OkamiHybrid

+1 but if they lag the server, get em outta here

The main objection to this is, we don't really follow canon lore, and atleast in legends Plo koon's master was a wookie from what I remember, so there are/ have been wookie jedi, other than that uhhh +1 to the suggestion

+1 rex go nyooooom

I can agree with this, I was debating on including these two jobs in the first place as even before arf didn't have shield, if they keep shield than we'd omit the z6 and arc has well... arc loadout

We've had a suggestion for new shields in pending since ~november. The Z6 was beneficial for us as it allowed us to do much heavier and offensive pushes towards hostiles and thus advance the force or secure an area quickly. also not gonna respond further due to forum mods being spooky(and not wanting to plague the comment section) once again thanks for your critiques/input :)

The issue with utilizing only the shields is the lack of opportunity, the shields are poor in design and work well only when placed down, the main use that would show their specialty would be advancing forward, however due to the shields nature this doesn't work well, they are small and hard to maneuver with. Many of our formations are based around the ideas of having multiple Z6's on hand, however when people have no real incentive to stick with the heavy specialization and they venture to different specializations(Medic, ENG etc). 41st are currently the only "recon" battalion per say, while 104th is, at-least to my knowledge still heavily based with vehicles. If another battalion wishes to regain what they lost in the equalization update, they are able to put up a suggestion. We are just the first battalion so far to do it(to my knowledge). I appreciate your critiques/input.

Voided Took some of the comments into consideration, and thought it over a bit more and I believe its in DU's best interest to pursue the new shields, as the main reasoning for us getting Z6's back was the current shield is just trash, which makes the idea of our battalion, breaching and clear, being able to secure the front lines and lead heavy advances lackluster as the tool we need to fulfill that idea is awful. If any suggestion like this would pass, I see know it would be a general suggestion requesting to revert the standardization update as a whole, which I'm for, though I don't know the implications of getting that suggestion up.

+1 doe I agree with dennis on more like 150-200, let my man wrecker KO b2's

+1 Endor is nice n all, but it do be laggy. We dont have an ETA on the underground map so this would be a neat change of pace

+1 i mainly dont care if rancor has 5 channels, but I wanna +1 because i wanna see rancor do the 1 minute video ron said to do.

+1 boomer skirata

If this was implemented, would shock be given something similar to the handcuff swep some servers use and baton(insta arrests) be handled by staff? While I understand the idea, I think, it seems like something that would only happen via comprise(the handcuff sweps) as no cg is going to agree to having the item and ability to arrest someone revoked without some sort of compromise.That and the handcuff sweps do allow for some more RP in an arrest situation which is one of the reasons I brought them up anyway. Though my apologies if anything sounds weird, not the best at projecting my thoughts in a cohesive manner.

Dennis brings up some good points, the reason why encounters require supervision is so, as Dennis mentioned, people don't hop on a job to kill someone and do it under the guise of one of these "random RP" scenarios. If you're able to present a good way to circumvent this, and some of the other issues this presents I'd definitely +1. As of now, this idea seems to just be encounters that don't need supervision, although you would still need administrators to help with the scenario anyways(health setting, load-outs, getting out of admin room). Currently VIP's can just ask to get supervised if they want to do an encounter, although I don't know how many know of this as it doesn't get stated anywhere obvious. For now, its a -1, if you address some of the grievances I listed with adequate explanation i'd definitely change my vote.

+1 People using 'but performance' is a situation that, I presume, the intel team would test to see if they strain the server. They seem like better vehicles, and the implementation of A.I controlled vehicles would be very helpful for events.

+1