Jump to content

OneNiner6719

Member
  • Posts

    458
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by OneNiner6719

  1. Neutral, if this was event job or something, I'd +1, it'd make it interesting.
  2. +1 more event things are always good.
  3. +1 I totally agree, and a lot of it comes down to a level of respect, if a jedi respects a clone officer under them, they may show that respect with a salute, and the same for a clone to a jedi commanding them (although it'd be more likely to be a more free-thinking trooper, like an ARC or something) These people giving a -1 are cray cray.
  4. this. I've used the gm westar before, and boy is it meaty
  5. +1 second chances!
  6. Neutral, I like the appeal, and I'd definitely prefer it to be able to go do my recon stuff and train my troops on how to do their job and not have some random whoever say "no you can't do your job, go away", but there are rules for a reason...
  7. -1 just use the gun you have, and be happy with it. (by the way, the scoped dc-15a has worse hipfire accuracy than the standard, you don't want it.)
  8. some of the things that aren't whitelisted are goofy, like there's a whole range of PHX plates that just aren't whitelisted, because reasons?
  9. +1 I remember leokyle... although "accidentally multiple times" doesn't sound all that 'accidental'... still, second chances and all.
  10. OneNiner6719

    VOID

    -1 go for a pistol or dual pistols or something instead, instead of an army of snipers
  11. +1 Always preferred SC to SO
  12. -1 clones were generally numbered via batches and numbers within batches and such. we just ignore the batch numbers as they tend to in most star wars content.
  13. +1 BOOOOXEEEES
  14. @Forseen Can you show us what the 91st neyo model looks like... for comparison?
  15. +1 hell yes. EDIT: Still a +1, but there's a "fire aura" mode that is no bueno to framerate. Big Flare is also probably what we'd want to use.
  16. +1 I was still staff when they implemented the AFK rule, and it's still happening. Lay some law down, dammit.
  17. +1 People neeeeed it.
  18. Woo, finally getting BARCs to 10
  19. Neutral, as Jefferson stated, it is one of the reasons why it's good, but I'd definitely said it really should be removed from the deathwatch flamethrower
  20. +1 sounds tasty
  21. +1 why not?
  22. -1 while they can be annoying, removal of flamethrowers as a whole would make me a sad, because they're really fun for infected events, especially when spawned in by a gamemaster, and also, people paid for that weapon, it's not something you can just "have"
  23. Neutral, only way I can REALLY see a rocket-ammo spawner work is if it had a cooldown. Some people make enough money, or have enough built up where the cost doesn't matter for jack shit.
  24. yeah I'd rather not have people uploading malicious encodes to the forums, thanks
  25. Lightning squad doesn't have one ¯ \_(ツ)_/¯
×
×
  • Create New...