Jump to content

Sanchez

Member
  • Posts

    1,154
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Everything posted by Sanchez

  1. Bounty Hunters are allowed to defend themselves. The situations that i've seen is a provocation from some bounty hunters. So yes you are allowed to defend yourself, but just as the rules state your life is your top priority if you can get out of a situation without firing take that route //locked //Moved to Answered
  2. @Sleeper Contact any of the High command they will give you documents, and invite you in the pilot discord I hope this answered you question. If you have any other questions related to this issue please message me on discord Sanchez#7036 //Locked //Moved to Answered
  3. Pretty sure thats a "feature"
  4. //Moved to Pending No this wasn't forgotten. A community vote will be made to ultimately see the overall community reception of changing serious RP //Locked
  5. Sanchez

    Really

    This is Denied not just because of the format. -ERP'd in CHAT -Came on a ALT caught by @ Forseen The VA that your referring to was doing tryouts so I was the one to take you into a sit and ban you. You were literally only banned for a day, but because of your recent alting this will be extended @Saulbac //Locked //Moved to Denied
  6. After speaking with spite, it does seem that the ban was a mistake. Apologies for the inconvenience this ban will be removed from your ban record //Moved to Accepted
  7. Impersonating, bot raiding a discord, lying to battalion to get their TS password, and not even wait a week to make an appeal. This is a Community of second chances even third or fourth, but what you did to try to ruin someone elses second chance (hayley) by impersonating them is despicable. You may appeal at a later date, but for now Appeal Denied | Community Feedback | //Locked //Moved to Denied
  8. This Report is Currently Under Review. The Current staff member in question is being Contacted. Most likely this Ban will be over before the ban can be lifted, however it will be expunged from your ban record if it is a case of false steamID //Locked
  9. After speaking with staff on icefuse, we have decided to Accept your appeal. They confirmed that you have been constantly improving and are one of the better staff members. This appeal will be accepted on good faith and community feedback. You will be on a one strike rule from here on out. Any rule breaking for a 3 month period will result in a perma ban. Appeal Accepted //Moved to Accepted
  10. User has voided suggestion //locked //Moved to Denied
  11. @k0j4k Question did you get permission for rancor bcmd to post this?
  12. I am going to say this about this suggestion. So I've had many and i mean many complaints about server performance and pilots ships being deleted midflight because of tanking server performance. What I think many pilots that did +1 need to realize is that this most likely wont be any better and the likely hood of it happening more is very likely so please keep that in mind. And for the love of God do not come to me complaining about your ship being deleted mid flight because the server is smoking
  13. @Tinovious Dont mind that kojack Ok now for some actual balance changes. To truly make Heavy ordinance useful you're going to have to nerf some classes in rancor. Highly specialized battalions literally applies to almost every battalion. In a perfect world rancor would be an arf battalion with actual specialized weaponry instead of just handing a chain gun and westar to everyone and their mother. HVO will not suddenly be more appealing because of giving them a z-6 . Every battalion has different struggles and strategies but, ultimately it's up to those in the regiment/battalion to pull people into it. With the current state of rancors laughable balance if you can even call it balence is going to suppress things like HVO and I dont think giving them more and stronger weapons is going to fix it. What will end up happening is other rancor members will complain and the scaling for rancors weapons will become even more unbalanced as time goes on -1 Apologies for grammatical errors I am on my phone atm
  14. -1 a couple reasons 1. The regiment literally has no use on the server besides from deployments nor is there a reason to add it. 2. Did you discuss this 104th high does anyone besdies you in the 104th desire this. I entirely agree 104th needs something other then tanks, negotiations, and pilots, but this will not end well as a regiment. 3. Appointing yourself as the lead is ah well weird if the HC of 104th desire you to be the lead that's fine, but it would he up to them and the directors (trad and I) how its implemented and there only one place on the map that's it would be useful. The small little lake outside of the base and by the waterfall. 4. "Description: I do understand that you all might think that Scuba is a useless, but due to my predicament I feel as if doing this and maybe giving me lead, makes me feel less useless than I already am" umm dude if you need to talk I'm open ears but just playing on the server is useful. Scuba is useless but you are not. If you are having trouble with self esteem and finding a use on the server just play not everyone needs a "use". I believe this being added is not just a bad idea but it will hurt your self esteem even more so.
  15. Sanchez

    Random RP

    -1 Encounters only require an admin to supervise. They dont need to set it up only be present. Also has its me, trad, and marvels responsibility to set up system like this when they are suggested. If you could make this suggestion detailed on how you would implement this as im sure you have some idea since you suggested it. Also this was part of the idea with chambers idea with naval
  16. again two times both times Fox applications literally just a miscommunication between directors on who was sending it out with finals around the corner for me, marvel planning on resigning, and me working diligently on bounty hunter docs we made a mistake. With blitz applications we asked if they would like the public sixta did not so we did not feel that releasing both reasons would be far to the other applicant. Also I would like to address something cannon it seems that if we as directors don't do something perfect you seem to hop on the train to try to direct hate towards us. Please stop we make mistakes, but we don't need to be called out when a small one such as this one is made. //locked //Moved to Answered Questions
  17. @Rohan "Unless you messaged me and deleted it or just messaged marvel that is not true. I have no messaged history with you. I can't speak for marvel, but yeah one incident is not indicative of how hard it is to contact us. This specific ban was not on our list of priorities and was unfortunately forgot about. It was discussed extensively in the chat, but other topics were more and are more important. He messaged me one more time after that and I reminded the topic in the chat and from then on it was forgot about. " All of that was talking to him rohan. Why would I quote him otherwise. I told you to read everything not glaze over it.
  18. Im talking about the person I quoted not him read everything I typed out I addressed that.
  19. Unless you messaged me and deleted it or just messaged marvel that is not true. I have no messaged history with you. I can't speak for marvel, but yeah one incident is not indicative of how hard it is to contact us. This specific ban was not on our list of priorities and was unfortunately forgot about. It was discussed extensively in the chat, but other topics were more and are more important. He messaged me one more time after that and I reminded the topic in the chat and from then on it was forgot about. Now for why he was banned The situation he was banned for was for advertisement in the sith discord if im not mistaken I wasn't really apart of the situation nor was I high staff at the time. The stream was him being extremely salty, promoting minging, and the situation got two people removed from staff. Yes, it was completely forgotten about. But the details about this appeal are either purposely skewed to make it seem like the offense is lesser or you just forgot about what actually happened.
  20. RP Name/Steam Name: Steam ID: STEAM_0:0:67685840 Date of Ban: May 31st 2018 Length of Ban: Perm Offense: Mass Ban of odisons Banned By: Joah Why should we unban you/shorten the ban period?: Has shown constant improvement on the server. He was unbanned by zim on the server, but not on the forums. Evidence to support your claims: Has worked his way up in the jedi order to obtain Luminara, and has been a generally good presence on the server.
  21. Keep this report formal. Do not comment for no reason with no feedback, or you will be warned.
  22. //Locked //Moved to "Answered Questions"
  23. In your words "This why you wouldn't make a good perma SA because I was kicked." I completed your request.
  24. I dont think everyday but maybe on a designated time like monday and thursday +1
  25. Sanchez

    Ban Appeal

    I'm going to lock this You can get STEAMID 32 from any form of steamID provided including a steam profile link For some reason I cannot find his past offenses, and cannot unban him. I've spoken to jackson about this and he said it seems to be a glitch. //locked
×
×
  • Create New...