Jump to content

Forseen

Retired Founder
  • Posts

    2,477
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    49

Everything posted by Forseen

  1. After reading over the replies to this thread I noticed a couple of things. Most of the original 327th members that caused it to be toxic are now permanently banned from the community or have changed for the better (ie. Mitchell), this means that there would be new blood leading the battalion if it got added, which may help it succeed. Some battalions now struggle for players, adding another battalion into the mix wouldn't help. Attack is fairly strong right now and it may be nice to spread people out a little more, but we should encourage them to join the battalions on the server rather than adding another. Due to the mass amount of negative feedback on the suggestion, if 327th did get added, it can be assumed that a) There would be nobody interested in joining or leading 327th & b) 327th wouldn't have a positive start with the image of the server not wanting it, same thing happened to 187th when they were added off the community poll of 100 players wanting to add it in (This has nowhere near as much support), everyone that wasn't in 187th resented it and the people inside of it. We are on Felucia and the time period is confirmed as two-weeks before Order 66, so it would make a lot of lore sense for 327th to be added, however, in terms of battalions and character jobs we don't fully follow lore 100%. 501st and 212th are already extremely similar battalions (excluding sub-units) and do pretty much the same job, adding 327th would be another battalion that would be in the attack regiment doing the same job as these two battalions and would cause less people to be deployed on events due to more battalions and there not being much sense for three front-line attack battalions to go on one single mission. I think if we were to re-add the battalion with a decently large basis of players wanting to be a part of the battalion, it could work. With a strong leader setting standards and setting the battalion up properly, it could be something amazing. But we don't really have that.. Knowing how the community has worked for the last roughly 3 years, if there was large community support and players wanting the battalion added, Joah will honor it and add the battalion, however I don't see that here. -1
  2. I would prefer this, or remove mobility all together!
  3. Don't make meme reports wasting the time of our High Staff team. // COMPLETED.
  4. @OneClick You should discuss with Rancor high command. @Mitchell - Battalion ARC's all have them, why should their sub-unit ARC miss out?
  5. So how would they go about making atleast one of these a set ARC job? It's a Sub-unit and they want 1 ARC in it? Sound familiar? Wolfpack. The Wolfpack ARC trooper isn't an ARC in lore, yet it is in server, I don't see why this is an issue at all, although 2 ARC jobs may be pushing it. +1
  6. Approved with the following guidelines. Cannot be given to another player. Channel may not be locked, ever. Channels are to be utilised to contact Regimental Commanders easier. If the channels are found to not be used, they will be removed. @Ron
  7. This ban time has already run out.
  8. Can you provide a source for the lore towards why this should be a thing?
  9. The mod would literally just respawn you? Takes 1 second instead of 2 and stops extra unneeded load on server
  10. /cc, /ct. -1
  11. Denied due to lack of community feedback.
  12. The same was true about both Mechanized battalions, as well as 91st before it’s removal. This is an issue of consistency and y’all aren’t keeping up either. Roleplay? On a Roleplay Server? How dare they... I have discussed plans for Naval recently that they’ve been working towards and I’ve been keeping a close eye on them. They are heading in a good direction. Also not going to remove Senators & Naval and have no Roleplay based jobs left on the server other than events as most of the player base relies on others to make RP for them. Seeing as though this wasn’t brought up to the Admiral or Marshal Commander, This is now DENIED.
  13. Forseen

    Ban Appeal

    Seems as though you forgot to mention this?
  14. Yes this is lore accurate. However, here are some counter arguments. Yes this is Lore accurate, but a lot of things on the server are not lore accurate. Echo brings nothing new or extra into Bad Batch that they don't already have from the 4 members they currently have. Echo is a large part of 501st operation and I don't think you have thought about this very much. Big -1 from me.
  15. Changing HP amounts for jobs such as RC, ARC, etc. will not scale well with the skill points system (F2) on the server. As it goes off of base HP and adds extra HP for each point. -1
  16. I have looked over this appeal and others that you have posted in the past. I remember your name from a long time ago and that there were a lot of issues revolving around you and your presence within the community. However, it has been a long time since you were banned and I want to give you the benefit of the doubt that you can evolve and grow as a human being. Your appeal will be accepted but only under the following condition. You will be on final warning for (60 Days) after 60 days you may appeal these warning points. If you create issues for high staff or break any rule within these 60 days you will be immediately permanently banned again. Appeal Accepted Signed - Forseen (Clone Wars Director)
  17. Excuse me what? Looking at the situation, the staff member in question dealt with people that had come onto the server that were causing nothing but issues and followed protocol and staff training to remove the people from the server to allow people to get back to enjoying the server. The staff member, utilized a tool in which he was entrusted to be able to help handle a situation, in this case using spectating to gather evidence. In this specific case, the staff member chose to allow Coruscant Guard to fulfil their purpose on the server by arresting them for a minor rulebreak. What you are saying by reporting this, is essentially "The rule isn't broken if nobody sees it happen" which is completely absurd. As an alternative, Zen could have handled the situation himself and arrested the offenders as a staff member but this would have interfered with the Coruscant Guard and make them being on the server almost pointless. @traditional and I have discussed the situation at length and both agree that there is absolutely nothing wrong with this situation. Thread Locked Moved to: Completed
  18. From my understanding, wee could go back to Anaxes, but we'd have to redo perma props
  19. Seeing as though he's a staff member dealing with a situation and the situation was seen by one of our Head Administrators, it is up to you to provide proof that this didn't happen.
  20. It's just what the workshop does now, unfortunately.
  21. @Duck and I have been pushing for this for the entire time Synergy has been a thing... It was approved through council when I was a master over a year ago... +1 BRING HIM BACK!! (There's already a model in the workshop..)
  22. Jesse has already been an arc slot position for quite a while as we already use an ARC Jesse job, this one is just lore friendly as the original made was prior to the new season launch and was a guess based off of what the armor may look like. Remember the January workshop update makes new items on workshop show the uncompressed size, meaning 13 meg is actually quite small.
  23. I like this suggestion. +1 Although, not sure about that model. I know I found it and linked it to you, but surely there's better out there lol
  24. Trad and I have discussed the possibility of this suggestion and have decided to deny it. We feel as though this could be too easily abused and wouldn't make realistic lore sense. However, we are open to the idea of other possible rewards for the top clan of each month, should you wish to bring them forwards. // Locked // Moved to Suggestions - - Denied
×
×
  • Create New...