Wolfro Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 (edited) Name: Wolfro / Hawk / Mundi RP Rank: SGM / Jedi Master Suggestion: Replacing the TX-130 and the LAAT for better optimized models and to remove some of the distractions our current ones have for better immersion. Implementation: Replacing the two Current vehicles listed above Lore: The TX-130 and TX130t were utilized by the grand army of the republic during the clone wars. It was a hover tank utilized on various terrains during ground incursions. The LAAT/i was a low atmospheric assault transport that helped ferry troops from and to the battlefield and was capable of support troops with at-rt walkers and barc speeders loaded in their cargo bay. Workshop content if applicable: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1952443043&searchtext=TX-130 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2588369575&searchtext=LAAT%2FI (If no workshop content, suggest a developer or put "Require Development") Edited January 24, 2023 by Wolfro 1 Report Link to comment
Bacta Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 I would rather we switch to LVS, a newer updated version of the vehicles that fixes alot of the issues with LFS a direct upgrade it seems posted here https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2919757295 fuck @Guac 1 Report Link to comment
Wolfro Posted January 24, 2023 Author Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 I understand theirs a new system but at the same time these two suggestions are to increase not only immersion but can help in many different aspects for example the LAAT can carry barcs to and from the battlefield to help with RP and also carry 22 passengers. This Laat has a crash system instead of just blowing up. It also has 3 gunner positions so response can be greatly effects with areas of control from the pilot and co pilot to the rear gunner so the LAAT is more versatile. The TX-130 can help by not having the person sticking out half way of the tank and also still receive medical aid. In this variant the person is in the cockpit in the tank and looks through a view port and fully covered their an option for a top turret with or without. Also if you utilize the spacebar rocket pods actually deploy from the sides and with the right click you fire missiles. 1 Report Link to comment
Gatsby Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 With this I personally agree with this one atleast, with the addition of carrying 22 passengers it also allows transportation of smaller vehicles as stated in wolfro's response, AT-RTs, along with BARCs with can help with immersive events/deployments. +1 1 Report Former: Delta-07 Sev|Rancor Hammer|Omega-15 Fi Current: CG SUP PFC Gatsby Link to comment
Dingle Posted January 24, 2023 Report Share Posted January 24, 2023 +1 I like the suggestion i like the idea of bigger vehicles 1 Report Link to comment
Misfit Posted January 30, 2023 Report Share Posted January 30, 2023 +1 until LVS comes out and this breaks lmao the Darman Keller guy Link to comment
Coordinator Xaze Posted February 21, 2023 Coordinator Coordinator Report Share Posted February 21, 2023 Unfortunately, this suggestion has been DENIED. If the same suggestion is submitted again within 60 DAYS of this post it will be automatically denied. // LOCKED // MOVED TO [CW] SERVER SUGGESTIONS - DENIED Quote Denial reasons: (These are some reasons that your suggestion might get denied for.) Not providing sufficient information. Ex: Just linking the workshop and not giving us the actual model path you want to use. The addon's size is way too big compared to its content(s). Ex: 35mb for one model. Lack of feedback. Ex: Post has been up for 3 weeks and only received 1-10 votes. Majority negative feedback. Bad optimization and/or causes bad performance on the server. Having multiple suggestions within one thread. Bothering leadership/development team regarding a suggestion. Suggesting a previously denied suggestion within 60 days of denial. We're looking to move to LVS, these are not compatable with LVS yet. We can relook at this when they're introduced in LVS. Link to comment
Recommended Posts