.png.84e10d936754687396e8356d95c8caf0.png)
-
Posts
1,657 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Piff
-
-
I agree we should know ban reasons if requested.
-
1
-
1
-
-
59 minutes ago, Bacta said:
The thought process of this was actaully pretty simple
1st: All the muni were being blown up in less then 2-3 minutes within being spawned, I didn't wanna have a event where I kept respawning and spawning in Munis and ship just for it to be instantly cleared which Is why i told my EJ make a super impossible ship to try to fix this issue presented in the event.
i: Have a lore reason why we can keep spawning dropods/droids without having to awkwardly keep going in and out
ii: Give an extremely difficult challenge to the player base they can pick off THROUGHOUT the event, if they die invading the north base they can help pick off this super duper impossible task either by the ridges on the side of the mountain or such.
2nd: None of the objectives focused on clearing the ships (at the super end we did juts to clear up everything) , we wanted that to be a side objective, It as a bit sad that you focused on that impossible task for the entire event while other people had stuff to do
3rd: I was confused why you didn't ask for help, Im not gonna make objectives modular to just 2 2ndAC i would rather just give an obstacle and its up to you to either tackle it or ignore it, you guys were by yourself in the base shooting at a LAAT of just 2 people
I respect and appreciate the criticism as always tho
I ain't even gonna cap, i be asking for boarding training and get ignored so i wonder why these event jobs might need boarding training, Gotta attack the problem at the root
1 hour ago, KaiserNeiner said:1/4/4
Event was structured really well for an impromptu deployment. Good work hosting.
I did not enjoy this event. Doesn't mean it wasn't ran well. If your EJ's need boarding training to understand how the boarding RP for the server works, we would be happy to help. 2 2ndAC troopers were designated to clear this.
-
1
-
2
-
-
+1 Bana is good guy and good choice for BCMD
-
3/5/5
Infiltrating the base was too easy -
5/5/5 rick was a real slow one
-
5/5/5 I do the nuke
-
Name: Piff
Staff Rank: Admin
Are you VIP?: Yes
Date: 10/27/23
Reason for leaving: Bored of being staff rather just play as a wee lil clone
Farewells: Aint leaving yet
-
On 10/19/2023 at 11:31 PM, Cox said:
-1
1 hour ago, Edgar said:-1
On 10/19/2023 at 1:20 AM, Arroyo said:-1
Its best to keep the sub unit as is and find a way to make it fun for people. If you also want to add a job you have to remove another job since the battalion already has 20.
On 10/18/2023 at 9:38 PM, Mystic said:Dire Squad can't consistently fill their lore characters let alone 6 extra jobs.
-1. Remove them.-1
-
-
I'll become the next founder and invest all of the servers income into crypto so then we can reinvest our gains into the server, ill step up
-
Name: Piff
Staff Rank: Admin
Length of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): 5 Days
Reason: Military Shit pew pew
Do you understand that if you go on LOA/ROA while holding a leadership position, a named character position, or a position with limited slots you may lose your position? Yes
Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your staff/leadership position?: Yes
-
+1 Gud cool guy and good app
-
Guac captured by Avacado ahahaa 5/5/5
-
5/5/5 Pit
-
+1 Bacta said if i didnt +1 he would star a war with Hamaas leading the charge, he started it anyways
-
+1 Give skin plz
-
1
-
-
+1 man can spawn his own kitchen one day
-
-1 I don't see where the reason is in taking an LOA while having a command app up, like it makes no sense to me as to why out of all times you would have an LOA Now, i understand IRL shit, but if you knew ahead of time i don't see why you would put your app up now when there will be questions and concerns that i think people would like communicated in TS not only in the forums, i believe you are unprepared to become a BCMD and should either give it time to seek guidance from others who have held a command position be it a XO/CMD running the battalion or another past BCMD who has a good reputation of being able to run a battalion.
As far as your plans go, if you want officers to host more trainings and such, you are going to be taking away from the NCOs because as it is, 104th has a influx of officers compared to NCOs, when it comes to comparing that to other battalions, and your plan as a whole for officers of wanting them to lead the NCOs is quite literally the job of the officers, so you're just reiterating what their job is to us with no real original, new or interesting plans for them that would make me think anything is changing in regards to the officers, so there is no real base to your plan for officers since basically the entirety of what you want from them should already be a known standard for all officers, if your officers aren't doing what is expected of them, then that is a different story that is beyond me and up to you and the rest of the officers to figure out. As a whole though these plans are just lackluster and vague af and i don't believe you have any real plans to bring in regards to officer core.
In regards to NCOs now, You don't need requirements, you're saying that people are getting SGT and going through NCO ranks too fast, i have quite literally the easiest solution for you, stop promoting people so fast, if anything with requirements you will most definitely put a lot of NCOs in a position that they feel like they have to be promoted when they complete the requirements, in my opinion, set a universal requirement for all ranks, just because someone is a higher rank doesn't mean that they should do more, i believe that all ranks can do just as much as the rank below and above them, and that requirements when you make them increase per rank, it for starters takes the motivation away cause it starts to make playing feel like a job, and also, not only are you forcing someone to do more at a higher rank, but most of the things being put on them is also stuff that lower NCOs need to do and causes issues within the battalion with things such as event leads, patrols, trainings, etc. To add onto solving a influx of NCOs, set your TIG requirements so it already sets a time period that one has to wait to even be considered for promotion, that for one creates more loyal troopers who actually will work consistently and be active, and of course it'll show who will just wait till they hit that TIG requirement and then hope for promotion instead of doing things between that period of being promoted to the next rank and then waiting for their TIG requirement to come by. But to generalize everything again, same as your plans for the officer core, i believe these plans have been rushed simply to add onto your app.
As far as enlisted, i can't say i disagree with the plans, but quite literally i can dumb down all three of your plans for the rank structure into just making requirements for all of them quite literally in its most simple form that's all it is, which to me is not that impressive of a plan in regards to rank structure. Also wolfpack plan dumbed down is just requirements on paper once again.
Also me personally, i think Dire squad is useless if im being completely honest, its just oversaturating the battalion with a subunit that no one wants, put work in what people actually want, not what people don't.
And now that imat the end of the app, you're just basically trying to reinforce standards that should be in place already or just making requirements or lowering requirements, and to me quite simply, i just think, like i said no real thought went into these plans so with that being said i reinforce my -1 even more since i hold 104th near and dear to my heart and would like to see it succeed and not fail, regardless good luck with this and future endeavors
-
1
-
3
-
1
-
-
+1 Anyone can do anything
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, cpt.atomic said:
-1 hell no shit was always rigged when it wasn’t pure pvp
Troll post moment
+1 i think BVB is a good way to let that steam out personally that we all have against each other, as well, it lets the sweaty pvpers come back simply for BVB just to leave again, i think we will all enjoy calling up all the ex SOBDE and Rancor to come argue in a post about cutting down numbers to play competitivelyBVB fun bring back plz
-
Funny
-
+1 Homie sucks at ready or not
-
2
-
-
+1 Nissan is the right man for this and has been hugging and treating the 501st like his own children
-
1
-
-
Name: Piff
Staff Rank: SA
Length of LOA/ROA (Please specify date if possible): LOA (09/09 - 09/17)
Reason: Im in the process of getting a new job right now and next week i have to report to my Military unit for 5 days so i won't be able to do anything those days
Do you understand that if you go on LOA/ROA while holding a leadership position, a named character position, or a position with limited slots you may lose your position? Yes
Do you understand that if you are going on LOA/ROA for more than two weeks you may lose your staff/leadership position?: Yes
-
1
-
-
Who's Online 2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 42 Guests (See full list)
Reenacting historical events
in General Discussion
Posted · Edited by Piff
I have a concern here, when i try to reenact a historical event like a attack on US Soil i get punished, but when kaiser does it its educational thats crazy, i think we should be treated the same way shame.
So when i do 9/11 to remember the lost i get in trouble, but when someone else does it they dont tiss tiss