Feds Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 Name: Feds? Suggestion: Change the commenting on your application rule, a lot of people don’t know the rule and people take advantage of this rule to get people who they don’t like application removed. It doesn’t have any effect on a persons integrity. Secondary Option: Limit the 30 day intill reapplication if a user breaks this rule to 15 days or less, 30 days is excessive for something this small. Implementation: Remove the rule
Posted December 30, 2018 Name: Feds? Suggestion: Change the commenting on your application rule, a lot of people don’t know the rule and people take advantage of this rule to get people who they don’t like application removed. It doesn’t have any effect on a persons integrity. Secondary Option: Limit the 30 day intill reapplication if a user breaks this rule to 15 days or less, 30 days is excessive for something this small. Implementation: Remove the rule
Alexz Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 Its already been changed partially for CMD apps so I think this wouldn’t pass but +1
Posted December 30, 2018 Its already been changed partially for CMD apps so I think this wouldn’t pass but +1
Bbstine Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 People not knowing the rule need to read the template rules when they grab the template. Nobody abuses it, be smart and actually read before posting. 1
Posted December 30, 2018 People not knowing the rule need to read the template rules when they grab the template. Nobody abuses it, be smart and actually read before posting. 1
Feds Posted December 30, 2018 Author Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Brandon said: People not knowing the rule need to read the template rules when they grab the template. Nobody abuses it, be smart and actually read before posting. I can show proof, it also allows people to bring up false information but the applicant can’t rebuttle because of the rule. Edited December 30, 2018 by Feds
Author Posted December 30, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Brandon said: People not knowing the rule need to read the template rules when they grab the template. Nobody abuses it, be smart and actually read before posting. I can show proof, it also allows people to bring up false information but the applicant can’t rebuttle because of the rule. Edited December 30, 2018 by Feds
Scarecrow Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 -1 if someone can respond to what they say can sometimes causes more problems if some might get a particular bit of criticism that they might not like and take it the wrong way then it could start a flame war. or someone who might not like the applicant could spur them into making a fool of them self. Not that I would do it but I understand that if someone is hot headed they could fall into that trap
Posted December 30, 2018 -1 if someone can respond to what they say can sometimes causes more problems if some might get a particular bit of criticism that they might not like and take it the wrong way then it could start a flame war. or someone who might not like the applicant could spur them into making a fool of them self. Not that I would do it but I understand that if someone is hot headed they could fall into that trap
Buzz Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 -1 It literally states in the TEMPLATE, failure to read the whole thing is the applicant's fault. Sorry not sorry, Buzz. 1 Choose your place, hell or high water, there is no in between.
Posted December 30, 2018 -1 It literally states in the TEMPLATE, failure to read the whole thing is the applicant's fault. Sorry not sorry, Buzz. 1 Choose your place, hell or high water, there is no in between.
Retired Founder Ron Posted December 30, 2018 Retired Founder Posted December 30, 2018 This isn’t really a forum suggestion, and it only affects CWRP atm @Carter
Retired Founder Posted December 30, 2018 This isn’t really a forum suggestion, and it only affects CWRP atm @Carter
Chambers Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 19 minutes ago, Ron said: This isn’t really a forum suggestion, and it only affects CWRP atm @Carter Eh, just leave it here it's about the forums.
Posted December 30, 2018 19 minutes ago, Ron said: This isn’t really a forum suggestion, and it only affects CWRP atm @Carter Eh, just leave it here it's about the forums.
Bbstine Posted December 30, 2018 Posted December 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Carter said: Eh, just leave it here it's about the forums. It's a Forum Suggestion that is based off of Director decisions on your formats. So, if you want to get together with @Andrews53 @Sinister as well and decide a universal staff template and rules that'd be great. 1
Posted December 30, 2018 1 hour ago, Carter said: Eh, just leave it here it's about the forums. It's a Forum Suggestion that is based off of Director decisions on your formats. So, if you want to get together with @Andrews53 @Sinister as well and decide a universal staff template and rules that'd be great. 1
Firat/Abi Posted January 2, 2019 Posted January 2, 2019 Im like, if you read the damn template then you should know but anyway +1 if it can keep "idots" away
Posted January 2, 2019 Im like, if you read the damn template then you should know but anyway +1 if it can keep "idots" away
Recommended Posts