Switch up some ranks

[Ccmonty]

Name:Monty

Suggestion: Make XO rank 2ndcmd, make BCMD rank Cmd and Cmd rank XO 

Implementation: change it so that instead of cmd we have XOs it would keep all authority the commander rank has same goes For 2ndcmd (Second in command) which would be equal to what the XO rank is now and once again same for Cmd rank it would be equal to what BCMD is right now

Lore:There was no BCMD rank only CMD

Workshop content if applicable:none

[Ccmonty]

This is kinda a pointless suggestion but I thought it might be neat

[Life-]

Suggestion was made once, Denied Once, and denied again.

-1

[Taur]

The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander.

For once Monty does have a point (no offense)

Neutral

I suggest
CMD (1)
XO (1)
COL

But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted

Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur

[Ccmonty]

1 minute ago, Taur said:

The thing is, it does make more sense to have only one Commander.

For once Monty does have a point

Neutral

I suggest
CMD (1)
XO (1)
COL

But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted

No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change 

[Taur]

3 minutes ago, Taur said:

The thing is, it does make a lot more sense to have only one Commander.

For once Monty does have a point (no offense)

Neutral

I suggest
CMD (1)
XO (1)
COL

But, a lot of people will -1 this because a lot of CMDs will be demoted

Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks

[Taur]

2 minutes ago, ccmonty said:

No the XO rank would equal what the CMD rank is now so no demotion just a rank name change 

so multiple XO's?

[Arroyo]

-1 no the system we have now is fine 

[Ccmonty]

1 minute ago, Taur said:

so multiple XO's?

Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands

[Taur]

 

Just now, ccmonty said:

Yeah I was debating weather to keep XOs they sane but in my mind it didn’t make much sense to have multiple 2nd in commands

 

8 minutes ago, Taur said:

For once Monty does have a point

 

 

I take it back

[Ccmonty]

So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change

cmd=xo

xo=2ndcmd

bcmd=cmd

all powers remain the same just changing rank names

[Ccmonty]

7 minutes ago, Taur said:

Actually we could just add the rank lieutenant so we can just move all the ranks

Yeah but the point of this isn’t to add a rank (aside from 2ndcmd)just change some names

[Taur]

4 minutes ago, ccmonty said:

So I would just like to say this would only change NAMES of ranks. All powers would remain the same as before the rank can change

cmd=xo

xo=2ndcmd

bcmd=cmd

all powers remain the same just changing rank names

I really dont like the name "2ndCMD"

But like I said, if we just rename
BCMD -> CMD
XO-> XO
CMD -> COL
COL-> LTC
LTC -> MAJ
MAJ -> CPT
CPT -> LT
1LT = 1LT
2LT = 2LT

and so on
(ONLY RENAMING TO MAKE A LOT MORE SENSE)

 

Edited July 8, 2018 by Taur

[Ccmonty]

1 minute ago, Taur said:

I really dont like the name "2ndCMD"

But like I said, if we just rename
BCMD -> CMD
XO-> XO
CMD -> COL
COL-> LTC
LTC -> MAJ
MAJ -> CPT
CPT -> LT


 

True but that’s been rejected multiple times and that’s would be more complicated as multiple ranks would change not just 3

[Banjans]

-1 There is no need for this.

[Andrews]

-1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. 

 

 

 

Edited July 8, 2018 by Andrews53

[BigZach]

-1 Andrewsss took my points. Filthy theif

[Taur]

2 minutes ago, Andrews53 said:

-1 | not needed. @Esitt Can we get a final decision on this because of 1. it's not needed 2. It's annoying when people don't understand what "denied" means, really pointless on trying when something was only denied one week ago. 

It was not denied, it was voided

[Andrews]

Just now, Taur said:

It was not denied, it was voided

The same thing, it was voided because the suggestion was getting -1's. I still support my reasoning. In addition, most of the BCMDs like Cody and Bacara was Marshal Commanders in Lore. ( Credit to @Striker for telling me this, because I forgot <3) 

[Striker]

-1, Not needed

[Metro]

-1 System in place is known and works well. Don't need to fuck it up.

[Conrad]

-1 i like how it currently is quite plainly. 

[Tybo]

-1

[Chambers]

-1 Just why

[Ccmonty]

jusr Saw another suggestion similar to this so ima void this. Sorry FOr the trouble 

Edited July 8, 2018 by ccmonty

[Luckyy]

-1

[Tackle]

Neutral.

I am an avid roleyplayer, but with a server with the population that Synergy has; the serious-aspect of it cannot be fully achieved. I would love to have the ranks realistic, like back in the old Synergy days but people would complain.

Raider.

[Nade Jones]

-1 I don't think this particular system would work replacing the one we currently have.

[Esitt]

Voided as per request of the applicant

//Locked

//Moved to Server Suggestion - Denied