Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Name:Monty Suggestion: Make XO rank 2ndcmd, make BCMD rank Cmd and Cmd rank XO Implementation: change it so that instead of cmd we have XOs it would keep all authority the commander rank has same goes For 2ndcmd (Second in command) which would be equal to what the XO rank is now and once again same for Cmd rank it would be equal to what BCMD is right now Lore:There was no BCMD rank only CMD Workshop content if applicable:none The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Posted July 8, 2018 Name:Monty Suggestion: Make XO rank 2ndcmd, make BCMD rank Cmd and Cmd rank XO Implementation: change it so that instead of cmd we have XOs it would keep all authority the commander rank has same goes For 2ndcmd (Second in command) which would be equal to what the XO rank is now and once again same for Cmd rank it would be equal to what BCMD is right now Lore:There was no BCMD rank only CMD Workshop content if applicable:none The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 This is kinda a pointless suggestion but I thought it might be neat The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 This is kinda a pointless suggestion but I thought it might be neat The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Life- Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Suggestion was made once, Denied Once, and denied again. -1
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point (no offense) Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur
Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point (no offense) Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: The thing is, it does make more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: The thing is, it does make more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, Taur said: The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point (no offense) Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks
Posted July 8, 2018 3 minutes ago, Taur said: The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander. For once Monty does have a point (no offense) Neutral I suggest CMD (1) XO (1) COL But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, ccmonty said: No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change so multiple XO's?
Posted July 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, ccmonty said: No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change so multiple XO's?
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: so multiple XO's? Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: so multiple XO's? Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Just now, ccmonty said: Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands 8 minutes ago, Taur said: For once Monty does have a point I take it back
Posted July 8, 2018 Just now, ccmonty said: Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands 8 minutes ago, Taur said: For once Monty does have a point I take it back
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change cmd=xo xo=2ndcmd bcmd=cmd all powers remain the same just changing rank names The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change cmd=xo xo=2ndcmd bcmd=cmd all powers remain the same just changing rank names The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 7 minutes ago, Taur said: Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks Yeah but the point of this isn’t to add a rank (aside from 2ndcmd)just change some names The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 7 minutes ago, Taur said: Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks Yeah but the point of this isn’t to add a rank (aside from 2ndcmd)just change some names The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ccmonty said: So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change cmd=xo xo=2ndcmd bcmd=cmd all powers remain the same just changing rank names I really dont like the name "2ndCMD" But like I said, if we just rename BCMD -> CMD XO-> XO CMD -> COL COL-> LTC LTC -> MAJ MAJ -> CPT CPT -> LT 1LT = 1LT 2LT = 2LT and so on (ONLY RENAMING TO MAKE A LOT MORE SENSE) Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur
Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, ccmonty said: So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change cmd=xo xo=2ndcmd bcmd=cmd all powers remain the same just changing rank names I really dont like the name "2ndCMD" But like I said, if we just rename BCMD -> CMD XO-> XO CMD -> COL COL-> LTC LTC -> MAJ MAJ -> CPT CPT -> LT 1LT = 1LT 2LT = 2LT and so on (ONLY RENAMING TO MAKE A LOT MORE SENSE) Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: I really dont like the name "2ndCMD" But like I said, if we just rename BCMD -> CMD XO-> XO CMD -> COL COL-> LTC LTC -> MAJ MAJ -> CPT CPT -> LT True but that’s been rejected multiple times and that’s would be more complicated as multiple ranks would change not just 3 The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Taur said: I really dont like the name "2ndCMD" But like I said, if we just rename BCMD -> CMD XO-> XO CMD -> COL COL-> LTC LTC -> MAJ MAJ -> CPT CPT -> LT True but that’s been rejected multiple times and that’s would be more complicated as multiple ranks would change not just 3 The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Andrews Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) -1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. Edited July 8, 2018 by Andrews53
Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) -1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. Edited July 8, 2018 by Andrews53
BigZach Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 -1 Andrewsss took my points. Filthy theif 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
Posted July 8, 2018 -1 Andrewsss took my points. Filthy theif 1 "I'm not toxic. You're just making it really hard to not treat you like an idiot." - Logic
Taur Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, Andrews53 said: -1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. It was not denied, it was voided
Posted July 8, 2018 2 minutes ago, Andrews53 said: -1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. It was not denied, it was voided
Andrews Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Just now, Taur said: It was not denied, it was voided The same thing, it was voided because the suggestion was getting -1's. I still support my reasoning. In addition, most of the BCMDs like Cody and Bacara was Marshal Commanders in Lore. ( Credit to @Striker for telling me this, because I forgot <3)
Posted July 8, 2018 Just now, Taur said: It was not denied, it was voided The same thing, it was voided because the suggestion was getting -1's. I still support my reasoning. In addition, most of the BCMDs like Cody and Bacara was Marshal Commanders in Lore. ( Credit to @Striker for telling me this, because I forgot <3)
Metro Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 -1 System in place is known and works well. Don't need to fuck it up. "We'll get it done, Colonel. Six out."
Posted July 8, 2018 -1 System in place is known and works well. Don't need to fuck it up. "We'll get it done, Colonel. Six out."
Ccmonty Posted July 8, 2018 Author Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) jusr Saw another suggestion similar to this so ima void this. Sorry FOr the trouble Edited July 8, 2018 by ccmonty The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Author Posted July 8, 2018 (edited) jusr Saw another suggestion similar to this so ima void this. Sorry FOr the trouble Edited July 8, 2018 by ccmonty The ORIGINAL Forum Troll 1 time perma banned, 8 time staff member, 7 time staff removal recipient, Permanent 104th
Tackle Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Neutral. I am an avid roleyplayer, but with a server with the population that Synergy has; the serious-aspect of it cannot be fully achieved. I would love to have the ranks realistic, like back in the old Synergy days but people would complain. Raider.
Posted July 8, 2018 Neutral. I am an avid roleyplayer, but with a server with the population that Synergy has; the serious-aspect of it cannot be fully achieved. I would love to have the ranks realistic, like back in the old Synergy days but people would complain. Raider.
Nade Jones Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 -1 I don't think this particular system would work replacing the one we currently have. Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
Posted July 8, 2018 -1 I don't think this particular system would work replacing the one we currently have. Former: Commander Cody (x2), ATK Regimental Commander, SOBDE Regimental Commander, 212th XO, Omega Squad Lead Niner, Foxtrot XO, General Kenobi, HA (x2) TRM, GMM, RUS MP Commander
Esitt Posted July 8, 2018 Posted July 8, 2018 Voided as per request of the applicant //Locked //Moved to Server Suggestion - Denied
Posted July 8, 2018 Voided as per request of the applicant //Locked //Moved to Server Suggestion - Denied
Recommended Posts