Jump to content

Maddoxx

Member
  • Posts

    940
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by Maddoxx

  1. Honestly I've never heard of this issue before, so I have no clue all I could think would be Have you verified the props you are using are ones we have on server? Is it under the prop limit for what you can spawn on server? Other then that I'm not too sure maybe @Mavelle or @Daytona211 may know as they do GM stuff a lot more then myself.
  2. This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED
  3. After speaking with server High Command, Rancor Command, and going over the responses in the thread we have come to the following decision on this suggestion. The proposed update to how ARC trainings are done on server will be approved in full. The proposed recertification of currently ARC trained individuals will be DENIED.
  4. Pending To be reviewed by the Server Directors
  5. Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED
  6. @Omalic
  7. I’ll be honest, I handle a good amount of bans so I truly don’t remember this one. I asked @Katyabout it and they remembered it as involving the used a slur in this situation. With that being the case it would line up with the 6mo as that’s the ban length for shit like that. also gonna tag @Fyias he has to make the call on this one.
  8. I wouldn’t give permission to wipe arc trainings or do any forum of re-certification unless it passed a community suggestion. Changing just the training however is in full control of them so long as it doesn’t effect any currently trained members status.
  9. Unfortunately your ban appeal has been DENIED. For more information on why you were denied, please contact me or any Director+. // LOCKED // MOVED TO BAN APPEALS - DENIED
  10. Question Answered
  11. It was 3 months from the start due to that being the norm when we broke off from ice fuse. Term limits were introduced originally due to a BCMD that was also a HA and while he wasn’t active on his BCMD he did a lot of back end HA work and the battalion loved him. The only way to get rid of a BCMD back then was to report them and anytime someone in the battalion would they would receive major backlash. So they implemented 2 month term limits for BCMD and 3 months for everything higher. That was the system for a while and at some point leadership decided deferent term lengths was dumb so they were all standardized to 3 month limits.
  12. This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  13. Even if Staff go back to training they will not be allowed to deny CT WL to someone if they seem mingey. This would not only be a huge discrimination but like 80% of players join the server just to minge and end up staying as full players. I know I did. Handling all of those issues you just listed is a CG/TG thing not a staff issue. Staff should not step in on a situation that can be handled by in game resources such as a jail time and nobody should ever "monitor" CTs. Basically everything you said in this paragraph is the wrong way we want thing handled. New players are a very rare thing, most people have played CWRP before as such that is the point of this test. Not to be lazy and not train but there's no point in us telling them the same info every CWRP server says. That said when there are new players they still get trained by a staff member most of the time as they request one in chat. We already keep count of this .-. including those who take the test and those who don't. This wouldn't get you promoted faster. You get promoted out of NA when we feel you have a decent understanding of your job as a staff member not when you do X amount of tickets. That would be as stupid as thinking we don't track players joining, or that staff should do every CC training.
  14. Big dumb. Test works fine, people will still minge one way or another not gonna try and waste my staff team's time on training when the CC test does it fine.
  15. Question Answered
  16. We feel the rules are in a good spot regarding the IP Jokes. The rules were recently relaxed after feedback and as they are now we as server leadership feel there is no just cause or need for the rules to be edited any further in regard to this matter.
  17. Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  18. Sure come get online and you can help build it.
  19. now how you spell my name. but yea I like it.
  20. Yes I went out of my way to go find your youtube channel to respond to a ban appeal. I truly am a criminal mastermind. Like I said I had a ban request ticket, (cropped names out due to privacy reasons) this is just the link you sent my guy.
  21. The original ban was a 30 day ban from VA Poker for advertising I updated the ban to perm as per ban rules all advertising is permanent. The link that was submitted in the request was https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr7RyxDRGE1ldyqIjz9Z82g a link to a youtube channel by the same name and profile picture as mr @Limited here. I don't even know you, I just update bans bro. Sure my reason I put may be a bit unprofessional but the ban was valid and the request for perm was also.
  22. This suggestion has been VOIDED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED
  23. This suggestion has been ACCEPTED. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - ACCEPTED
  24. -1 Z6 is fine for what it is, a mid range suppressive fire weapon. As for you not able to hit anything, maybe just get good?
  25. The original suggestion is just to add it to the heavy job to give something extra to the class.
×
×
  • Create New...