BRUHfrtho

Well It's good that we are on the same page, no hard feelings

I agree, this was too extreme.

The entire thing was just an inappropriate joke taken too far. You went along with this inappropriate joke.

Then why respond in the first place if you had no intent to pursue conversation. Essentially you are admitting to baiting me into the ban by pursuing convo.

It is related to the topic. he called me a simp in the video, though his audio is vague as i aforementioned.

Your argument is valid, however mine stands as well. Why didn't he stop I said jokingly i donated her $500 and he called me a simp about it.

You said Do you watch anime and i replied yes, then we talked about Projekt Melody as in the video, you went further on to call me a simp, however your audio was lowered for an odd reason. You actively pursued conversation.

I told you to disregard my comment which is technically it's equivalent.

Name: BRUH / 501st PVT Disabled Steam ID: 76561198068710919 Ban Reason: "Illicit Act" Date of Ban: 4/27/2020 Length of Ban: Permanent Staff Member(s) Involved: Enzyme Reason(s) why we should accept your appeal: I'd like to begin that this is ENTIRELY my fault. I was in the 501st TS3 chat and talking to someone else who i assumed was my age (14) and could take a joke. I made a reference to a pornhub video by Projekt Melody as a joke and sent another reference to him via dm. I did not send any links. I wanted him to take it as a light hearted joke and nothing more.However this was not the case. I take full responsibilities for my actions and am fine with what ever outcome is decided of this appeal. Evidence to support your claims: I do not have any evidence. However the admin who banned me stated this person did not consent to conversation yet they pursued it. Don't Believe me? Here's the video: During the end area of the video his audio lowers but he still is audible. listen closely. https://youtu.be/0yF_INqxiXM I figured it was ok for me to send the message as the player was pursuing conversation. If they didn't consent they could've told me to stop or mute me / block etc. None the less, they didn't. As you can see in broad daylight, I tell him to disregard the message i said before as i was talking to myself and figured my mice was muted. He pursued conversation after I TOLD HIM to disregard what i said, which is the equivalent of telling him to ignore the comment. I assumed that this was his consent. As i said if he didn't want to speak about the topic he could've muted me or told me to stop. As he is a high ranking officer he has intelligence and the capability of muting me via TS3