Taur
-
Posts
744 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Taur
-
-1 not needed
-
Chambers: He said he was going to go start shit in synergy and was soliciting others to send the messages to him so he could cause drama. Just cut out the middleman and gave him his wish. -1
-
+1
-
Yes, but there are a lot of times where there isnt even enough naval to open the gates, I feel like this would make that problem even bigger
-
Uhm thats going to be a lot of work and I really don't see how more work would improve naval/baseops. because if naval is up there who is at the gates?
-
can someone accept this already
-
+1 After carefully reading this app, I'd say you deserve a second chance (this is a meme libtards)
-
Good. +1
-
+1
-
-1 way too many bans
-
OOC THEATER
-
+1 I was there, people who joined were, or people who memed or people who wanted to play DarkRP.
-
+1 for both
-
+1 and PLEASE add the respawn timer and maybe even up it. Make dying something that you want to prevent, if the event is not one life I see way too many people just rush and not care about dying, again, make dying something you want to prevent.
-
-1 RECON gets speed boosts, were are not giving heavies more HP/armor and stuff. like Spooky said, position yourself better
-
Imma be honest, I recommend voiding this and make another appeal where you tell everything
-
Alright I asked someone to check your bans: 1st: MRDM + Failrp (a week) 2nd: Disobeying staff + NITRP (1 day) 3rd: Failrp + NITRP + Disrespect + RDM (3 days) 4th: Order 66 (3 days) That's going to be a -1 from me
-
What were you banned for in those 4 bans?
-
Spectate has been broken for a while, I recommend just typing "!spectate" and no steamID/name so you can just fly around in spectate and not players directly. It's better than cloaked no colliding as there is no way that they can see your name.
-
+1
-
Mhn, I do remember when 104th had non named WP troopers which were pretty much useless. Look at 501st rn, they want their TC trooper removed as it is pretty much useless. I'd say -1 but I don't think you need to make a suggestion about this as I think it would be a lot easier to just let the job name be the same and just let them change their name.
-
Who's Online 3 Members, 0 Anonymous, 94 Guests (See full list)
