-
Posts
230 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Striker
-
Strong -1 from me for the battalion ARC portion. (For RANCOR +1 I guess? I'm not in RANCOR and quite frankly I don't really care y'all can do as you wish) ARC training is a tough training to get. It takes time not to mention it is on a very strict schedule. This is not a training that you complete in a day (there have even been people I have even known to take upwards of a month completing their ARC). Then you take that fact along with battalion ARC already taking a pretty big hit from RANCOR slots wise (a reduction from 10 to 6 slots), and I'd say ARC is balanced as it is at it's current state. If this suggestion were to pass it would literally mean the actual death of battalion ARC. Period. What is the point of working to actually do ARC training at that point? You have to take a training which for some takes a while, fight with 6 others for a slot, and on TOP of that the job is worthless?? Like come on, its a tad bit ridiculous to be honest. The job would no longer be appealing in the slightest. While in RANCOR there are unlimited slots, you get to be an actual job specialization as an ARC (Medic, engineer, etc.), and you have an elite company based around ARC as a direct step up from standard ARC. I'd say if it takes any longer than a single day of training for any job, the payout better be good. And in this case, the payout would literally be, sorry to say, garbage.
-
I don't mind the addition at all, if they want flying medics give it to them. I strongly believe in setting good precedents. And a precedent has already been set for flying medics for standard battalions. Even though I personally don't like the whole "I have a jetpack and I can go from one end of the map to the other while healing people" (With the exception of Kom'rk, he is SF and should get SF gear) I have no right and no place at all to say that someone else shouldn't get it. Especially if my battalion has what they are requesting. That being said, the 212th will be putting in a suggestion to receive parachutes in place of the jetpack if and once they do arrive. And I hope that this will also be receiving the parachute alongside the other 187th paratrooper job. tldr, +1 if the 212th gets it then they should too.
-
What a clown, good luck becoming Commander Cody when you are perma blacklisted kid. -1 - Commander Cody
-
Uh what class is this exactly? Cause all of our classes are the exact same as in every other battalion. And the 2ndAC trooper has the exact same loadout as a standard trooper just with a small scope on top that literally does nothing.
-
Jetpacks arent necessarily always used to "get up to elevated surfaces to initiate far ranged combat". You might use them that way. But that doesnt mean everyone else has to. The 212th being an attack battalion has to push the enemy. Making it far more likely that we will be in close quarters combat. Jetpacks can be used to get closer to the enemy leagues quicker than a normal trooper. That paired with the fact that 2ndAC are airborne means that they will be paratrooping in some cases right on top of the enemy makes it useful for them to have a CQC weapon. The shotgun is a weapon ideal for that role. If someone could come up with a reason besides "I dont use my jetpack that way so you dont get to" that would be helpful. Or even better provide some sort of weapon to fit your standard of long range combat (and no not the sniper because the reason this is being made in the first place is because we dont have a sniper class anymore). +1
-
There is a God
-
So uh done on Monday as in they will be added on Monday or are we going to have to wait another month for our models?
-
Just to clarify, I gave permission because APPERANTLY we "may" replace the class with something. At least that is what I have been told 50 times by multiple different people even though it doesn't make sense to me that we would be allowed to replace it. so please don't bean me Zim +1
-
I'm going to start off by saying I apologize for not informing you further of what had happened with the docs. But we didn't end up having to remake the doc, I don't remember exactly how Perri got access but eventually he did. And Perri ended up making copies of all the docs before they could get deleted. As for the "holding the docs hostage" part yeah, he did end up doing it and from what it was looking like this was all on purpose. Kelso had already been extremely inactive before this and got removed. So naturally one would assume this was being done on purpose. Top that with the fact that he didn't explain himself well at all and that lead to his ban. This was all extremely worrying for all the 212th. Now, after looking at this my opinion is that he should be unbanned. However stressful this was and as much as I still to this day strongly dislike Kelso for his terrible attitude towards me specifically I think he should be unbanned. It might have been a misunderstanding or he might have done it on purpose. But there would really be no harm is bringing him back to the server. THAT BEING SAID, he will not be unblacklisted from the 212th. For reasons I just stated above and because he still "held the docs hostage". I don't think I can trust him being on the 212th anymore. +1
-
It wasn't just a simple mistake, multiple people on all kinds of levels of the server agree on that much. But that's besides the point. You were legit flaming him on the post and causing even more drama. Also, maybe you should apply this same logic on your own report? -1
-
You guys? We didn't have a choice in the matter. Neither did you from what you just said. It's like you taking a spoon of you macaroni and forcing it into our mouths saying "I worked really hard on this and you ARE going to fucking eat it."
-
+1, JB hit the nail on the head.
-
Yep, thats what a community is. Even those kinds of people get a voice too.
-
We have, SEVERAL TIMES. If there is anyone here who should stop its you. Stop playing the victim card and realise that this post is pointless. Its clearly not going anywhere. If this server really is as bad as you say, what the hell are you still doing here? And also, this is a community. That is why we can respond to these posts.
-
First of all, it was 5 people not 11. Just an FYI. We are allowed to post our opinions and it just so happens that all of our points agreed. Also, I didnt know that posting my opinion which also happens to disagree with yours is hostile. Hmm, now I see why CG had an issue with you, you are legitimately fucking toxic. I keep my -1 and if I could somehow make it an even bigger -1 that would be great.
-
MEME -----> ( Honestly, +1 massive power abuser. Absolutely horrible treatment of CTs, this guy needs to be removed ASAP! Please demote his ass back to fetus. But ignore the fact that he is enforcing his battalion's rules, that has nothing to do with it ok. Horrible person. HUGE +1. ) <----- MEME Obvious meme btw ^ Sanchez is a good noodle. From what it seems like to me he was just following the rules placed forth by his BCMD. And for that I commend him, great work Sanchez. The fact that this was a staff abuse report anyways is kind of a meme in and of itself. Since he wasn't abusing his staff powers at all. If he WAS abusing (Which im not saying he was) he was abusing his BATTALION powers. The ones given unto him by his battalion commander, not staff. Overall -1, just seems like an attempt to get back at him because he removed you cause of your own fuck up.
-
+1 I am still extremely confused as to what the hell is going on. But from the little I know and knowing spooky pretty well I can safely say that this is worth maybe a temp ban at the most.
-
Wowza guys, this idea is great! Let's just add in 187th back no biggie. Oh, no room? Lets just go ahead and remove the 212th. 212th is a useless battalion with no lore. +Uno HAHA, no. BIG PHAT -1
-
Hi there Egert. Let me put this plain and simple. 2ndAC haven't been a bit inactive. They have been dead. For several months of trying to revive the regiment noone seems to step up to the challenge. Even when you were Bear, you didnt do much at all to help revive it. You did something last minute right when you were about to get removed and half assed it. Snap back into reality and face the facts. Stop having this war in your mind with 2ndAC and GC. Cause it is honestly getting really fucking annoying.
-
Well 327th are going to have to answer the first part. But as for the rest, yes your information is correct. Now as for the support trooper, it would obviously require both of the trainings that would entail having a medkit and a repair tool. Basic engineer training and basic medical training. But advanced in both would be heavily encouraged. And obviously some sort of recon training either ARC or ARF (I'm not 100% sure as to how ARF training works but we shall see). Well as for your 2nd thing, its more so something that we gain from losing a whole sub company. A jetpack perhaps. That's kind of what we thought of. And as for regular ARC having it, no. Ghost company are harder to get into and regular 212th ARC having it would kind of defeat the purpose. And also we divided up the slots to 5 and 5 so ye.
-
Well, there you go K-Company. May you guys thrive in place of 2ndAC. Dont let us down. +1 (Bit of bias since I was part of the process LOL)
-
WELL BOIS, 212th HAS SPOKEN. WE WILL HAVE SOMETHING UP PRETTY SOON. K-Company will have their room in the server.
-
I love the idea of K-Company. It has some great lore and people have had great experiences with it in the past. What I will NOT stand for however is the removal of a 212th sub unit in order to add back in K-Company. We have the same amount of jobs as 501st due to our 2 sub units. If we get this removed we lose about 5 jobs. This really would not be fair at all especially considering the substantial lore behind BOTH of our sub units. But I will leave it at that. Huge +1 if it is added on it's own. Even bigger -1 if 212th gets stripped of 1/4 of its jobs and a sub unit because of it.
-
Lmfao. Why is this even up for debate? -1, go bother someone else. ALSO 2nd chance? More like the 50th
-
Who's Online 2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 79 Guests (See full list)