Leaderboard
.thumb.png.ecbe67a9d110b57a21025aca449e93af.png)
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/12/2022 in Posts
-
The issue with this is permaprops are saved to the server and thus are sitting in the database whether we are on the map that they're saved on or not and thus constantly checks the server to ensure we aren't on the map in which they are required for. This creates a large chunk of unnecessary lag on any and all maps we are on.4 points
-
Name: Conrad RP Rank: Overseer Suggestion: Remove the new battalion structure defined here: Implementation: Go back to 3-3-3 battalion structure, remove the 4th regimental. Other: In the current state of the server we need less applicable positions of oversight, doing stuff like this bloats up the top level that we can't even fill properly. Reverting it will put one less position that will sit open.3 points
-
+1. This is the same thing i try to explain to people that try to get Investigators back. If we can't fill 3 lead positions theres no reason to add more.1 point
-
I dont propose being on the venator for 2 1/2 days. Read my post. Using it for literally a few hours to RP going to another planet would be insanely different than sitting on it and spamming pilot events for 48 hours. I've used this map its actually pretty good.1 point
-
Alright, alright. No Venator. We can do an Arquetin-Class Cruiser instead.1 point
-
how is this suggestion a downgrade? it only adds things. it brings more variety to the server and opportunity's for events and encounters.1 point
-
bro tryna downgrade -10 points
-
I agree. -10 points
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00