TacocaT

I don't know about removal maybe a hiatus? Maybe this is just stress creeping in resulting in things like BB's post? Community management can be frustrating so I agree with @Joah a talk or an executive break.

It's not the work put in that is what people are upset about but more the implementation. I personally think that if a need is identified to elaborate or expand basic Recon training then it should be done. I do not think it should be retroactively affecting this many battalions if it is a basic training. I feel that if people in their respective groups have passed ARC or ARF then the basics, as it has been described, of Recon are a pretty moot point to them.

I kinda didn't want to get involved, but I have an honest question. So, when I became a Heavy they made sure I understood how to position, how to use the weapon, what not to do. When I became an Engi, they made sure I knew how to RP the work and everything and what my role would be. If it is basics of Recon, shouldn't it be something that is done at the beginning? Shouldn't it be the 100 level course of "Here's how to be recon" and not a mandatory 200 level course that affects somewhere around 50% of 7 major battalions? To clarify: Should this not be the training to become Recon, not something to move through the ranks of recon?