Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/18/2018 in Posts
-
-1 Been denied about 4 times in the past and your reasoning is poor at best. No lore = no job. (Of coruse there may be actual lore but your effort is minimal).2 points
-
-1 and here's why. I dont agree with removing a regiment because then it will require ANOTHER vote to decide which one gets the boo. Secondly I think pilots is just fine right now and should stay this way. By not having pilots as a job in the 501st it allows PLT to coexist, so to speak, with our other regiments without hurting anyone's numbers. I think it would be better if pilot jobs are left to 104th, Hawk, and Oddball (Sorry if I missed any other named pilot character). While pilots are being allowed to fly a lot more lately it still isn't a lot and often limited to an LAAT and adding in another pilot job I think would only increase conflict of who gets to fly.2 points
-
Honestly I don't know why people outside the battalion -1 the suggestion just because It "might die". We currently have a dead whitelist that people don't use (a.ka Torrent Company Trooper), and we have a lot of people that are dedicated to being pilots, so why not give those people the ability to look like them, since the whitelist would actually be used instead of TCT.2 points
-
2 points
-
Did you talk to 104th, this suggestion has been denied like 3 times? Most denied because thing it’s useless anyways and because 104tu are the only that have the 104th pilots job2 points
-
Why not to fix all this "2ndAC get two buffs reeeeeee", why not we just remove the 100 health boost for 2nd AC so they just have jetpacks and the weapon they have for the class. Like that would solve all this, "they get this but I don't" shit. The reason Null have a boost is because there's literally the max of 12 of them in a battalion, and well there's more 501st than null and it will always be that way. Again RC have buffed weapons because they are a small squad of 4, and it's the weapons they use in lore. 104th WP get the same stuff as you, green company get a pistol. Alpha get the minigun thing because they are ARC's and had to work hard to get there. The DC-15a is actually really good for you guys. Lightning squadron get nothing, KU gets nothing, you shouldn't need a buff, you're elite, that should be enough2 points
-
Name: 91st ENG Sgt. Kalix Suggestion: The addition to the base ops branch of a lore naval captain Zak job and naval engineer job. Implementation: A separate job for Naval Captain Zak would be needed and this should be implemented because many battalions have lore characters such as Jesse, Waxer, and Draa but, naval doesn't really have anything so it is something that players can work towards and feel like they have a sense of progression within base ops. Zak would be chosen the same way that any lore character is chosen. The BCMD or CMD etc. would choose them. In this instance, it would be the admiral and vice admiral. The naval engineers would simply be those who are naval that have been trained to be engineers. They would have access to the job. Or it could be engineer officers (the people who train people to become engineers). It would be very immersive and I think it would make base ops a more interesting branch. Lore: Lore for Zak Lore for Naval engineer Workshop content if applicable: I will be making the models myself and would love to have the implemented onto the server! I will add the link to the workshop addon when I finish the models. If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: The addition of a Naval Captain Zak job and a naval engineer job. Job: Clone Naval Captain Zak Model: N/A at the moment. Weapons: The same loadout as any naval officer. Other: There should be only one slot. Job: Clone Naval Engineer Model: N/A at the moment. Weapons: The same loadout as any naval officer. Other: There should be no more than 10 slots.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
I'mma +1, if they want to get rid of the torrent company trooper job, which 501st really wants to do, because the job is dead af, would make sense to replace it with something that people would ACTUALLY USE.1 point
-
Have you tried talking to a Director+ privately about the issue regarding the past stance on this suggestion and how you hope to change it for the future? I feel you should do that before making another suggestion which will be linked to the previous just for being similar.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Well it's not just you guys. 104th has 17 jobs while again we only have 15. 104th also gets to drive AT-TEs and do Negotiations. The only thing special about 501st is the Named Characters.1 point
-
Well 501st has always had the max amount of jobs which have made it tricky for you guys to get new ones if you wounder why we are on your asses about "having too many jobs" all the time. Haven't been on for a couple of months so idk about the 212th jobs situation, but that was at least the problem when I was still active. anyways +11 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
could edit the suggestion because in this one it was said a new one will be made, but I don’t think one ever was1 point
-
I hate the reason that 501st gave up their pilot job, this was like 7 months ago. When no one who’s currently in the battalion was around, they had no say in that decision. So does that mean they should be effected by the decisions of past members, the people currently in charge of the battalion want it back. They clearly want the job lmao and o can see it being very useful. The 501st has, and I hate to say it a more popular piloting branch than 104th, they have clearly wanted it for a long time and should not be effected by the decisions of past members, with them not being able to change it.1 point
-
After searching for the suggestions here you go: -1 For all the reasons stated in these previous suggestions. (Yes I searched every page in the Denied section for this lol)1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
2nd AC jet pack medics 100 health boost, Alpha West-AR Minigun, RC all their RC weapons, Null have player buffs for each lore character, and probably others but all battalions all battalions have these some are for lore reasons others have other reasons but 501st have a measly DC-15A that was good for PvP for abou a month now it’s just a simple buff that isn’t much compared to others.1 point
-
Ask for a West-AR TC needs at least a Recon Weapon. Yeah they already have the buffed DC-15A but TC is an elite branch of the 501st and shouldn’t be held back because of it.1 point
-
as a expert lier i can say that this doesnt hold up my dude. when you get removed or warned for staff abuse the best idea is just to take it like a man, move on then reapply at a later date. disconnecting to escape isnt the solution and always will create more problems. i should know am im 90% sure i got a 6 month staff blacklist becuase my wifi went out but thats a rant for another day. my point is while you some good evidence over all it contridicts others whose options and testimonys will unfortunetly be more respected and belived then yours. also its pretty clear your lying -11 point
-
After looking at Zak in the show I don't really see the point in a whole new model for him as he is just a standard looking clone with nothing special about in terms of distinguishing features like scars unique hair ect. all he has is the communications head set that a lot of other random naval use so that on it's own may as well be a body group1 point
-
I am bringing it to Sarin now. Dont -1 because it didnt go through the CMD first this is a awesome suggestion. He even said he can make the model.1 point
-
I think you are a cool guy but jokes on the server usually get punished pretty hard.1 point
-
So you wait 8 days even though you used to be staff and should have found out immediately, didn't post an appeal or even try talking to high staff. Then pull out this appeal with some great alibi that is only supported by people who are your friends with to try and make it seem like Me and Dragon didn't see you with our own eyes on the SO job as a CSM? Do you not even want to address what we saw? Or are you just here to deny it ever even happened?1 point
-
Using others as examples doesn't strengthen your cause, it just pushes more of a "I want it cause they have it" sort of mentality. In my eyes at least it only worsens your request for a suggestion; This is not about 104th or 212th, this is and only is about 501st so keep it that way. Don't base what you want on what others have. Base it on what you intend to do with it, what plans you have for it, what benefits it will bring and why it should be approved other than just because you asked.0 points
-
Because everyone told me to first find this ticked and I was 2 days fucked up because of this ban @Bobonater3-1 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00