Jump to content

Dragon

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    1,447

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Dragon

  2. Adding the Jet Trooper DC-17 to 327th's JT job

    in Denied

    Posted

    -1. 

    When I made the suggestion we gave up every weapon the trooper had for it except a rocket launcher and the westar (because all arc have the westar, even so i placed restrictionsom when the westar can be used). If you are willing to make similar sacrifices then I think it would be ok, but as it stands just adding it would make the kit stupidity OP. 

  3. Dragon's LOA 8/1-8/4

    in Completed LOA's

    Posted

    By filing an LOA you acknowledge that using the LOA to deliberately avoid performing your staff duties will result in removal from the staff team without notice.

    IMPORTANT: If you are going on an LOA for more than a month please contact a Director first before posting it. Otherwise you may be removed from staff.

    Title your LOA as: [NAME]'s LOA [START DATE-END DATE]

    Name: Dragon

    Staff Rank: Director

    Length of LOA (Please specify date if possible): 8/1-8/4

    Reason: Vacation

    Do you understand that if you go LOA on a named Jedi Character for more than two weeks, go on LOA on any RC character, or go LOA while being clone commander, you will be removed from that position: Yes

    Do you understand that if you are going on LOA for more than two weeks you may lose your leadership position?: Yes

  13. Void

    in Denied

    Posted

    The applicant has voided his app.

    This is your only void in 30 days. Another void will result in a 30-day cool down.

    //moved to denied

    • Friendly 1

  16. Remove Order 66 rule V2

    in Denied

    Posted

    Unfortunately, this has been denied, we have discussed it and felt that if we were to allow it, people would minge the fuck out of it. 

    Banning people for saying Order 66 out of a whim is not what is supposed to happen as well, so if you see it, report it to an HA+ ASAP. It should start off with a simple warning before it gets even close to escalating to something like that.

     

    We have also decided on lowering the ban from 7 days to 3 days since we felt like 7 days was too much for this rule.

     

    A good reason why someone should be banned for this reason is ONLY if it were to be obviously malicious.

    If a staff bans someone referring to that with an unmalicious standpoint, that is a big no-no.

     

    // moved to "Denied"

    "Suggesting the same thing over and over again will not change our minds."-Joah

×
×
  • Create New...