Old Spartan

WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK? nothing said to me except for 10 seconds in TS. You mentioned this like CG was just talking about this not that you actually posted this. WITHOUT MY PERMISSION. A FAT -1 and VOID THIS

@Ccmonty Yes this is just permission to test stuff with the WP Trooper

@Hero @Taur I wanted to give this a test. Im aware of its past issues in the 104th, that's why im asking for the test. Also when I asked about doing this test I was told to put it into a server suggestion. So yes I have to go through this process.

Name: Spartan | 104th BCMD Wolffe Suggestion: Change the 104th Jet Trooper, into the Wolfpack trooper. Implementation: This would be a name change ONLY. This is just a test run to see how the Wolfpack trooper job would hold up. (LET ME CLARIFY! THE JT JOB TITLE WILL STAY! THE TROOPERS ON THE JOB WILL CHANGE THEIR NAME!) Lore: N/A Workshop content if applicable: N/A (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: 104th Jet Trooper to Wolfpack Trooper Job: 104th Jet Trooper Model: 104th Jet Trooper Weapons: 104th DC_15s, and DC_15A (The same load out the Jet Trooper Currently Has) Other: N/A If there are any questions or comments regarding this please feel free to speak with me about it.

-1 for perma, +1 for shorten to 4 or more weeks. This shit ain't cool, and @Carter said it all. There's enough drama without someone intentionally trying to start shit while impersonating a founder.

Its not. you are still responsible for your actions, inebriated or not. -1

+1 It only makes sense, its another tool in the game masters tool bag. There's no reason not to add one.

-1 If were gonna start adding any ships, it'd be more misc civilian, pirate, and CIS ships

-1 To all the rank changes. We dont need 5 different WO's, 1stSgt is a rank and not a title, XO is a billet, they are a CMDR but have more authority than a regular CMDR. HOWEVER! +1 To changing CC to CR. Helps to remove some confusion.

+1 Idk how this would be implemented or if it even can be but its a good idea.

I have a feeling that's because everyone who has -1'd this prior to him has said everything already.

Someone get this man a medal XD XD

This is basically background on the situation and my feelings towards shakes about this. So I am little salty about this. There was one incident with one of my pilots and yall trying to transport a trooper. So I go to you like a man and we talk about this like men. We agree that a pilot in the front has nothing to do with the CG securing a prisoner in the back. We also agree that as a solution to prevent further conflict when CG has someone to transport they would check to see if any pilot jobs are on (if so call them to the laat to fly and the pilot follows the orders of the CG commander in the back) If no pilot jobs are on then it defers to a trained CG pilot. We also agreed that after that discussion the issue would be dropped. Yet here you are bringing this up again in your second server suggestion. Its nice to know you cant stand by your word. Lastly what I really don't appreciate (on top of you going back on your word) is during my conversation with you and the conversation chop had with you is threatening us with going to the Directors or Zim to get this rule changed because you quote "Don't like it". SO HERE ARE MY RESPONSES: This was literally the purpose of the discussion I had with Shakes but that was thrown out the window, also your correct there isnt a single pilot seen. Were assuming that the pilots that are in the laats are cg because everyone else is. As i've previously stated an indecent happened and we resolved it, apparently that wasn't enough. As well as Zyner is correct here CG's job is to secure the prisoner not fly them. There isn't a correlation between that and flying. Almost every battalion did at one point, and everyone chose at some point or another not to have them or to remove them for other things. Yes they should be able to fly anytime there is something to fly, ITS THEIR ONLY JOB. While it may only be 10 seconds or what ever that's their 10 seconds that's being taken from them. The server has strict rules about flying vehicles so their opportunity's are limited. Your correct you battalion is very lore heavy, so why make a suggestion that has no lore to back it up. While simultaneously ditching the agreement we made. This is literally an attempt to circumvent the current rules about pilot jobs. Because named pilots have the priority and y'all didn't like that or the AGREEMENT I made with shakes this suggestion was created. Lastly -1 for everything stated above.

@Bbstine Only part of this is still an issue. The heavy still does not have the 104th armor buff, and the Sharpshooter class is still on the server. The green text has been fixed.

Name: Wolfpack Lead XO Comet | Spartan Suggestion: Whitelist all the props in the prop packs for SWRP. If there are props that shouldn't be white listed such as large ships and such remove them from the prop packs. My reasoning for this is to make building easier for all people. So game masters know exactly what the have to work with when making an event and people building offline don't have to go back and forth to see if things are blacklisted. Implementation: No idea how it would work. Lore: Lore isn't necessary for this suggestion. Workshop content if applicable: The current prop packs used by synergy role play.

+1 Chop said it all. You signed up for the responsibility.

+1 Seems like a good replacement until the scopes can be fixed.

+1 If its possible and not a ton of work go for it. But if its a ton of work just let the event jobs no target themselves.

+1 the ban appeal process exists for a reason, it should be followed as such. How ever I understand the necessity of the general randomness and antics of Dill help to break the monotony of the server. A careful balance between bending the rules and breaking them is needed. What isnt right is -1ing this and just saying "I LOVE DILL" favoritism shouldn't be tolerated especially when the people who make the rules break them. Overall this report is valid, the action that should be taken towards Dill is simply a "hey tone it down a bit next time" this is a mountain out of a mole hill.