Chambers Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 Bug Type (Server:): Jobs Severity level (1-3): 1 Evidence (if you can): Just switch to 41st ARC jobs GC and Normal Description of the bug: They got Jetpacks until the jet trooper got re-added and when jet trooper got re-added 41st ARC still kept the jet packs How can we recreate it: Switch to the jobs Only battalion that can have ARC jet troopers is RANCOR and only 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th
Posted January 26, 2019 Bug Type (Server:): Jobs Severity level (1-3): 1 Evidence (if you can): Just switch to 41st ARC jobs GC and Normal Description of the bug: They got Jetpacks until the jet trooper got re-added and when jet trooper got re-added 41st ARC still kept the jet packs How can we recreate it: Switch to the jobs Only battalion that can have ARC jet troopers is RANCOR and only 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th
Arroyo Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, Carter said: Only battalion that can have ARC jet troopers is RANCOR and only 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th We (2ndAC) are not getting the 2ndAC ARC class. We were planning to but there were too many cons and not that many pros. Maybe in the future but not right now I think your talking about ghost company Edited January 26, 2019 by Arroyo
Posted January 26, 2019 (edited) 15 hours ago, Carter said: Only battalion that can have ARC jet troopers is RANCOR and only 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th We (2ndAC) are not getting the 2ndAC ARC class. We were planning to but there were too many cons and not that many pros. Maybe in the future but not right now I think your talking about ghost company Edited January 26, 2019 by Arroyo
Dino Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 +1 didn't know this was a thing probs should be fixed soon.
Fizzik Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 16 hours ago, Carter said: noly 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th 2 Uhhhhh.... No. Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Posted January 26, 2019 16 hours ago, Carter said: noly 1 battalion can have more than 10 and thats 2nd AC of 212th 2 Uhhhhh.... No. Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Chambers Posted January 26, 2019 Author Posted January 26, 2019 Just now, Fizzik said: Uhhhhh.... No. I meant more than 10 jet troopers because of 2nd AC not that 2nd AC will have jet arc troopers only Rancor gets jet arc troopers
Author Posted January 26, 2019 Just now, Fizzik said: Uhhhhh.... No. I meant more than 10 jet troopers because of 2nd AC not that 2nd AC will have jet arc troopers only Rancor gets jet arc troopers
Fizzik Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 23 minutes ago, Carter said: I meant more than 10 jet troopers because of 2nd AC not that 2nd AC will have jet arc troopers only Rancor gets jet arc troopers I thought you meant they get more than 10 ARC troopers. Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Posted January 26, 2019 23 minutes ago, Carter said: I meant more than 10 jet troopers because of 2nd AC not that 2nd AC will have jet arc troopers only Rancor gets jet arc troopers I thought you meant they get more than 10 ARC troopers. Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Chambers Posted January 26, 2019 Author Posted January 26, 2019 14 minutes ago, Fizzik said: I thought you meant they get more than 10 ARC troopers. Yeah my bad with the wording 1
Author Posted January 26, 2019 14 minutes ago, Fizzik said: I thought you meant they get more than 10 ARC troopers. Yeah my bad with the wording 1
Fizzik Posted January 26, 2019 Posted January 26, 2019 30 minutes ago, Carter said: Yeah my bad with the wording np. Also 1000 Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Posted January 26, 2019 30 minutes ago, Carter said: Yeah my bad with the wording np. Also 1000 Rule-maker and rule-breaker.
Chambers Posted March 6, 2019 Author Posted March 6, 2019 I think Zim told me he fixed this so going to move this
Retired Founder Forseen Posted July 30, 2021 Retired Founder Posted July 30, 2021 This issue has been marked as resolved and therefore has been resolved on server or is unresolvable. // Locking // Moving to Resolved Reports
Retired Founder Posted July 30, 2021 This issue has been marked as resolved and therefore has been resolved on server or is unresolvable. // Locking // Moving to Resolved Reports
Recommended Posts