Duck

Name: Duck Staff Rank: Veteran Admin SteamID: STEAM_0:1:50121683 Length of LOA (Please specify date if possible): 3/4 - 3/9 (5 Days) Reason: I should of taken this loa probably yesterday, however after checking with my schedule and everything, due to tests I am currently crammed and just cant find time to get on server (if at most I can get on for like 20-30 Minutes a day) Do you understand that if you go LOA on a named Jedi Character for more than two weeks, go on LOA on any RC character, or go LOA while being clone commander, you will be removed from that position: Yes Do you understand that if you are going on LOA for more than two weeks you may lose your leadership position?: Yes (Dont have a leadership position)

-1. Korm not gonna lie you are one of the only people I like that came out of cipher's kal term. In my opinion you cleaned up his shit. However I believe with you being away from the squad and as you said you are already being burnt out in a position that isnt as important in activity(most of the shit high command has to handle is the framework of the battalions). With that all in combination with already talking to the other applicants plan for SOBDE and him wanting to make a name for himself this 2nd time through kal, I feel he at the current moment is a better fit.

+1 . Was Kal before and basically was approved during the Meeting by the "Council Of Kals." Seems very competent and I trust him to lead the Vod pretty well.

Name: Duck | Mereel Who helped (If applicable): Fizzik | Jack | Bolt | Hades Event Name: Galactic Conquest BVB Simulation Summary of the story: It was a Galactic Conquest with a PVE twist. What was the result of the event?: One team won. Was this more of a role play oriented or "shoot em up" oriented event: Shoot Em up https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jxdlkufEIfmdILeVrwBcsJyOckr4a5JrB7GKH5hqHAs/edit?usp=sharing Doc I attempted to follow for my event Please Rate using template as follows Story: - (The storyline of the event) Execution: - (Flow/Timing) Game Mechanics - (Spawning/map utilization/Ej’s) Overall: [Rating] - [Reason] Story: [Rating] - [Reason] Execution: [Rating] - [Reason] Game Mechanics: [Rating] - [Reason]

+1 However this is a little iffy. As it depends on how much it costs to host the server(Probably does not need to be on a strong box for it) also it depends on how frequent it is used. If its only being used like once every two days then this is a no needed cost for the server that could go to other developments of the server. I feel this would have to be closely monitored if it was added to see if it truly being used.

@Tyennoch My bad I forgot to @ you yesterday however I am back

+1 Unless we bring back the breaker model(Fuck all of you I miss it)

Name: Duck | Mereel Staff Rank: VetAdmin SteamID: STEAM_0:1:50121683 Length of LOA (Please specify date if possible): Reason: Have been feeling like absolute shit and sick since Tuesday and was hoping to be better by now however that's not the case Do you understand that if you go LOA on a named Jedi Character for more than two weeks, go on LOA on any RC character, or go LOA while being clone commander, you will be removed from that position: Yes Do you understand that if you are going on LOA for more than two weeks you may lose your leadership position?: Yes

+1

I already said that. NO ONE READS MY POSTS ;-;

Bug Type (Server:): Clonewars Severity level (1-3): 1(not that important as you can easily fix it yourself ingame) Evidence (if you can): Don't really want to record myself click my mouse button IRL and my screen as thats too much work Description of the bug: Putting the z6 on safety then unsafety proceeds to make the gun unshootable. To renable shooting on the weapon you have to have the z6 have the weapon unsafety swap weapons and swap back. How can we recreate it: Hop on heavy job or spawn a z6 in-server proceed to put weapon on safety and unsafety then try to shoot.

Your not wrong on loot @Dennis however fucking place is aids to extract.

As long as we dont do reserves. Place is a fucking warzone Edit: nevermind I just read the later half of the post.

+1

Name: Duck | Mereel Skirata Who helped (If applicable): Attie(Jack) HE HELPED LARGELY. THIS EVENT LASTED TWO HOURS AND REQUIRED ALOT OF SPAWNING AND MICRO MANAGING IN WHICH HE LARGELY HELPED WITH. Event Name: Simulation Code-named [Warcraft] Summary of the story: This is a run-through of the event with pictures. What was the result of the event?: Troopers managed to complete the simulation. Was this more of a role play oriented or "shoot em up" oriented event: shoot em up [ More of a MMO Raid themed event]

+1 However only on venator extensive. Map is huge as fuck which is one of its down sides. During off periods it can take forever to get somewhere and if you die in a sim you have to walk your happy ass 5 minutes to get back, if your one of the unfortunate fools that dont own a TAC. As I said though this is only needed on the venator.

+1, although you havent been in Bad batch, squads are virtually the same structure wise however roleplay wise they vary. I feel you are able to tackle both as you were a previous squad lead and know how to handle squads and also are very proficient in researching a individual/squads lore and making sure everyone follows the correct RP.

+1, so yes he left Bad batch, however as a squad member positions and due to other inner battalion problems he couldn't really do much to fix the problems. as everyone always says "it was out of his hands." However Kojak in my opinion was very activte on the server, knew how to RP properly, and was active in the channel when deployed/etc which leads me to believe he will be a good squad lead.

+1

Imagine having almost 4 to 5x my post count but only 200 more views LMAO. Nothing but sitting on an old account lmao <3

+1

8/10

+1, atleast one of the OG 91st is coming back ;-;

"27th Arf trooper"

"Im on my senator one time a week" Like I probably shouldnt have a say here. But holy shit if your only gonna play a RP character once a week, you should not be that RP character. You are just holding the spot hostage at that point. For this reason I would agree with your Removal and honestly -1 to this Commander Report.