Forseen

They are separate and Rancor isn't responsible for ARF troopers, only ARC status and Troops.

Can you guys please give a reason as to why you've both said these? @Dennis @Felix May I ask for what reason? @Qal ARF wasn't mentioned in this post.

This makes a lot of sense and hence I have updated my post.

Battalion ARC troopers receive the boost from their host battalion. ie. 501st ARC has 501st DC-15A but not the 100 Health boost from Rancor.

The reason I say remove it from Rancor ARC too is that it doesn't make sense for all of them to have it, the Heavy currently is just another model with the same loadout and it's not exactly fair to remove them from Battalion ARC but keep it for all Rancor when all Rancor would still still have the Westar..

Name: Forseen RP Rank: Rancor 1stLT (Suggestion approved by @ Sixta who is BCMD Blitz of Rancor.) Suggestion: Changing and balancing ARC troopers throughout the server. Implementation: Removing the "Clone Minigun" and "Republic Launcher" from all battalion ARC whitelists and all Rancor whitelists except Heavy Ordinance and Alpha ARC. (Leaving in Alpha ARC to give something special for the sub-unit.) Lore: https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Advanced_Recon_Commando https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Advanced_Recon_Commando/Legends In these pages (Cannon and Legends) that ARC Troopers used a lot of different weapons, however the minigun and Rocket Launchers were listed as "Special Equipment" and wouldn't need to be used at all times and as listed on the page, "When heavier firepower was required, ARCs donned specialized armor to bear the weight of reciprocating quad blasters, PLX-1 portable missile launchers, or Z-6 rotary blaster cannons." However it's not listed as common equipment. Workshop content if applicable: N/A If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: (Any job modification requires all this information) Job: 41st ARC / GC ARC / 91st ARC / 104th ARC / Dash 29 / 212th ARC / 327th ARC / 501st ARC / TC Fives / TC Echo / TC Jesse / 187th ARC / SO ARC / DU ARC / Rancor Heavy Ordnance (Replace Minigun with Z6) / Rancor Medic (Minigun) / Rancor ARC / ST ARC / Regimental Commander Jobs. Slots: Unchanged. Description: Unchanged. Model: Unchanged. Weapons: Remove "Clone Minigun" & "Republic Launcher". Other: N/A.

@ Korm good luck!! I tried this when I was Palpatine about 6 months ago and I was told it wouldn’t happen due to the model being broken and buggy and breaking with adminmode all the time. However I see no reason for this to not be added! As for the lightsaber, we should add a Palpatine Lightsaber and try to make it so it doesn’t show on the hip of the player model

Not only do I agree with this, it also makes it easier for a Game Master to identify someone who is pilot trained by the helmet. -1

This is true, however maybe instead of removing the skill points, revamp them? Make it so that each point costs more and each point gives you less? Making it so skill points give you extra armor but 2 per point rather than 10? Same as health possibly? Making it so that troops can't be a "One Man Army" as we all know this ruins some great events. Obviously it would need to be heavily discussed and perfected, but this seems like an amazing idea. +1

-1 There's no evidence therefore there is nothing to base the report off.

It's not specifically Icefuse, it's more about the fact that the staff member that banned you, in this case @Dolvek thought you were advertising and asking players to move from this server to another. The reason the ban was instant was as it would have been seen as malicious intent, however I feel this may have been a misunderstanding, I would like to hear Dolvek's side of the issue and his perception of what happened before I give a vote on this.

I love the effort for this Dennis 🤣 I feel as though the intentions of the Undead were good however it's not really an acceptable thing that has happened, whether it be an accident or not, people have been suspended before for less. Obviously I will edit this to vote properly once Undead has commented.

I posted this already in this thread, late react for you sir ❤️

I would post this in the Forum Bug Reports but... https://i.gyazo.com/b9998631c883110073b52f6770c4487e.mp4 <-- This happens However, I do love the rest of this forum update, the forums looks amazing!

I actually disagree with you there @Marvel. I know it wasn't used at all, but Defcon 4 the way we have it now is way to vague, I have for a few occasions used Defcon 4 as a "High Alert" status and people were getting annoyed because they spent a few minutes searching the base when it was just meant as High Alert as we had a VIP on base and wanted to make sure they were secured. I feel as though if we don't add Defcon 6, then maybe the wording or understanding of what Defcon 4 currently is should be updated to make more sense to the majority of the community. Neutral

+1

I actually like this idea better and we can integrate the Game Master system by having the Game Master Chief and Officers run a large planetary siege, we can have written out reports on how the battle went, proper plans and make it a large 2+ hour event with all battalions being involved in an epic scale deployment!

I feel as though the dumb react, if used properly, is a great addition to the forums in such that it allows people to state that the post that they are reacting to is... dumb. For example, if someone states that something is a fact, such as Obi-Wan Kenobi was Jedi General of 327th, you could rate this post dumb as it's obviously the person being dumb. People should just use the forums and all parts of it as intended, or should be reported/punished.

Honestly I feel as though this would be a great quality of life addition to the forums that can be used to simplify applications and suggestions that will de-clutter the comments section. If we move the voting to be on the post itself, it will free the comment sections for information, opinions, questions/answers and other general knowledge of the topic post. +1

@Nightmare I think you should probably change the wording on this to better reflect how you feel as it seems the only point in which you have brought up on your original report is the misuse of the "Dumb" reaction on the Forums, however by reading the comments it seems to be a bigger issue in which you have. I suggest either voiding this and creating another post properly outlining your issue with the player or edit this post and expand on it as right now there's not a whole lot to go on. I can't really vote on this personally, as I can see that the report was mainly written for the toxicity of mass dumbing, in which I know is technically abusing the rep system, however it seems as though the user you're reporting (@Hayley) has stated that this was an honest mistake and she will fix the issue in the future. However as stated, if there is more to the issue, I suggest changing the topic and main idea of your post to better explain and expand your points.

@Dreams- literally told you that EA has stated their single-player IS CANNON and their multiplayer is NOT CANNON.

I agree with @Dreams- & @Scribbles 91st is mobile recon, they don't really need a heavy... If they need reinforcement they should ask for reinforcement, the idea of different battalions is so that all battalions have a role to fill on the server not so that 1 battalion can do all things.

Looking at the comments on the addons for Hyperspace tool and Ship Destruction Tool, it seems as though people are having errors. Have you personally downloaded and tested these addons to test that they work as intended?

I never had this either, I guess we were just gods among men

What are you implying 🤔