Danny

Lmao it would be lowkey hilarious if he was actually your friend and doubled down ngl.

If the dude is truly your friend why isn't he just defending you on this post lmao. Feels like it's super easy for him to say he was kidding.

I was told @WarMaster informed you to post this.

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. You may re-submit an appeal in 30 days. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED He isnt banned in the first place. This is basically voided

Alright closing this

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. You may re-submit an appeal in 30 days. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED Author voided this once he realized that he posted it too early and asked the director team to take the post down.

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 5 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED The author has chosen to void this for the time being due to the controversy on the post. The CMD team of the 501st will talk to the 104th CMD team and will reach a conclusion on whether or not they want to suggest this again or not.

Great work from the dev team all around. I hope everyone is giving you guys kind words of appreciation for your efforts.

Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. You may re-submit an appeal in 30 days. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED Reason for denial: I discussed with a couple HA's regarding this ban appeal. While we agreed that your mistake was not an intentional nor a malicious one, your ban appeal comes off with some deflecting undertones and we believed that you should just wait the short 2 weeks remaining in your ban.

Congratulations! Your ban appeal has been ACCEPTED. You may be contacted by a Director+ to discuss your return. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - ACCEPTED

This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Voided this for you @BROPDROP

Huge thanks to @Wosy and the @ Developer team. Super grateful to see how much Synergy's Dev. team has changed in the past year and a half. Looking forward for things to come.

Question Answered

Yup will be announced. Hope to see you there :).

Completed

I think HA Clorox explained this very well. - Going to mark this as resolved. Feel free to reach out to a HA+ if you feel like gamemaster rules should be changed. - As it is now the GM has the right to dictate the rules for his event such as "no perma weapons." - Furthermore the GM during an event server has the right to remove players from his deployment if he believes that is the right course of action. If the GM is obviously caught abusing this perm he will be penalized according.

Question Answered

I totally understand your concern on this matter, and I appreciate your desire to build to help your battalion. However, it is set up in this way to reward our players who have shown repeated dedication to the staff team and have earned those perms. If we were to give out SA perms to everyone who requests it for building purposes it would lessen the achievement our SA's have worked for. As always I encourage anyone who has the drive for building to apply for staff. If you have any further questions on the matter feel free to DM me and we can have a discussion on the matter.

5/5/5 Keep up the great work!

+1 Awesome Suggestion. I mean who doesn't like more cool option.

-1. I understand the viewpoints of the statements above, however in my opinion nerfing the guns would be unfair to the people that bought them. It's not like you can get a refund on the items, and other strong weapons like the fire shotgun have not been touched.

+1. Would be a good fit with the team in my opinion

+1 good ideas and would fit well with the team.

+1. Bana has shown he is capable in regards to Staff and I feel like this is a safe and reliable pick to add to the quest team.

If this passed and I killed CT PVT Ben, a current well known minge in CG, and I told you all it was self-defense you would believe me. Ben doesn't have clipping software(or at least he claims so after my 8th or 9th ban with him) so I would not get punished either and would most likely get away scott-free. This is why a rule like this allows a dangerous way to powergame and I believe should not pass. I have to -1 this for right now.