[SR] Monnk [A]

Overall I do not believe that adding them as an entirely new thing would work (With their own models etc), the reason for this is that they would ultimately outgrow their usage and finding people to fill up the numbers would be rather difficult, now if they became a subunit of a battalion then I could understand however the models would have to be completely redone to fit the colour scheme of said battalion. For now, I am going to -1 this suggestion.

Now I am going to have to remain a -1, IF every Battalion got together and said “yeah we all want PLT jobs” then I would support this but considering it would only include 501st in this major change it would affect and mess up to much and cause a headache for everyone just so people in the 501st could have a special job. TLDR: Get every Battalion to make a “bring back pilot” suggestion and I’ll +1 this as that’s easier to sort out.

Unfortunately I am going to -1 altering pilot jobs within the 501st, the main reason being that it’s just going to cause so much shit for flying priority because PLT non class troopers will have even less of a chance of Piloting and it shifting to pretty much purely 2 Battalions, now if you want to bring a Pilot job in then you may as well give one to every Battalion to stop it fucking up flight priority ect.

Overall it was a very, very immature thing for Orlando to do and GM should know better then to stop CG doing their job [Unless no CG are present and GM are the closest ones there], this doesn't warrent a report in my opinion however I think Orlando should be spoken to in some manner about this incident and told to reflect on his actions leading to an apology to Holo. Overall I am going to remain NEUTRAL as this doesn't really warrent a report but at the same time Orlando should apologise and be spoken to about his actions.

I am reading a few comments stating that they are staying quite when they have been Team Killed why do you need to call them out in Debrief? Why not go to the Battalions CO who was on at the time and make them aware of it most battalions have a way of dealing with all that. It will ultimately add more onto CG in that you then have to define what is considered to be over the top and what isn't so that CG have a clear guidline of what is allowed and what isn't and overall I just think that it is giving people a safety net to just blanket over anything they say in Debrief. This isn't about people "Hurting people's feelings" It is about if this does go through A] Why aren't people already going through the apropriate means of communication that a Battalion sets up to report something about an individual that requires them to call one person out in Debrief and B] What guidlines are going to be set up to stop someone going over the top and will help CG out in defining whether someone should be arrested or not

I can see where everyone is coming from when it comes to things like this as you can almost always branch it into "They should not take the game seriously" but ultimately if you have someone to complain about most Battalions have a set way of reporting those in their Battalions and so that option should always be sought out first rather then just calling them out publicly for something that could simply be solved privately due to this I am going to -1 this.

No matter the reasoning behind your intoxication that should not be used an excuse, if you find yourself in the position of you going to be drunk typically I would advise you to just not go on your PC to avoid this outright. Overall -1 racism is not okay in any way shape or form and you have to take the full responsibility of your actions be it drunk or not

@Reaver Thank you for clarifying that I will edit the prior message.

For everyone wondering about what he did in terms of Documentation changing in the incident that is being appealed he did the following: Moved someone up to BCMD deleting the current person as BCMD and a CMD who both came back recently These are the things that I saw that were wrong with the Documents though so I am going of what I saw myself not what other people saw. Overall: I believe that the ban should be shortened to a week ban but not unbanned completely out, what you did was wrong and there were otherways of going about with the frustration and anger that you were feeling at the time. +1 to the ban being reduced to a week ban as this is still something that was easily fixed, however at the same time I believe that the Appeal application could of been better worded.

In all fairness I do not see the need or requirement myself to make this change, yes I can see where your argument on that "We don't follow Lore ranks" comes from however at the same time that doesn't mean we jump off the deep end with it, due to this I am going to have to -1 this.

For this I am going to have to -1 this idea and the reasons are as such: The model you have linked is to the Atmospheric Assault Lander which held nearly half the amount of troops alongside they were not designed [In canon and legends] until the time of the First Order. We already have a troop transport and yes it may lower FPS however the model you are suggesting carries less meaning it takes longer to deploy people or we deploy more which then ultimately causes the lag and FPS drops to occur. I would rather have one LAAT that can take 35 [Say] then 2 of the Atmospheric Assualt landers as this will mostly cause the same lag and FPS issues. The server requires more Civilian and CIS ships/models more then anything else in effect not more Republic ships, now yes you could say that this might add more roleplay to the server but not enough to warrant it to be picked over the LAAT especially given that the LAAT can take more people and is more recognised by the people joining the server.