-
Posts
723 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bane
-
-
1/1/1
This event is a classic case of a GM overlooking aspects to their event and then punishing the players for finding the aspects they overlooked. Look, as a GM you can simply ask people to not skip over your event. "Hey I didn't have enough props to cover over x, please don't use it to skip", "Hey there's an issue with my rayshield here, please don't skip it", etc. That is not what happened. Instead I got my balls stomped on by hordes of perfect accuracy T21 droids because my battalion decided to be crafty and find an alternative solution to the deployment. You think you're solving a problem, but you never asked anyone to play the event linearly. You gave us an objective and told us to go, and so we did. And we got punished for it. That fucking sucks, and it goes to show what the GM team is coming down to. We're not meant to strategize or RP anymore, we're supposed to throw ourselves at the event in a linear fashion and thank the GM for slapping us in the face with his greasy balls. -
-
-
+1, DS really needs an overhaul to be effective at their jobs
-
-
+1 Give people a reason to go to the guild hall
-
+1 Sick of tarkin's stupid ass haircut I cannot take him seriously
-
-1 Git good at force jump
-
+1 Please give me reasons to arrest more people
-
+1, Please for the love of god
-
9 minutes ago, Jayarr said:
I feel like a middle ground needs to met here though. Game masters were not happy with me when I put props around and cluttered areas they wanted to build in. So, perhaps some buildings should have props (cantina, guild hall, whatever else), while the other 'misc' buildings would remain empty
Agreed, some buildings, (that see heavy every day use), should be kitted out with props built into the map. Others, like villagers' homes or maybe a hidden smuggling den, should remain relatively empty. I think the core of what we want is spaces built with the consideration of the type of RP happening there
-
10 hours ago, Jayarr said:
What is an ideal village in the eyes of the community? Obviously not everyone will agree, but a general consensus wouldn’t go amiss. I thought I did right by onderons, but it seems not. The feedback would be welcome for any future projects.
I want to reiterate that Onderon was not a bad map, I think the issue is more about how we utilize civilian in general. The server is definitely Jedi/Clone centric, and our maps reflect that. It leads to a lot of civilian players feeling gimped because they don't also have a fully functional space or outpost to do their civilian things. I think Thesh was definitely the most disappointing part of Onderon. Having a Republic outpost, or better yet a neutral fortified outpost, with an interesting design and construction would have been far better than a SWTOR prop. When we treat Civilian, Jedi, and Republic as equal in terms of how much consideration and utility their spaces are given I think it honestly helps all three factions. If there were more enterable spaces in the Onderon village of varied design it would have made the village more fun in just day to day interactions. Whether you're a clone patrol kicking in doors for contraband or a clan of hunters smuggling goods, those varied spaces would have made things more interesting in combat and roleplay
-
7 hours ago, Cucumber said:
Personally I loved Sith when it was here... but what would you do to ensure it doesn't end up like last time? As you can see it isn't a thing anymore.... so how would you ensure it's better this time around? That would be one of the biggest issues with Sith... making sure it doesn't turn into a repeat of history.
I mean it still happens with clone battalions periodically. It's why we have HC, if someone is being cringe management and HC take care of it. I think having preventative measures, like anti-toxicity/elitism rules, is good, but ultimately they won't stop everyone who wants to be a dickhead. If we, using Brooklyn's example, had Shadow collective on the server part of their whole deal would be about being self serving, playing political games, etc. It comes with part of the territory of having "evil" factions on the server, all we can do is clearly delineate the line between RP and OOC toxicity and have punishments in place for when people cross the line
-
9 minutes ago, Jayarr said:
What is an ideal village in the eyes of the community? Obviously not everyone will agree, but a general consensus wouldn’t go amiss. I thought I did right by onderons, but it seems not. The feedback would be welcome for any future projects.
I think primarily we want functional spaces that can be used
-
1 hour ago, Marvel said:
It is entirely on player count. We’re splitting our population between 9 Clone Battalions and 3 VIP Factions. In our current state we already have one battalion locked due to health and we still have multiple battalions struggling. That isn’t even getting into the nitty gritty of the factions either which arguably only one of them performs well.
I don’t disagree with your takes on the civilian faction honestly I’m not a big fan of it however adding a 4th faction will not solve any of the current issues we’re having with keeping each and every battalion and faction healthy. It will only take from them all which is a large reason I don’t open DU back up because everyone will flock towards it completely killing the battalions that are already on the brink of death and harming the larger battalions that will lose people too.
Ultimately the only thing to do if we wanted a hostile faction is to replace the Civilian faction with something fully hostile or give them jobs that are straight up hostile again.
Having a hostile portion of civilian honestly is a decent compromise
-
1
-
-
52 minutes ago, Marvel said:
We absolutely do not need a fourth faction. We can barely support three as it is.
Largely because there is nothing interesting to do. We have severely hampered our ability to create interesting in character interactions just from the nature of the way we have factions set up. The best player driven "events" from the past few years, in terms of RP and general server engagement, were due to the "Neutral" faction not behaving like they should and being directly antagonistic to the GAR. Having a neutral faction with no directly hostile faction makes it so conflict can only run in one direction. Engagement for the GAR is heavily hampered by having no real player driven enemy, and the utility and RP of hunters is gutted by only having one major power to play with. It's not a matter of player count, it's how we use our factions to begin with.
-
9 hours ago, Rohan said:
Most of these can be handled here: https://synergyroleplay.com/forums/forum/13-cw-server-suggestions/
I have suggestions up from almost a year ago that would take two hours max that haven't been approved or denied.
9 hours ago, Rohan said:For bullet point 3, are you essentially looking to make it a DarkRP type faction where they have a job and can do various activities?
Oh 100%. As much as DarkRP as a system sucks you need to have some sort of progression, interactivity, and interaction these roles can actually have outside of pure RP. Pretending to be a
9 hours ago, Rohan said:For bullet point 3, are you essentially looking to make it a DarkRP type faction where they have a job and can do various activities?
For point 4 & 5, assuming they go hand in hand, what would the local government function like in your eyes with the PDF?
And finally for 7, do you think adding another group while we already have 5 playable ones is genuinely a good idea? And if so, why? (Senate, Hunters, Clone, Jedi, Naval)Oh 100%. For the civilian role you need some sort of interaction, progression, etc outside of just pure RP. Pretending to bantha farmer with no tangible or interactable aspect is only fun for so long, the same with smuggling or other criminal activities.
The PDF would act as sort of civilian defense forces not totally loyal to the GAR or the antagonistic faction. Their goal is their immediate short term gain and the prosperity of the village. The local government would very much be the same, depending on the person doing the roleplay. The major difference between the senate and the local government is lifting the restrictions placed by having them be purely lore characters. There is a level of day to day interactivity that you lose with aloof senators. You allow people to tell their own stories. Say there's a two hour shoot out in the village with insurgent or BH forces, that matters far more to the people who have to live with the dead and clean up the bodies than Galactic senators who care more so from a humanitarian removed perspective. There's more room for corruption, back room deals, and it adds an incentive for Clones, Jedi, and Naval to actually behave and use proper RP. Actions suddenly have in RP, and potentially lasting, consequences. These politicians don't have any real incentive to placate the GAR or the Senate, they could just as easily turn to the CIS for the "betterment" of their people or for personal gain. The same is just as true in reverse, depending on how the players behave.
Yes, but with a caveat. It has to both be antagonistic and not closely tied to any specific groups in lore. Something like the "Insurgents of Corellia". Like the CIS of old, having an "on sight" group dedicated to chaos, combat, and furthering their faction's goals on the planet opens huge RP and PVP potential. One of the largest issues we have is that BHs are heavily restricted by their place on the server. They're technically neutral but are the only player driven source of conflict. Essentially all RP is about telling a cooperative story, when there is no clear antagonists to create conflict that story becomes much more boring. Even on the quest side of things there is so much potential to having directly opposing forces. Some of the best and most memorable character driven events were a result of BHs nutting up and being the bad guys. If we're all telling stories together we're severely hampering our ability to do so. Having an opposing force would greatly increase engagement for the GAR and give friendly hunters some actual utility
-
While taking a look at the recent poll for whether or not we should return to Onderon, I was heavily surprised that people did not realize that Anaxes V3, Onderon, and Corellia all suffer from the same core issue. As someone who's been around long enough to have experienced all three, I distinctly remember the waves of disappointment, boredom, and discontentment with our maps as they finally settled in on the player base. Now don't get me wrong, they each have their unique charms and downsides. In essence though, they all suffer from two major design flaws. 1. They are not built for purpose or the direction the server is inching towards, 2. They certainly aren't built around "Nodes".
1. Built for purpose
This server is essentially "Occupation RP Lite". We have civilians, an occupying military force, but that's it. The villages we've had so far have been outright terrible, with Corellia genuinely being the worst for missing the mark so hard. Civilian is constantly in this cycle of life and death because there's nothing to do as a civilian, outside of antagonize the republic. The Republic genuinely has no utility for hunters as it stands, and Hunters make up the majority of civilians. This all starts with the core issue of the village. There are no true defining landmarks or important buildings in the village. If we want people to roleplay as genuine civilians we need to put the structures in place to at least give them the space to do so. A functioning village needs some sort of Governmental building, A bar or gathering place, Shops, a bank even, and places for people to live.
More to this point, the base is too far away from the village. On every iteration of the Map the base has been this distant and antagonistic place, too far to really get RP going. While this is fine, any village going forward needs a small outpost battalions can be stationed at to encourage RP, cooperation, and conflict.
The whole point of that rant is to show that our maps genuinely fail at encouraging any sort of genuine or deeper RP between civilians and clones. We're too deeply stuck between "Clone wars RP" and "Clone wars occupation RP", and it really shows in our map design. The locations on the map are not meant for genuine use, rather they're pit stops for the clones on the way to kill shit.
2. Built around "Nodes"
In the designing of any map for any game "Nodes" are used as the places of genuine activity. These are your places of interest, things you're willing to spend your time traveling to. Our points of interest are genuinely dogwater. Corellia improves on this MASSIVELY. The slaver camp was a fantastic addition to the map because it serves as a semi-fortified neutral point for both clone and criminal RP, and the Temple/Crystal caves are genuinely just fantastic. Still, where it matters the map falls short. I think people would care a lot less about how pretty the map is if there were tons of shit to do in each location for each faction. The Village, Temple, and Base need to all be equally as important, where secondary locations needn't be. In terms of secondary locations, they need to be interesting/fortified enough to make them somewhat of a challenge to attack. This can be a run down and abandoned outpost, an illicit criminal compound, a small fortified camp set up in an area of natural beauty, caves used by smugglers and terrorists, etc. They don't need to be intensive, but for the love of god they need to be interesting. We need to be building the map around our three major points of interest.
3. Direction of the server
This is more a list of general bullet points of things I think would benefit the server
1. Bring back friendly/hostile models for bh
2. Expand the number of civilian jobs and reduce the number of guild jobs
3. Expand the types of civilian jobs and give them systems to support them, (Consumables vender, Gun salesman, Smuggler, Drug maker, etc)
4. Move away from the Galactic senate and lean more heavily into local government
5. Replace Senate Guard with local PDF troops
6. More minigames for in base depending on role. (Fixing comms, engine room, etc)
7. Create a fourth and directly hostile faction. They should be like insurgents, terrorists/bandits and such. Give them a base under village.
-
5/5/5 warcrimes
-
+1. CG is in dire need of change in culture and leadership. Kaiser's proven track record as BCMD of 212th, as both a leader and a chooser of leaders, speaks for itself. I think he will bring the change necessary to revitalize and better balance the RP/Community portion of CG and their role as Rule keepers
-
1
-
-
5/5/5
Thank you for hosting an event for us, we appreciate the effort -
+1 I support having a Welsh Commander Cody
-
1
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, Shady said:
Even tho he was on a suspession from staff he was still a member of staff and he has to follow the rules. The fact that people are defending this action and saying it was a joke have no regard for server rules.
Your misunderstanding of the rules is extremely concerning to me. You did not strip his weapon. Even handcuffed you can hold onto a grip and pull a trigger, but furthermore in that roleplay scenario he had full access to his weapon. No if ands or buts, according to the rules he was well within his rights to shoot you
-
1
-
-
Just now, Shady said:
The Issues is the fact they used the models and started shooting. Once they took there helmet off they were still a clone not a commando droid and they were shooting at clones.
1. None of this applies to Kaiser because he did not has staff powers at the time
2. Non-Lore Character, Non-BCMD, and models not uploaded solely for pixelcat's use are free to be used by the GM team. Commandos do not need to take their helmets off so long as they are using CIS weapons to engage clones. Until a new commando droid event job is created with our current models the issue of the model having a clone head will still exist, which is part of the reason the rules are written the way they are. I highly suggest you expunge this as evidence simply because it does not apply to the person you are attempting to report.-
1
-
-
Who's Online 0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 44 Guests (See full list)
Map and Server direction discussion
in General Discussion
Posted
Civilian needs a lot of TLC. More models, more darkrp type stuff, like we need the ability to actually tangibly be criminals, assassins, smuggles, or guns for hire, and civilian in general needs to be expanded. Less hunters, more actual civilians