-
Posts
1,176 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Alexz
-
-
+1 very active staff and helpful when people need him.
-
+1 chill dude in 187th and usually had no issues that I have ever been aware of
-
1
-
-
-1 I do not think this is needed considering how many changes go through you guys and you guys are still never content with it. This is not something needed right now.
-
+1 overall good experiences from the past 2 years I have known him. Did and planned a great event yesterday too.
-
9/10 well planned out and great execution
-
From my few years of experience in SWRP going back to Hammerfall Networks, I always was the least active when my battalion had no one on. I don’t want to be RPing by myself. Personally I want less battalions because it is better for the player experience when you more opportunity to rp with others and not have to afk because you got no one to talk to.
-
+1 but make it so they can only rp in the village and a small perimeter around it. Keep them isolated to that area.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Trixx said:
Interesting, and okay but now my question to you is who do we put in charge of the combined battalions? Each BCMD has been elected into that position because that person worked hard for their battalion. If you ask me I would not feel at all comfortable having another BCMD just railroad me and take over all the systems I have spent over a year creating for DU and smoothing out.
Probably would work under the same system that GM did with SO when they became 21st
-
-
-1 seems really unneeded and would just be a waste of time and resources if what people saying are saying about senators activity is true. IMO senators aren’t that needed that much and only had some purpose when we had BBStine leading the Senate Commandos. SC were a joke but at least they gave senators something.
-
Just now, Alexz said:
LETS REMOVE SOME FUCKING BATTALIONS!!!
This is a meme
-
1
-
-
LETS REMOVE SOME FUCKING BATTALIONS!!!
-
What if someone makes a server suggestion that would make a commission of non-bias staff and high command people to decide what they see as a core issue and what they recommend as a possible solution. This could include looking into battalions and figuring out what is needed and what isn’t. They could report not removing any battalions and propose something else. After they report their findings to high staff and then the community, we could use their suggestions to make a full server suggestion based on their input. They could have as strict or broad authority as they are allowed by high staff . I think a group of people looking into the issue may help instead of person making a suggestion or decision. I don’t know just came to the top of my head and I’m only spitballing ideas out. Feel free to provide feedback on this all you want, it was only an idea.
-
3
-
-
20 minutes ago, Foxey said:
Yeah, let's keep this from turning into a "well my battalion is more active than yours!"
If there's ever a removal of battalions, the unbiased standard of lore-accuracy and usefulness in adherence to lore is probably the best way. DU is reliable because of what they have become as a battalion, but that doesn't protect them from the standard above. We see them fight alongside 501st in the series, so. DU surviving as a 501st subunit would be cool. It balances out the Attack Battalions with both 212th and 501st having two subunits. (212th with 2ndAC and Parjai or Foxtrot)I fully agree lore should play a part since no one would ever budge on their battalion being effected. Battalions with more lore should stay.
-
10 hours ago, Trixx said:
Open the flood gates of dumbs.
For the record I do not condone the actions taken here.
I think people can have a reasonable discussion on this topic without getting all pissed at each other. The general consensus is that people on the server want less, it all just comes down to who should be removed and why.
-
Lol Denis are you in DU? Also everyone who says which battalions should stay includes the battalion you are in. It is okay for other battalions to leave just not mine because mine has a purpose unmatched and unique to the server ecosystem. Older people know I have been a leading advocate for less battalions on the server and I think we have too many already but honestly don’t argue for less battalions but then shield your own from that list. IMO it should come down to 2 from each group. 2 attack, 2 Spec, 2 recon, 2 SOBDE. Maybe one extra attack just because that was the bulk of the army but I definitely think you can shave off a good few. Regardless people are gonna be upset there battalion is gone but overall removal fixes battalions of 4 or 5 active members from not having the chance of being deployed because they don’t have the numbers. Less battalion helps gamemasters because you don’t have to provide for all the battalions during events. I think it would be hard to decide who goes but cutting back on battalions is extremely possible.
-
23 hours ago, justuscloud5 said:
Seizures and aneurysms come randomly sometime my dad whom was a corrections officer had a guy who had one and had no history of drugs or alcohol had a seizure and died in the jail
Called it.- Juice WRLD: Rapper 'swallowed Percocet to hide them from cops' during baggage search. Seizure reportedly caused by this.
-
Probably died from an OD or some weird drug mix.
-
-1 you shouldn’t get special treatment because you are a CT.
-
-
+1 I think 91st could find it helpful to get this.
-
1
-
-
+1 nice guy and fun to work with the 187th in my limited time in here.
-
-1 just came back so I don’t think he’s ready yet
-
-1 has been denied 3 times before and could cause a headache with potential lag.
-
Who's Online 18 Members, 0 Anonymous, 49 Guests (See full list)
[Accepted] Aaron's Community Ban Appeal
in Accepted
Posted
+1 tbh Zim shouldn’t have done that for someone just speaking their mind. Unban the man for the holidays.