Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/04/2018 in Posts

  1. -1 First you guys ask for an LAAT to be added just because it has your markings/colors or whatnot. Now you want a job specifically to fly it. On top of the whole argument that previously happened over piltos, it's clear you're not over it as you stated you were and still seeking to remedy it. CG goes into the LAAT and secures the person inside, you don't need an actual CG pilot (or to make it where only CG can fly). I haven't even seen a CG Pilot in lore because they would just get clone pilots instead because they're trained for flying. On the opposing side, if the entire purpose of the CG Pilot is to fly the CG LAAT, this means he would be useless during events or deployment because other Pilots can fly the regular LAATs since he's restricted, or specifically brought in, for the CG LAAT. Of course that's an extreme view but why would it not be a thing since you'll make it where only CG Pilot can fly the CG LAAT, may as well make it just that.
    3 points
  2. This is basically background on the situation and my feelings towards shakes about this. So I am little salty about this. There was one incident with one of my pilots and yall trying to transport a trooper. So I go to you like a man and we talk about this like men. We agree that a pilot in the front has nothing to do with the CG securing a prisoner in the back. We also agree that as a solution to prevent further conflict when CG has someone to transport they would check to see if any pilot jobs are on (if so call them to the laat to fly and the pilot follows the orders of the CG commander in the back) If no pilot jobs are on then it defers to a trained CG pilot. We also agreed that after that discussion the issue would be dropped. Yet here you are bringing this up again in your second server suggestion. Its nice to know you cant stand by your word. Lastly what I really don't appreciate (on top of you going back on your word) is during my conversation with you and the conversation chop had with you is threatening us with going to the Directors or Zim to get this rule changed because you quote "Don't like it". SO HERE ARE MY RESPONSES: This was literally the purpose of the discussion I had with Shakes but that was thrown out the window, also your correct there isnt a single pilot seen. Were assuming that the pilots that are in the laats are cg because everyone else is. As i've previously stated an indecent happened and we resolved it, apparently that wasn't enough. As well as Zyner is correct here CG's job is to secure the prisoner not fly them. There isn't a correlation between that and flying. Almost every battalion did at one point, and everyone chose at some point or another not to have them or to remove them for other things. Yes they should be able to fly anytime there is something to fly, ITS THEIR ONLY JOB. While it may only be 10 seconds or what ever that's their 10 seconds that's being taken from them. The server has strict rules about flying vehicles so their opportunity's are limited. Your correct you battalion is very lore heavy, so why make a suggestion that has no lore to back it up. While simultaneously ditching the agreement we made. This is literally an attempt to circumvent the current rules about pilot jobs. Because named pilots have the priority and y'all didn't like that or the AGREEMENT I made with shakes this suggestion was created. Lastly -1 for everything stated above.
    2 points
  3. Name: 212th Battalion Commander Cody Suggestion: Firstly, removal of the 2ndAC sub-unit and all jobs within and instead adding a 2ndAC job too the 212th category.That job will have a DC-15A scoped, DC-15S, DC-17, jetpack. Secondly, removal of Ghost Company Lead Job. The adding of a support job instead, which would use the Boil and Waxer ARF Camo without the markings and have a medkit,repair tool,DC-15A scoped, and DC-15S. As well as adding a jetpack to the Ghost Company ARC similar to green company ARC. The reason for all of this removal is due to 212th having two sub units and by removing one to allow K-Company to be re-introduced into the server. This suggestion was approved and decided by 212th High Command Implementation: Remove 2ndAC category, add 2ndAC Trooper to 212th main category, add support trooper and a Jetpack too the Ghost Company ARC Lore:None? Workshop content if applicable: (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") If you are asking to add or change a job, fill out the following Add or Change: Change/Remove Job: All 2ndAC Jobs / 2ndAC Jobs Category Model:N/A Weapons:N/A Other:N/A Add or Change: Remove Job: Ghost Company Commander Model:N/A Weapons:N/A Other:N/A Add or Change: Add Job: Ghost Company Support Trooper Model:The Waxer ARF Model (No idea of its actual name sorry) Weapons:, DC-15A scoped, and DC-15S Other:medkit, repair tool Add or Change: Change Job: Ghost Company ARC Model:N/A (Until new models at least) Weapons:n/a (Current Loadout) Other: Jetpack , Clone mini gun Add or Change: Add Job:2ndAC Trooper(Or just Airborne Trooper) Model:N/A(Until new models at least) Weapons:DC-15A scoped, DC-15S, DC-17, Other:Jetpack
    1 point
  4. lol all of these arguments are stupid af, I think every battalion should have pilots honestly. but +1
    1 point
  5. -1 you already get your own LAAT and you can set up a PLT program for CG theres not even a pilot in the video lol
    1 point
  6. RP Name: TRM CT ARCL Captain Sock Steam ID: STEAM_0:1:73872736 Suspected Player's Name: Patrick/"DELTA 42 Pilot Fang" Suspected Player's Steam ID (If applicable): STEAM_0:0:230244062 Rule Suspected Player Broke: FailRPing as a job that does not exist. Explain to us what happened: For the past two days know, Patrick has run about the ship as "DELTA 42" a job that does not exist and has not been approved in the server suggestions. The situation arises that Boss and Regimentals "approved this" despite decisions like this needing to go through the server suggestions. The clear plausible explanation as to why Patrick has this ridiculous position is obvious and absurd. yet for some reason I am told by his protectorates that I need to "go to someone else". Unfortunately I didn't get screenshots immediately cause I expected him to change his name and move on but apparently he is also planning on paying for a model for DELTA 42 who once again, does not exist. The only laughable argument I got as to why this is allowed is because I am a ranked CT and I have ARC training? Which is irreverent to the argument and an attempt to compare two different situations that don't correlate. Really this situation is Patrick getting away with failrp as a makeup rank and job which is unacceptable. If we are a community that is gonna allow people to get away with shit cause of FEELINGS and overstepping rules and boundaries that are in place then thats fucked. I will repeat once again, DELTA 42 does not EXIST and CANNOT be approved by "Boss and Regimentals" without a server suggestion so if Patrick continues to walk around as such then it is FAIL RP and he needs to be met with consequences. Evidence (If applicable):
    1 point
  7. +1 he is a admin he should know how to follow rules
    1 point
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...