Jump to content

Crimson

GM Leadership
  • Posts

    676
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by Crimson

  1. This is an opinion and the research is based on myself and me only. So If I have anything wrong feel free to correct me so that I can adjust my statements.

    First statement, Dennis is an interesting figure. He has a good work ethic while also always shifting his PR. So I understand the divide in see him go for another BCMD position. However lets stick to the facts for a second. His time as Doom made DU active and made it one of the desired battalions at the time. Now that could be up to him or those he brought to influence its popularity. Now my only issue with the DU from his leadership style is that it created a need for a Doom or XO to be a large figure in the battalion. That means it will always need a strong leader and someone who is approachable to be successful. If you think I am wrong look at the activity of the Battalion from the many Dooms since Dennis. I personally think that's not a way a battalion should be setup but again not sure if its 100% on you.

    Rancor, The time I was palpy for the most part most members of Rancor support Dennis. In fact when I was asked about the ARC wipe ,which for the record I approved of as well as the Directors at the time, every member of Rancor I asked at the time said it was needed or they supported it. So it amazed me to see every member of the Battalion besides his inner circle go and say the ARC wipe was dumb after the Commander Report was posted. On that note, addressing the Commander Report. As I have stated before, that commander report was address and with the current TS rules at the time he did not break any rules. Now I personally do not think you should say anything like to anyone. But it is strange to see so much support for that report coming from certain people that posted or stated similar statement or of the same edgy humor. Especially while complaining about the subject while having a pfp of the same humor. Interesting.

    Lastly the 21st Wipe. Dennis had nothing to do with it. It was a Marshal Commander+ vote. Simple as that. When we were considering it, we needed to select some Officer candidates from inside the battalion and out. The candidates accepted knowing they would give up higher ranks to benefit another battalion. You may disagree with how Dennis's personality or edgy humor however he does have a good track record of either fixing a battalion or recognizing good leaders and instating them so that they can help him. And from what I can understand about the wipe and the aftermath, it was decently a success. Now im not going to say it was the end all of solutions. However with the atmosphere at the time, we made a choice and stuck to it. 

    Now for my vote, @Dennis My question for you is that assuming you get the position or get to interview, What are your plans for instating leadership and your Command structure. So say your XO pick if you have one or how you are going to evaluate you choices? After that what are you plans for after your term? Are you going for one term or staying till you deem the 21st can run after you without reverting?

    P.S. I am posting this while not being at my house so I may be late to a response. 

    • Agree 1
  2. Name: Crimson

    Staff Rank: HA

    SteamID:
    STEAM_0:0:61827702

    Length of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): 02/19/2021 - 02/22/2021

    Reason: Typing this early incase I forget, I will be heading out of town to chill with some old friends and do some bang bang pew pew shit. Side note, Damn hella lot of HAs going on LOA.

    Do you understand that if you go LOA/ROA on a named Jedi Character for more than two weeks, go on LOA/ROA on any RC character, or go LOA/ROA while being clone commander, you will be removed from that position: yes

    Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your leadership position?: yes

  3. Name: Crimson

    Who helped (If applicable): Snadvich, Bacta, Shumbus, Shockpoint

    Event Name: Payday Boys!

    Summary: The Bounty Hunters robbed a bank to gather some funds for further contracts for future events.

    KrMCdFv.png

    • Winner 1
  4. 11 minutes ago, justuscloud5 said:

    Your constant lying, minging, breaking your own rules, and shifting of blame are apparent in the situation which arose with John. Where while John was flying a LAAT you rdmd him and when you were AOSd you rushed to CG to have the AOS voided, again you told 2 different stories and threatened me when I asked for your side of the story. You told shock you were hosting an encounter but you were on the ridge as BCMD Gree with an unchanged name in the TS channel while you were shooting at John. You then told Xeight you were trying to take a cinematic picture and that John got in the way. So you dodged an arrest and any staff issues by shifting blame and lying about the event. I had to get cronis involved in the situation to sort it out as you basically threatened me when I tried to get your side of the story. As well as with the lying you told 2 separate parties why I wasn't being promoted, one being that I personally asked to not be promoted and the other is you blackballed me and rank locked me behind everyone's back which is true but you didn't tell anyone that one, I was told after it happened that you had an issue with my attitude and you said I was fine and hadn't done anything wrong and when you were asked if I were rank locked you said no. I was told that in fact you dis rank lock me and the person who suggested it was told by you that you would tell me the reasons why but you never did, and instead went into a defensive ball and made accusations towards me.

    Out of curiosity and to gather my thoughts, Can you provide more context the AOS and can I get another POV from @Wren or John or any CG involved? Just trying to see bothsides. 

    Secondly, Did you verify your situation about be promoted or the false pretense of you being ranked locked, Again just trying to gather context. it just seems like you asked miss informed people but why I am asking.

    • Agree 4
    • Winner 1
  5. 11 minutes ago, Joseph said:

    I mean, Is it possible that this is a remarkable situation, and not the same as others?

    I'm going off the context provide and the rules based on a ban from team speak. If there is something I missed then feel free to inform me. However as I do not know who you are thats what I am going off of.

  6. I have been actually thinking about this for a while now so I can take in information and gather my thoughts.

    My issues do not stem from you or how you run your squad and for the most part I think I have voiced my opinion to you but I would like to gather more thoughts. So lets begin. First issue, The ability to have an influence on the server. What I mean by that is that Null has been mostly isolated to the server besides those who are former SOBDE or the battalions that they are outreached for.  Again not a major issues or anything wrong with that but my issue is that any time I speak to a general member of the community, Null is never known in terms of how known that member is or who they are. With that being said for a position that I would consider sought after, That is worrying to me.

    Second issue, The portrayal of Null. Personally, I feel like the current members of Null do not act or try to be their character. The benefit of being a Lore Character is that you have an entire page or book dedicated to your characters personality, goals, and mindset. That should be easy to get into as there are examples. Again, nothing is wrong with putting your own spin on it however when you act completely opposite to who that character is, whats the point besides using the the benefits of SOBDE. {Typing this makes me thinks that's what they want.} 

    Third issue. Irony is funny. In the past month or so, I have seen certain members of SOBDE slowly become only on to fill that spot for the minimal requirement or for tryouts. Not to sound like a boomer SOBDE member, But I have removed members of my squad for meeting the minimal requirement if the rest of the squad can clearly do more then that and so can that person but he chooses not too. The end of the day, that's why its called the minimal. Again, I can not see the sign ins so I can not point out anyone to be 100% like this but from a purely outside prospective that is what most of us noticed.

    We have already spoken about this and I know you are not going to change your views. I respect that. However this is my opinion and I am going to stand by them. I am going to be -1ing this.

    • Agree 3
    • Winner 1
    • Informative 4
    • Friendly 1
×
×
  • Create New...