boring as fuck, or making them pay some fine which just encourages people to hit people with the book every single time. It's another system that people will forget how to use.
Due to the content of my receipts for this (including locations, IP, and so on) I will send it to any Server Leadership who request it, but I am not sending it publicly as doing so is not appropriate or respectful to the privacy of the person affected. I would love to be able to send it to Server Leadership upon request because this behavior has bothered me for some time and has stuck to me as a defining factor for how I view Rohan, as someone who cannot be trusted with power. If they don't see any evidence from me, I would of course edit my post or just take a ban for lying about such a thing.
I want someone in the position who is capable of not lying directly to the person who would be becoming their seconds-in-command in order to get a leg up.
1. There is equal work between Hanz and Rohan from an overall perspective in changes done for the rules till April 9th. Hanz was the one to send it out as he was the Guild LT at the time and Rohan was a marshal. Does not make sense for a marshal to push out a document of this nature.
2. The old system also entailed the upkeep of the post but was just done in the commander discord. This was a way of moving away from them having to go to a separate document to look at valid contracts. The upkeep was managed by the Guild HC. (I should know I did the upkeep when I was GL)
3. This does not address the concern I have raised. Claims should be backed up to a certain extent whether that be some kind of proof that you tried to reach out and he didn't respond all the way to leaving mid convo without going into full details.
5. Speaking from internally rancor in the last month alone. Over 6-7 people were stopped from the Data heist as this was tracked during Brooklyn's last term. This was only one of the many ways that someone can cause a violation as mentioned and from a single battalion.
I also did not mention any types of punishment nor fines that would be paid. We have already seen this with RSB and it did not go well. To add to my point is that I can see, in conjunction with @KnightVRwho has done amazing work in CG, this can be made an applicable and realistic system to put in place. As of now everyone is aware that BH do not have much repercussions for their actions besides death. This could be a way for senate to hold more jury trials. (Haven't seen one in a while. They use to be fun.)
6. Again this doesn't address the concern of it being baseless, as all personal information can be withheld from said receipts. What I am asking for is definitive proof of a claim, that you made publicly, that defames the character Rohan has on the server.-
1
-
-
Im just going to speak on some points to clear somethings up.
2 hours ago, Keegan said:In particular to the new Guild Rules document, this is something that many people have wanted to do for a long time, and while you kickstarted working on it, it is something that we know Hanz (the Guild LT at the time) did the majority of the work and actually completed the document itself. After you stopped in the initial stages, Hanz completed the project itself.
From looking at the edit history of the rule document; not in regards to any recent changes that might have occurred; the documents is primarily a copy and paste of the old one with addition of other documents to combine them. There was an even amount of work done between Hanz and Rohan in regards to reordering/reformating/removing any rules. there was one addition by you and one by zeros. Edit History from creation to post: https://prnt.sc/8nu7FAWUbWmg To April 9th
Blue: Hanz 4 Edits. Primarily copy and paste over from other docs.
Green: Rohan 4 Edits. Primarily copy and paste over from other docs. Some small changes to order and reorganization
Purple: Keegan
Yellow: Zeros2 hours ago, Keegan said:Regarding the contracting system you say you made as a temporary solution, this is something that isn't worth being mentioned as an accomplishment. All that happened was someone else linked the Discords to the BH Permits, and a channel was created in the BH Discord to log when a contract was put in. These are good things, however not anything of any major value or major change. As a group who has contracted more people than anyone since we got our positions, we can say completely that the system before worked just fine and adding a channel didn't change anything.
It may have worked fine for the senate but from my perspective everyone was questioned whether a base permit was valid or not. This gave people a reassuring way and maintained log of who has an active contract. This is primarily just a reimplementation of the log that was in the previous commander discord which was archived due to being added to the main discord. TL;DR The system was always a thing it just got moved to the BH discord.
2 hours ago, Keegan said:Regarding approachability and conflict resolution, we honestly do not believe in your abilities with this or trust to manage it. On several occasions we have felt disrespected and felt we have not had the chance to fully say or allow a proper amount of time for people to consider what we have had to say. While on these occasions this is not necessarily something in which our opinion is necessarily required, as someone potentially going into the Governor position, we feel as if Mas Amedda and the Guild Leader should be able to give feedback and feel welcomed when discussing things with the other faction, rather than their input being thrown aside. We have felt disrespected and treated like nothing before by others in this position as well. Given how you couldn't wait a day to post this to give us a chance to talk to you and explain our goals and what we want to see in the Senate to you, we see this problem only continuing and not getting any better.
Kirara? This kind of sounds like the problems guild HC and senate HC collectively had with her. If you can explain more in-depth about how specifically you have not felt heard or a conflict was resolved with Rohan explicitly that would be much appreciated.
On to the last sentence, I would like to speak on this with past apps. There is no requirement to talk to anyone in positions directly under the applicable position. While I do agree that there should be some talk between them I whole heartedly don't agree that this should be a primary reason for a -1.2 hours ago, Keegan said:Regarding relations, the concept of a "public violation log" is absurd. Not only is this implying there will be some sort of law system for a violation to be under, which was suggested in the past few months by a member of HC and shut down by Mas Amedda and a Governor due to how it would only limit RP, but we have serious doubts as to if it would be used by the server after around a week's time has passed. This is similar to what RSB had in the past which failed as well and just limited BHs and annoyed them to the point of getting off the job. Furthermore, this completely goes against what you know we (Keegan in particular) do not want to see from the Citizen faction's interactions with clones, complicated systems. The entire server has to come to understand these systems that BH uses, and if they are something of this nature, such as some Google Form and Sheet system, it will not be used, go out of date, or fall into irrelevance and see total apathy from almost every member of the server, similar to how the base pass has worked, and still does work to an extent (even with an in-game system). No matter how "self-evident" these systems are, you still rely on the player-base to be able to understand them and memorize the information. This puts further burden on your average player who wants to join CG or any clone battalion to know of this system and know to a basic extent how it operates.
From my understanding with the post, it seems that he will just be using pre-exisiting offences, ie. tresspassing, data heist, etc and they will be logged to keep a record. Not sure if any new things will come but there are already a lot of way to get a violation so to speak.
This system seems like a way to keep BH in check with consequences in regards to doing hostile actions towards the republic. Frankly speaking this does seem like it could be an effective way if it was more ironed out and he could talk about it more.
2 hours ago, Keegan said:Between the Senate and the Citizen faction, saying that the Senate will collaborate on bounties is something that is already a potential, however, simply no Senators can work on a hostile bounty outside of Gume Saam and Mas Amedda, and for the friendly bounties, most of those are quite frankly boring to discuss and the interaction is done better through the implementation of bills like our recent one which gave a system for setting up public clinics with the citizens. Most of those bounties just make boring, repetitive RP.
IDK about this one chief. I'm confused just seems like he wants to allow you to discuss your bills publicly. Maybe this could also be a way for senate to infect some sort of diplomatic status in the village to make you more apart of the faction. Doing this could allow for senate to have a greater presence in the primary facility where the faction is located. This isn't a diss that senate isn't apart of the faction but more of a comment on how they seem to operate almost separately from each other. I agree with the sentiment of bringing them closer just might not be the right idea in order to do it.
2 hours ago, Keegan said:We also see you as a sly and dishonest person, given your past with leaking IP addresses on another server abusing the powers given to you, and how you post this today, not even a few hours after telling your clear other opponent you would give him a chance to be able to post his own application, since he is unable to post it right now due to a frankly silly ban reason. This application feels rushed due not only to its content, but it being posted not even a few hours after your one attempt to reach out to Keegan, and zero attempts to reach out to the rest of us, and even posted less than 24 hours after the position opened suddenly without any planning behind it. It's actually fucked up that you'd apply after telling someone you'd give them a chance to post their own app in an attempt to get the position before they can even post any kind of response.
For the first part I think it would be greatly appreciated to back this up with some evidence at least, otherwise this just seems like a baseless defamatory statement towards him.
For the second part about him posting without having a way for @Hanz to post. This is something that is out of Rohan's control. The position is open for anyone that is able to apply, he should not have to wait for someone else to get out of a punishment that was given to them from above.
This is not a vote. This post is to clarify some points made in the original post by Keegan as well as to ask for evidence to support said claims.-
2
-
9
-
3
-
-
3/4/3
armory laggy with so many droids close by and to many in a tight space for anythign to be done without dying 15 times -
+1 Love this man
-
1
-
-
Name: Satan
SteamID: STEAM_0:0:60059784
Who helped (If applicable):
Link to Event/Encounter Document (optional):
Description of event/encounter (required if no document provided): Bugs attacked the road to theash!
Did any Bounty Hunters Participate:
Please rate using this scale
Please Rate 1-5 on each of the below categories (5 being perfect, 1 being horrible)
Gameplay:
Care and Effort:
Server Performance:
-
31 minutes ago, Marvel said:
My honest opinion:
Remove Guild Spy and Guild Jumper. Add the option to buy 1 time use jetpacks and cloaking devices for a hefty amount of renown. Tired of seeing every single Citizen only utilize these two jobs. Especially since the in-game limit of 3 at a time was removed.
My NUCLEAR take:
Remove every job and only have Citizen / Bounty Hunter jobs. Make everything available on the black market as 1 time use items. Bacta kits, syringes, fusion cutter, armor pack, jetpacks, cloaking device, misc weapons, etc. However imo the black market shouldn’t be unlimited items where everyone can buy as much as they want. There should be weekly shops where there are X amount of this item and that item available and once they’ve been bought out you gotta wait till the next weekly shop update to be able to restock.
This will make Citizen’s value their lives way more imo.
+1 tho to the overall idea
+1 The suggestion only if this is how it goes. I do suggest some way for guild HC to regulate the prices/supply for these items.
-
5/5/5 Loved the gonk named GONK. He will be missed.
-
-
-
-
-
-
1/3/1
-
RP Name: Satan
Steam ID: 76561198080385296
VIP (Y/N): Y
Age: 22
Timezone: EST
What was your previous staff rank?: VA
Are you currently staff on a different server?: No
Why did you leave the staff team?: I started working again doing 60 hours a week.
Why do you want to rejoin the staff team? (3 sentence minimum):
I understand that being part of the staff team for a server like Synergy is a big responsibility, but I am eager to take on that responsibility once again. During my previous time as a staff member, I enjoyed being able to help the server and its community in various ways, such as addressing concerns, resolving conflicts, and creating a positive environment for everyone to enjoy. I also appreciated the opportunity to work with a team of dedicated and passionate individuals who shared my love for the game and the community.
I want to rejoin the staff team because I believe that I can contribute even more to the server and help it grow and thrive. I have gained more experience and knowledge since my last stint as a staff member, which I believe can be valuable in addressing new challenges and improving the overall experience for players. Additionally, I am eager to learn from my colleagues and contribute to a team environment where everyone's ideas and insights are valued. Overall, I believe that rejoining the staff team would be a great opportunity to continue supporting the Synergy community while also growing and developing my own skills and abilities as a moderator.
How do you feel your previous time as a staff member went? (3 sentence minimum):
Reflecting on my previous time as a staff member, I feel proud of the work that I accomplished and the relationships that I built within the community. As a VA, I took my role seriously and made sure to follow the rules and guidelines set by the server. I was committed to providing a safe and enjoyable environment for all players, and I believe that my dedication helped to make a positive impact on the community.
I also feel grateful for the connections that I made with other members of the community. I made an effort to be friendly and approachable, and I believe that this helped me to build trust with the players. It was important to me to be well-liked within the community, not just as a staff member, but also as a fellow player. Overall, I feel that my previous time as a staff member was a positive experience, and I hope to continue building on the relationships that I established during that time.
Do you understand by re-applying to get your previous rank back that you will be tested on your knowledge of the server rules and practices?: Yes
-
1
-
-
Name: Satan
Steam ID: On Roster
Staff Rank: VA
Are you VIP?: Yes
Date: 7/9/2022
Reason for leaving: I don't feel motivated to be staff anymore. So much happening IRL as well as dealing with the guild that I don't have the time to do the requirements that are set out. So instead of being removed like a loser imma just peace out girl scout.
Farewells:
@HanzCongrats on VA!!!!
@MarvelLove you broski
@MazenAs much as I hate to say I hope you move to GMD.
@MaddoxxIm coming for you. (Congrats on management)
@MavellePut in that work!!!
@BirdYou got cucked outta a promotion for an unspoken rule when all the VA's agreed to promote you. Better luck next time my guy.
-
2
-
2
-
-
Congratulations! You have been ACCEPTED into the CWRP staff team!
// LOCKED
// MOVED TO STAFF APPLICATIONS - ACCEPTED -
Your LOA has been APPROVED and LOGGED.
Please notify us if your LOA is to end early, by tagging me here with an @.
If you have not requested an extension to your LOA before the original date then you will be assumed to be off LOA after the LOA period is complete.
-
Name: Satan
Staff Rank: VA
SteamID: On RosterLength of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): 6/21 - 6/30
Reason: Been feeling sick for the last couple of days.
Do you understand that if you go LOA/ROA on a named Jedi Character for more than two weeks, go on LOA/ROA on any RC character, or go LOA/ROA while being clone commander, you will be removed from that position: Yes
Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your leadership position?: Yes
-
Your LOA has been logged as COMPLETED.
If this is an error and you require more time, please contact a Head Admin or a Director immediately.
// LOCKED
// MOVED TO LOA - COMPLETED LOA'S -
Your LOA has been logged as COMPLETED.
If this is an error and you require more time, please contact a Head Admin or a Director immediately.
// LOCKED
// MOVED TO LOA - COMPLETED LOA'S -
Congratulations! You have been ACCEPTED into the CWRP staff team!
// LOCKED
// MOVED TO STAFF APPLICATIONS - ACCEPTED
-
Who's Online 12 Members, 0 Anonymous, 121 Guests (See full list)
Satan's LOA 6/11-6/25[COMPLETE]
in Completed LOA's
Posted
Name: SATAN
Staff Rank: SA
Length of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): 6/11-6/25
Reason: Stress with exams and life atm
Do you understand that if you go on LOA/ROA while holding a leadership position, a named character position, or a position with limited slots you may lose your position? Yes
Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your staff/leadership position?: Yes