Buzz

If they bought it for him why would they file it? :omegalul:

-1 Doesn't matter if it was intentional or not. You used your parents money and didn't even ask, if I were them I would've filed it as well and probably would've taken your electronics away for awhile. Life is life, deal with it.

Biggest issue, for one, there have been too many things that have been added and failed miserably, if we keep adding more and more trainings then no one will be able to be that "role" they desire. I'll be honest, adding things could be good but it can be bad. It may have been taken differently if there was a server suggestion.

+1 Not needed, if ARC is that hard to pass than something needs changed, no need for pre-reqs for something that widespread, sorry not sorry to those but this is kinda the Covert Ops to SOBDE, pointless/useless. There wasn't even a server suggestion to adding this so don't implement something that is controversial.

-1 Haven't we gone over like this once before? No need to keep replacing battalions that don't need touched. *cough* *cough* If a battalion is doing fine then why fix something that doesn't need fixed? Just my thoughts on this. Hank Voight

+1 to the Name change, every 30 days, -1 to the custom forum ranks, no need for extra work for a tag.... Old Man Voight / C3PO

+1 This would be fun to use imo. Might have to try it out myself.

-1 to Jurassic World: Star Wars nor are we going back to We're Back: A Dinosaur Star Wars Story..... Also LAG FEST!

+1 Helps decipher what we should look like from what we currently look like.

-1 You should know this as a TR, but the ban length could be shortened, but what you did is still kind of questionable.

+1

-1

+1 It is plain logic, hello? Naval runs the ship and they have a MED branch for a reason.... RC 39 Foxtrot LEADER Gregor | Buzz

Yes it would be nice due to nostalgia, but in reality both maps have pros and cons, might as well stick with the one we have until the new map comes out. RC 39 Foxtrot LEADER Gregor | Buzz

-1 You're there to help not make profit.....

-1 It will be too mingey, so hell no. Also, this would be a waste of space.

This is how you talk to people? Really? I expected better from you as an Admin. Maybe refrain from being an ass to people. So please refrain from being livid in a post.

-1 Is this a money grab for CG? No, not happening.

-1 We tried this once, it didn't work, just AOS those who do ____ on deck!

-1 Yes, it adds RP but here comes the kicker. Didn't we just remove battalions so there aren't that many on ship? (Yes I know I was one of them) When adding a new battalion you have to look at how many people would actually be interested, which means more than 4 a day. Because if people see that there is only 1 person that gets on more than the others people will assume the battalion is dead (Only way to call a battalion dead if all of the members are dead or removed...kek) or the battalion has no interest in others.

As staff we are to ensure that the rules are being enforced, not break them. This is not acceptable by any means, it is time to sort this out. RC 88 Foxtrot EOD Buzz | Buzz Thorison

+1

@Doc If I had to choose two models, that definitely replace, would be Stak and Razor, and add ARC if possible. Stak: Assassin Captain (ARF) Razor: Scout Captain and if possible using the Assassin Captain as ARC if possible. Those would be the three things I would want out of the pack. So that would only be replacing two models and adding one job.

@Zim If you feel like there is an abundance of jobs, you can always message me and we can pinpoint which ones should be used, that way we don't add multiple jobs that aren't needed. BCMD Neyo/Buzz Thorison

-1 How about we leave the battalions alone for awhile? I know the 187th is loved but it is time to move on to something better.