Scribbles

What are the offences for? can you list them if need be?

Is that what we're doing now? Keeping people away because that have mental disabilities? Fuck me man. Even if he didn't, people can change with time.

Its been about half a year. Maybe Longer. holding onto things from the past wont get anyone anywhere. Lets say for example someone did someting really bad, that caused alot of problems socially and warranted a perma ban. A year passes by, do you want the person to be held responsible for something they did for a year ago? Or would you want to give them a chance to come back, even though there is a slim chance they have not changed socially. If it happens again then follow up with a no-appeal ban, we all know what @Mike Did and post on the forums, hell the guy should still be perma'd for past offences (No shade thrown). but yknow, he's back, he hangs out. He doesnt post flak cannons anymore. All im saying is a chance should be given, but a leash should be kept.

I mean, getting another rank on another server doesnt nessicarily matter. However +1 its been far too long lmao

unsure honestly, i wasn't around at the moment for when it got yeet'ed

Name: Scribbles Suggestion: Bring Back Tantrum Rantums Why should we implement this?: I feel an extra addition next to Offtopic/In off Topic would help as some people just want to vent some frustration or complain about arbitrary thing. How will this improve the Forums?: Well as far as i'm concerned when i saw this was removed, a lot of people were confused and upset why they were removed, and i believe a place to vent frustrations would be a helpful area. NOT To be confused with direct callouts/Complaining about stuff being worked on, IIRC: Calling someone out and stuff that meant harm towards an individual was removed. Extra: I never knew why Tantrum Rantrums were removed, if someones knows can you comment why? I'd Also like to hear your thoughts on adding it back. (Idunno if this is gonna get Vito Denied but its always worth a shot)

On a non-civi populated world. On a Republic enforced military base. Not to mention the civi having to go through a blockade. Not this one chief.

>Staff abuses and indirectly helps a guy get banned >-1's anyway Loljk anways i havent posted my official vote on this. +1

This is the 3rd weapon change for the Heavy, and 4th model change for the heavy job in specific. It first started out with the heavy looking like captain fucking america put on a clone outfit.

Man out of the time ive been on this server, Y'all fucking rancor want so many model changes. Got Damn. Also The Rancor heavy Ordnance in the past had the Z6 but it got removed for the Minigun, and then every ARC got the minigun, so its just one bgi roudnabout circle now. I feel this is a bit arbitrary for this post as everyone just says this when they want a new weapon/change to their job, when we all genuinely know they just want it for gameplay purposes, because i know for a fact that someone in some lead will just want to change their overseen "Subunit" in the future for the sake of "I want strong or big weapon" and then write a whole paragraph on how it pertains to RP. I know this may seem a little toxic or deemed rude, but this seems more of an internalized small group thing rather than whole server, since the majority of the server are EOD trained (some just dont bother to do it). And ENG Jobs usually walk into the ENG with their bigdick ENG energy anyway when stuff that needs that specialization happen, and when they dont show up, someone with a basic ENG training comes and either does it, or its left un-attended. Not saying im against this, but i feel that there's alot of extra stuff that i feel theres alot of stuff just added for the sake of better reasoning, which is the point of server suggestion i guess. ps. You forgot to add the weapon change/add part of the Server suggestion to your post. +1

Hm. +1

+1

You advertised it throughout the entire sith discord. Also you don't need to apologize to me, i was never upset at you.

Okay first off. Im on LOA, Rude :C Second off, did you get Palpy's Okay hfor this, if not rip you. But overall +1 since Im pretty sure null would be eyeing the fuck outta this senator like a cake because of their specific mindsets with Kaminoans lmao

I hope all of you realise its already been decided 2 weeks on Anaxes, 1 week on a ship. But we gotta find a viable ship map :V

-1

This was denied in the past. Too buggy/And a few map issues. But +1 if this can get past

-1b

Name of the staff member you're asking: @Joah Question: Any venator idea's that may present something new? And would maybe doing a community poll on a popularity vote (I.e maybe people suggesting a new map would open up, i.e putting a steam workshop link of a venator through a doc and higher ups review it) Further attachments: N/A Concerns: I know you get asked about it alot, but what was the specific reason we can't use SLG again?

Hm. This is a debatable suggestion as the original problem with the addon was it that it made everything way too dark, and people dropped frames when it rained. However i really enjoyed it cause you could actually feel like it was dyanmic Also wheres the workshop addon??? +1

That was removed on behalf of an old Neyo for.....i think Lightning squad stuff, that or your jet trooper. One of those. I can't remember.

2 things. 1. Get the model string, not the actual link.... 2. -1, realllly dont think 91st need a heavy

Uhhh, do we even use ULX? I dont think we do.

121 MB For six props??? LMAOOOOO -1 That size makes my butthole clench. we have one, we cant use it normally because the prop whitelisting system is fucked apparently.

Pretty sure these were supposed to be added to the jobs but it never got done