Bane

+1 This is just a spartan laser

+1. 241st wanted the droid poppers disseminated amongst other battalions to begin with, in case nobody remembers. I think this is a very reasonable ask so long as you dont oppose other battalions having droid poppers on some of their WLs too

Instead of taking up a WL slot for your battalion what do you think about this being added as an event job?

I think this is an interesting idea, how exactly would you like to see this manifest in game in terms of gameplay changes?

is this a halo 2 reference.....

+1, Make RI cool again

FYI used to be one of the older members of Synergy, but at this point, nobody really takes him seriously anymore. He hangs around acting like his opinion still carries weight, even though the server clearly moved on without him a long time ago. Every time he tries to involve himself in discussions, it just feels like someone clinging to relevance instead of actually contributing anything useful. Most people see him as washed-up and out of touch with how the community works now. He constantly talks like he still has influence, but in reality, nobody is looking to him for decisions or leadership anymore. The server has grown past the era where FYI mattered, and everyone knows it except him. Instead of adapting or improving, he just repeats the same tired attitude that made people stop listening in the first place. At this stage, he’s basically just a background character trying to relive old status that no longer exists. Synergy functions perfectly fine without his input, and that alone says everything that needs to be said.

Thank you Woney

As somewhat light hearted as this post is, I think it's a major misread of the situation for the people responsible for this decision to just try and joke it off. There's a legitimate question that people are posing, how and why was this decision made? Was this ban, and how it was conducted, fair? How does this ban rank to similar cases in terms of punishment? I think these things all need a clear, concise, and well reasoned answer that's taken seriously. It's not that the players can force a change on the decision, but if they don't trust or respect the people responsible for making decisions they're just going to choose to spend their time and money elsewhere.

+1

+1, based. Been advocating for a militarized neutral faction for years to add nuance to civ rp, this just proves that putting all my chips in on Zeros was the correct call

Lol, lmao

+1, though it's shameful behavior that people aren't fighting over CCs