Leaderboard

@Carvis Said it perfectly. I'd also like to clarify, this is not the only issue we've had with this particular individual in the past. Jackson, Myself, the founders as a whole have had issues about Doc brought up multiple times. Doc was given an opportunity to speak like an adult then. Instead we were greeted with someone else to speak for him and an immediate attitude issue from Doc himself. (When you're given the opportunity to speak to the owners thats your time to speak up and talk like a human being) If you wish to remain silent and give a negative attitude, you're not going to go far. Again (I am not making a decision on this period) AKA. Doc I'm giving you a chance through other staff members decision. (Directors +) I have not even spoken to them in regards to this issue. They are able to make their own decision on this. The fate of his ban rests in their hands. My opinion of Doc is severely biased. I'd immediately vote no. I've had multiple issues (Personally) with doc in the past. A lot of behind the scenes shit and public. My opinion is extremely negative of Doc, and I feel my vote would be emotionally pressed and not logically. Good luck on your appeal.

Bro you dead ass lied k. Doc barely talked during the conversation like come bro. He was alittle mouse while his big strong man was talking for him. Don't say that square is lying when you're going to do it yourself. I'm sure everyone in that call would of listened to doc if he fucking said something and not hide behind you the entire time.

Was not going to reply but this "Alright easy there with the lying @Square." really tweaked my gizzard. if you really want to vindicate this opinion you should just post the "recording" that you told us you were making of the TS conversation 90% of conversation was conducted by you (Speaking on the behalf of Doc or not whatever the flip floping that kept happening) as Doc went either went AFK or refused to speak to the Founders when they tried to have a conversation about why the post (I think the entire Convo lasted over 30-40mins not a "brief "coversation) was made but the reason boiled down to this. Yes, Doc was frustrated with some of the processes or things on the server (All heard 2nd hand as he didn't play at the time or only hopped on a couple times) Was the post designed to highlight this? Hell no it was specfically designed to get a rise out of the Founders and was basically admitted to as such during the start of the connversation in TS. Now for the appeal itself because Doc is an opinionated retard that caused so much shit that I had to deal with but never actually broke any rules until he decided to go in the toxic cesspool that all members join at one point or another. Even though this appeal is a very onesided and interesting intepretation of the facts I will say this: +1 he can come back and if he slips back into old habits we can just bean him again and say "Well we tried forgiveness"

Having a big strong man doesn't make you not masculine, but it does mean that he didn't say anything. Also, no he was given ample chances to speak in very long awkward pauses. Carvis would know lol

This ban appeal has been on-going for a while now and there should be a verdict at this point. Look, we all make mistakes in our lives, we're not perfect in any shape or form but this guy really wants to come back. I got permad off the forums for being extremely toxic and was absolutely horrible towards certain individuals, but I came back a year later saying that I am sorry (Which I am). Maybe his ban was justified but maybe we all could try and look at this differently and see what's on the other side. I remember when I got unbanned from the forums I was told that if I was to get 1 more strike within a certain time frame then I would be permad again without the ability to appeal. So what's my solution to this? Basically, give the guy a chance to prove himself, If he breaks any rules then he can be straight up permad again without appealing. That to me seems very fair to the lad. Seems like people here have very strong opinions on this guy but as a person that has no clue of the guy, he seems like he messed up big time but has totally regretted what he did. Lets turn the other cheek and try and see what he has installed for us, to prove himself to us. We're synergy! We are the refuge of IFN, we allow second chances. I say we make the verdict today, to get this out of the way. No matter what the management decides, I will truly back them regardless of what decision they made. Please think about this ban appeal with a good heart. +1 You have my support but please prove to us that you have changed and that you will never make the same mistake again.

I agree with both Sanchez and Joah, during the conversation other people were speaking for Doc and every time Doc did actually speak it was just to make a shitty comment or just acted like he didn't care. my brain hurts from this... -1

Hmmmm, I am not aware of this situation as I was gone for some time, but that being said let's examine what we know. -Someone made a shit post on the forums degrading the community in the sense of comparing it to a less desirable one. -In turn, for this mistake the person was handed a permanent punishment. From my point of view a singular mistake shouldn't merit permanent action. It is obvious he wants to return and has said to have learned from his mistake. I push for an unban. If he is disingenuous about learning from his mistake and proceeds to continue his erroneous ways then by all means drop that ban hammer.

My two cents on this. Doc was incredibly ignorant during the entire situation, and allowed someone else to do the talking for him. When confronted, we got silence, and half assed attitude. I do remember exactly what Square is referring to. I'm not putting my hand in this decision, my answer is obvious. I'll allow a more mature audience to decide it. :)

To this day I still will never understand you people who talk immense shit out of your ass about the server and then proceed to continue playing or in this case ask to come back. I think you people need Jesus.

-1, I’m all for making named characters more specialized and more specialization in general, but you don’t need a stronger or “more accurate” weapon to be a good marksman. Shooting is only half the battle. You wanna be lore accurate and a better asset, call out troop movements and scout ahead, you’re a sniper with a jet pack, on of your biggest advantages is your reconnaissance abilities.

-1 “lOrE aCcUrAtE” head ass it’s called balance also isn’t the IQA-11 a perm weapon? like bruh it hurts my brain when people use the lore thing to argue against something. Like there is something called gameplay balance. But the 15x is plenty of fine. Next thing you know I’ll quote lore saying that Havoc squad is SOBDE and should get the DC-17 loadout

people that charge money for GMOD addons are cringe. #KeepitOpensource