Stak

not everyone is dadd

that was a quote dude this quotation system seems to have some issues.

@Freck originally dadd wanted to see how long it would take to get people mad enough to divulge into logical fallacies by bringing up things that have happened or are currently happening in the server. MY goal was to see if anyone would admit to there being problems with the server (which joah did, but while attacking via ad hominem). Since ad hominem attacks were being thrown around i decided to explain to people that those types of logical fallacies arent helpful even in shit posts. And here we are. Ad hominem

I was worried that someone didn't understand what it meant so i posted the definition. Ad hominem attacks don't help anything and usually tend to harm your point. ^ due to this comment. Stop being a petty pile of shit and move on with your miserable life. AD HOMINEM Since you still seem to not understand.. An ad hominem fallacy is committed when an individual employs an irrelevant personal attack against an opponent instead of addressing that opponent’s argument. Many discussions of such fallacies discuss judgments of relevance about such personal attacks, and consider how we might distinguish those that are relevant from those that are not. This paper will argue that the literature on bias and testimony can helpfully contribute to that analysis. This will highlight ways in which biases, particularly unconscious biases, can make ad hominem fallacies seem effective, even when the irrelevance is recognized. Yap, A. (2012). Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony. Argumentation, 27(2), 97-109. doi:10.1007/s10503-011-9260-5

it's easier than going to my peer reviewed journals, but since you seem to think google is innacurate ill brb.

An "argument ad hominem" (or "argumentum adhominem," to use the full New Latin phrase) was a valid method of persuasion by which a person took advantage of his or her opponent's interests or feelings in a debate, instead of just sticking to general principles. not a counter argument it's a comment on the quality of the argument.

Came back to see we are devolving into argumentum ad hominem. in order to claim that you are of higher intellectual stock you should probably not use logical fallacies. I could make fun of your eyebrows all day, but it doesnt really add anything to the conversation.

No you're cherry picking the argument. I believe that we admitted that a small minority earned what they got. brb in a few hours.

I can message you personally if you really like, but it's easier to just ask you a simple question. Is there any favoritism on the server?

This has happen a little less than a week ago trijim.

We know Dill's a meme. Everyone does. My point isn't specific, but one example would be a few old high level staff members are shooting up their bunks, rdming, etc (aka having a bit of fun). Having CG respond to only be told to fuck off by other current staff. That's just an example of something that happened recently. I'm not going to name names (cause i like most of them), but you'll just have to accept that I'm not lying.

If there is anything that i actually think needs to be fixed in servers in general it's the ease at which favoritism spreads, but again that boils down to objective morality that no one seems to understand anymore.

Stop Joah get out while you can! get out the last 10 you have are probably what are keeping you breathing. Run!

Please tell me more about my intentions.

Shut up dadd, I'm trying to keep them mad.