Jump to content

Bazoo

Member
  • Posts

    668
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Everything posted by Bazoo

  1. Bazoo

    Removing ARQ V2

    +1 ! Just dont go 4Head
  2. +1 get this outtie
  3. -1 SOBDE too OP :^) For real, fix this its been like this for months now LOL
  4. Just leave RC boom Fixed :^)
  5. but... is it really worth being perma ban tho Also the minging was behind closed door and it was already said that spooky didnt spawn the younglings. For the picture with spooky with his gun up someone butt, who cares really its in bunks behind closed doors.. this is literally where we told SOBDE to do their mingy stuff since even before you and me were a part of SOBDE
  6. A perma ban isnt to teach something to someone, its to get them to leave the community kinda like chronic boi. Spooky fucked up, he knows it. Should he get in trouble for what he did ? Probably, but is it really worth a perma ban ? Spooky is a old member of this community that can be somewhat mingy at times, but everytime I had to deal with him in SOBDE (like 1 or 2 times) Id just go in a channel with him talking and he would understand. What spooky did isnt worth a perma ban from my point of view but he still should get a slap on the hand. I will +1 this ban appeal and please unban him from in game or think about it, spooky is a good guy that means no harm to anyone. Maybe hit him up with like a week ban instead.
  7. It is kinda, but the small prob is, its a process that is only review by a small group friend, wich is why is too open to favoritism in my eyes. Im fine if it stays like this as long as jedi general isnt equal to HC, if it would be equal to HC, I think it should be a process open to the community.
  8. I agree with that, everything makes more sens lore wise, but look at the server, its serious RP but not really, people Dont RP what so ever as clone, they RP like themself within star wars. This is what I hate. And I support 100% making it more lore accurate, but then Jedi general should be with a application on forums and interview, so it stops favoritism, to an extent. I am also in favor in removing High command, as a previous High command member, I think HC is mostly useless and has no reason, its not even fun to RP as HC and they have a really hard time to Fill it.
  9. why bring a debate on this in PM, I feel like its important for the people to see this so it can help them make a choice ? its not a toxic argument we are just talking about it.
  10. Maybe for the +1 and stuff, but for the interview its a whole other thing. The application phase of a position is the small part, the big part is the interview that comes with it.
  11. They do it to clone all the time, clone has no vote what so ever on rules on them. Jedi gets to vote on almost everything, its not that bad, get over it. Also, we all know if they tried to bring this up to council it would have failed, who would +1 something that demotes them.. its just commun sens, somethings cannot be bring to council, its called conflict of interest.And im pretty sure it is director job to do this, its part of their job to manage the rules. Also have you even take a look at my suggestion ?
  12. Its not that hard honestly, also its not because something is hard to obtain that power should come with it, look at RC/Null tryouts, its a really hard tryouts (yes for some its really easy) but for 99% of the server its a hard one, and when passing you dont obtain more power. So the argument that its hard to obtain so it should get lot of power is terrible, find something better.
  13. why are people so triggered about it, it doesnt change anything really... 🤔 It looks like more of a power angry thing then anything else, have you tought about, making your rank as High command like it was before, but you have to be master+ and put an app on the forums for jedi generals ? that would make sens, since we all know most of the jedi order is full of favoritism and to clone to get that much power has to apply for it, so its only fair for jedi to apply to get the same power ? @Avavel
  14. Yes, but Kyle told us he would fix it whenever he is done with null, he would rework RC because some members of RC has no head and scorch miss a part of his backpack.
  15. I never got told it changed. im 99% sure its still a problem
  16. I mean it could be a good idea.... if we have a Palpy *insert omegalul* -1
  17. Its a suggestion it doesnt have to pass, I just think its a fair claim. Regimental should have their regiment main weapon.
  18. We do have a big loadout, but you dont think it makes sense for the Regimental to have his regiment main blaster ?
  19. I was first told before my reg app, if i get reg i was allowed to give myself the rc blaster, but after i got reg they director talked about it and told me to do a suggestion, i dont really care if it fails
  20. Rc blaster is better close range
  21. I will be able to choose between both Main blaster, so either DC-17m Blaster rifle, or Null Westar. If your question is ATK reg having RC blaster no he cant.
  22. Name:Bazoo Suggestion: Each regimental can call an admin or give to themself if they are an admin, one of their regiment main blaster exemple: ATK reg can receive any 212th or 501st DC-15a or GM westar etc for other High command. They all get the respective weapon from one of their battalion. Implementation: You can in the future, if you make a job for each reg, add it to the loadout (the current reg will choose wich weapon he will receive in his loadout for the future) Lore: There is none really, but why couldnt they use the weapon of their regiment, also Buffed dc-15a isnt lore anyway. Workshop content if applicable: we already have it (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: ADD Job:Regimental Model: Weapons: Either being given by an admin or later when the founders are done with all of what they currently have to do add it to the loadout if they make a job for each REG. Given a weapon of their choice of one of their regiment. Other: I assume this might get denied, but we will not know if we dont try.
  23. inb4 Zim close any server suggestion because everyone keep asking for weapons
  24. Also, naval are pilots and engineers not leaders.
×
×
  • Create New...