Jump to content

TacocaT

Member
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by TacocaT

  1. 3 minutes ago, GlobalOffender said:

    im also going to state this was not a decision that 91st made we were told to do this but after like 100 hours of work ill be damned if this is removed it will show how little the community cares for peoples time

     

    It's not the work put in that is what people are upset about but more the implementation.  I personally think that if a need is identified to elaborate or expand basic Recon training then it should be done.  I do not think it should be retroactively affecting this many battalions if it is a basic training.  I feel that if people in their respective groups have passed ARC or ARF then the basics, as it has been described, of Recon are a pretty moot point to them.

  2. 8 minutes ago, BigMan/TimmyThicc said:

    Ill -1 because based on my experience with the actual ARQ was pretty pleasant. Its not long at all and it shows you the basics of what Recon is preparing you for both ARC and ARF. The training itself only takes like 30 min once everything is set up (tad bit longer today because of the amount of ppl attending today) and is rather fun imo but everyone is entitled to their own opinion and if ppl didnt like it, just stating that i liked it when i attended

    I kinda didn't want to get involved, but I have an honest question.  So, when I became a Heavy they made sure I understood how to position, how to use the weapon, what not to do. When I became an Engi, they made sure I knew how to RP the work and everything and what my role would be.  If it is basics of Recon, shouldn't it be something that is done at the beginning?  Shouldn't it be the 100 level course of "Here's how to be recon" and not a mandatory 200 level course that affects somewhere around 50% of 7 major battalions?

     

    To clarify: Should this not be the training to become Recon, not something to move through the ranks of recon?

×
×
  • Create New...