Leaderboard

If you have at any point been following this and I know you have, then you know what it is lol I am not going to explain anything because it isn't even my place to explain it.

Hi, I think Ron summed this up perfectly honestly. But to add a little more sauce I will apply the following, a quote from another forum saying A-A-ron was a hero and doing the right thing. To respond directly to posts made here: @Mike If you think this was a ban based on his opinion of the server being in a bad place, I really, really worry for you. I have clearly stated the reasons he was banned, and his opinion on the server being in a bad spot was not one of them. Many users voice their concerns weekly, monthly, whatever about the server, and they have the right to do so, because it shows they care. They are attempting to provide solutions, but as @Ron has stated, that is not what A-A-ron does. He makes constant complaints without even playing and provides no solutions, he intentionally attempts to stir problems and bully or belittle others. If you've followed him, you can see this within his posts. Also, since we are throwing jabs and opinions out and about. imo you should of stayed banned after the first one, but Nightmare and Joah saved you. I see no change in your attitude based on that post. :^) @Regional We almost never provide such info, as it can be labelled as slandering. We only provide it in situations it is needed. In this situation, it's not needed. As to this appeal, this ban was never placed strictly on behalf of the single post, and I feel many users are forgetting that. I feel A-A-ron is trying to play a victim card, or he really cannot grasp that it's not based on a single post but his consistent toxic attitude. I personally think this community would be better off without him and that this appeal has been posted WAY to soon after original ban, which makes me think he has learned nothing. However, to defend him, I never said it was a no appeal, and I have no problems with a time limit being put on him moving forward. IE a month, week, whatever ban. I also /HOPE/ that since he is attempting to appeal, he does infact care, and simply has a shitty way of showing it. If he is unbanned, I would strongly hope this is a big wakeup call to him on how to handle situations. Because unlike a majority of this community, I do actually have a proper good job, and work fulltime, I do have responsibilites and years of experience with situations just like this. And I DO know that this attitude will not help you in the real world but likely land you in a shitty job that you cannot stand. Respect and kindness for all is some of the best things you can carry into the real world. (not jabbing people not working or in school, but many users are at the age of 16 or below, including A-A-ron and I can promise you don't have shit figured out by that point.) tl;dr read it, cause alot of you base opinions on the easy to read 5 word posts eks dee. I am leaving this up to the Directors choice for appeal, but request he is left ban atleast a week starting from original ban date, if the ban is changed.

I've never read something so true in my life

+1 I'm so confused and scared how a mans got banned for that thread, aaron do be saying stuff I disagree with most of the time but come on the ban, the cheeky wee message and the poll edit was kinda gay, that's more toxic than what he done. But what evs Merry Christmas!!!!!! Edit: DrAmA

Let's not skim this by my friends. I've just been lurking, I don't give much care to what the fuck goes on here. But this is a good point. Albeit aaron was a little...out there, in terms of expressing himself, this should serve as a solid kick in the face to knock it off, as has been shown by a lot of previous perma bans that were appealed. I want you to kept that last bit in mind.

-1 lmao he made good points against me on his post at the start and i made good points against him we left it at that and it was respectful. However his reaction to things and responses later in the post were childish and wrong. There is a way to do things and handle things and that wasn't it. Hearing about his previous history that wasn't that long ago about being a toxic individual brings me to my vote. My advice is to give it time before an appeal goes up and grow and learn from mistakes. We all make mistakes we are all humans. Btw that includes Zim, Joah, Jackson. I know it's fucking crazy to think about but they are humans too and make mistakes.

>Staff abuses and indirectly helps a guy get banned >-1's anyway Loljk anways i havent posted my official vote on this. +1

[ - Name(s) | Rank(s) - ] 104th PLTO Major "Keldeo" | Jedi General Plo Koon | Jedi Mythos Master Kellyn Deo [ - Suggestion - ] Beginning the Transition to LFS Vehicles [ - Implementation - ] Oh boy, here's a touchy topic. Before you see this and instantly -1 because "It's Been Denied" before, hear me out. When it was first suggested back in its early days, it was very rough and there wasn't much content available to suit our needs. Back then we had maybe the ARC-170, Vulture Droid, and I think the BTL-B Y-Wing which was very buggy. What we have nowadays is amazing, and it's come a very long way. Firstly, I'm going to cover the basics of what we need on the Server for aerial vehicles. Fighter. Bomber. Transport. Simple enough. There are currently several available vehicles to suit these roles. Fighters: ARC-170 Starfighter, V-Wing Starfighter, V-19 Torrent Starfighter, Z-95 Clone Headhunter Starfighter, ETA-2 Interceptor, Delta-7 Starfighter, Vulture Droid, Tri Fighter Bombers: BTL-B Y-Wing, Hyena Droid Bomber Transports: LAAT/i Gunship, HMP Droid Gunship, Nu-Class Shuttle And even beyond that there are even more amazing vehicles available that can easily boost the realism and impact of battles. Turrets: Anti-Infantry Turret, Anti-Vehicle Turret, Anti-Aircraft Turret Carriers: LAAT/c Light Frigates: Consular-class Cruiser, Republic Assault Frigate And most recently, LFS has pushed out a 'Ground'breaking update that has introduced, yes the bad pun says it all, its first Ground Based Vehicle. The AT-TE. Now before it gets stated, yes. There are a number of vehicles that do not exist on the base. Things like the latest Republic Patrol Transport (LAAT/ie), AT-RTs, BARC Speeders, all still only exist on the Star Wars Vehicle Base we currently use. Simple solution, however. We do as we did for the Star Wars Vehicles we currently have, and pick and choose. Decide what things we should keep from SWV, and what things to add and replace with LFS. LFS brings a lot of positives with it that the current base we use does not offer or is severely lacking. Better Targeting and Combat System: Dear god, I can't tell you how many times I've launched a BTL-B Torpedo and it locked onto a friendly vehicle and obliterated it. SWV's targeting system is about as good as the targeting for Force Abilities on the Lightsaber. And with SWV, you barely get the chance to abandon ship. Quite annoying when you have a full transport. LFS gives you time to bail out once you've been put down. AI Controlled Aircraft: I'm sure GMs would go absolutely CRAZY if they didn't have to call EJs or they themselves to fly attacking starfighters. The AI is surprisingly, well, intelligent. Works very well with the Anaxes Map and the Venator Maps I've tested it with. At times they can be a real threat, and most enemy AI will attack ground targets. Some with explosives. Options for Co-Pilots and Gunners: Oh man, multiple Pilots in a single aircraft? Yup. Before, it was only our BTL-B Y-Wing Bomber that had the Co-Pilot Ability. Now we can have up to 3 Pilots for an ARC-170. 4 for the LAAT/i Gunship (Yes, the Side Turrets Actually Work!). Promoting Cooperation between Pilots as well as Coordination between Starships and Air Traffic Controllers. And if you don't have another Pilot to man your tail gun, no worries! You can take limited control from your position! Shields: ...'Nuff said. Really though, many ships have shields that block incoming small arms fire for a good while, and even regenerate to a degree out of combat. Look. I've laid it all out, and I've taken up enough of your time. So, the closing arguments. Star Wars Vehicles was an amazing base for its time. It helped revive Star Wars on the Workshop, bringing many things into a modern age. And it still holds up today. But with the creator no longer updating it and many SWV Developers moving their vehicles to LFS... I'd say it's time we get with the times. The transition might be awkward, getting used to a more WAC/SWV Hybrid style is certainly not easy. But in the long run, it provides a more enjoyable experience for Pilots. Pilots in our current state really get little enjoyment out of the dogfights they're in. It's a game of ring around the rosey until one side gets in just the right position to lock onto their target and just chip away at them. This rewards pilots for taking risks and knowing how to use their aircraft, getting the right position to intercept and take down an enemy fighter. But in the end, I speak for a very small minority it seems. The choice is yours. Just please, if you do not want this change, or even if you do... explain why. If you don't like LFS, give us the reasons. If you absolutely love it, tells us why! It's what can make suggestions like this easier in the long run. [ - Lore - ] https://starwars.fandom.com/wiki/Republic_Navy/Legends [ - Workshop Content - ] [LFS] - Planes (Base) | https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1571918906 [LFS] Vulture Droid (CIS), Animated Startup | https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1573617472 [LFS] LAAT/i + LAAT/c & ATTE | https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1878568737

+1 yikes this is why people have an issue with dRaMa bAnS. you cant just ban people because at the moment they think the server is in a bad place. Making a discussion about things with wrong with the server and calling it is the server dying may not be the best approach but it isint fucking toxic and doesent deserve any ban definitely not a fucking perma like actually this is a joke aaron imo made that post with the intent of helping it atleast in his own way of how he thought right and you banned him and for what? he said some things that upset you? in your own words "grow up" TLDR and I dont care if I get clapped a third time for this: This ban and ban reason are both hypocritical af

Just to clear a few things up - Zim did not edit the poll. He banned the user and posted his response to the OP At 3am in the morning during forum updates, the thread was linked to me again and I jokingly changed the poll name. I went to sleep after working on the forums all night, forgot to remove it, and it was removed in the morning when I woke up. The poll was removed as I saw no merit to the simple “yes/no” server dying question as it leads a very negative picture to anyone simply looking at a glance without proper background discussion. The discussion within the thread remains, and it was not trashed as there was some constructive discussion taking place. as for A-A-ron, my understanding is he made an official leaving thread, but followed that by spamming @ tags in a mass tag thread. This was dumb and warranted a warning. Double warned was most likely due to forum lag and a double click. Shortly after he returned, he created a thread aggressively bashing all of his “concerns” or dislike of the community. They were not constructive, nor did he offer any solutions or alternatives to improve the experience. It’s a tell-tale attitude of toxicity when you simply bash or degrade people/teams/ideas while offering zero productive solutions. I don’t personally believe the thread was made genuinely in reference to the wording and actions that was displayed previously. The banter and finger-pointing within the threads showed continued toxicity. Now. was the poll title change professional or warranted? No, but it was late night joke that was only meant to be in place for a few seconds and giggles. I will personally apologize for this and @Zim should not be blamed or his discretion questioned. He reviewed the thread, executed the ban, and locked it. It was temporarily modified later for memes. When you open a discussion simply focused on negative aspects while not offering alternatives, it’s usually met with harsh criticism — “Is America Dying” - Yes/No Present trump is retarded and being impeached We’re being invaded by illegal immigrants Cops are just shooting anyone on sight American cars suck and never worth buying — just out of curiosity, if I were to post the above on a political forum, what kind of response do you think I would receive? Beyond the above, I have zero knowledge of his history, background, or staff member interactions and thus I’m remaining neutral. A decision on the appeal will most likely be discussed and posted by a Founder after the holidays. stay frost

+1 seems very fun! Would be best on Event Server Events as less lag and more opportunity to use a gunship or have a starfight in the air.

+1 The perma ban was unjust. It was a general discussion, just seems that people dislike it when someone forms an opinion on them on this server.

Here's the previous ban appeal that has the stream on it boys. You guys can watch it and decide there, personally I think it's a pepega situation he got himself into... Also, pls don't mind the staff member that may or not be me abusing his powers like a 5head... -1

^ -1 1. Didn't Talk to the 104th HC about it. 2. Was Because He RANDOMLY STARTED SWIMMING!

@ whoever changed the post I really don't know who did it and I hope they see this post. If they don't, then just move it I guess. Question: Why was the contraversial poll changed? (linked below) Further Attachements: Concerns: IMO this was an unprofessional move on who changed it. It makes the community look bad. Also, Im not a legal expert but it could fall into some troubles. Such as Libel or Slander. (Again I'm no legal expert I just too 7th grade civics). Also of this post is going to cause any problems, that's not the intent. I'm genuinely concerned for the person who changed the post, as well as any one who wants to learn on the recent events of what just occured. I wouldn't want them to receive any misinformation. Also, please only respond to this if it pertains to you as it is the rules of the ask the staff section. And finally, if this seems sarcastic or facetious in any way, it's not. It is a genuine concern of mine.

-1 Going off a few things here 1. Wasn't even banned a week ago 2. It seems like most (if not all) of high staff and Ex-High staff agree with the ban, based on forum reactions/responses 3. From what I saw, what Aaron did warranted a ban. Arguing with directors never end well, and Aaron definitely went out of hand on this one. People keep on saying that the director went out of hand on this one as well, and I disagree. Directors are in their place for a reason and are suppose to have a certain level of respect given to them. If someone decides to make the mistake of fighting with them then that's on them, not the director.